• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Now Belgium bans burqa in public places

.lava

Veteran Member
Obviously, in some societies it may pose a greater threat to women to rebel against it, for example in Afghanistan during the Taliban regime perhaps.
on the other hand, Europe is a liberal and secular place.

and i am trying to say that this is not about being European or secular or Muslim or non-Muslim or capitalist or Chinese or African....etc. yes, there are different cultures but we are all humans. you know, animals smell each other to know whom it is facing, humans need to see face to know the person they are communicating, meeting or seeing on the street. this is a basic human need in society. that's why i can't understand why such a human related subject is discussed as if it belongs to Europe or secular nations and their culture. Muslims are human too. when it comes to emotions and basic needs, there is no difference between.
if any time on Earth there was a society where women cover their faces, it only proves women were oppressed. it is normal to have radicals from any kind of angle and belief. matter of fact, lack of diversity in a society culd be consiered as a sign of oppression. btw Europe seem to headed that way. they can not handle idea of a woman with face cover. just like some nations could not handle a woman with mini skirts. IMO mind set and motivations of both are the same. they just happened to be opposite corners of the same room

.
 

beenie

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I haven't read through the hundreds of posts on this thread, but I'll put in my two cents' worth:

Banning the burqa is a futile, divisive, pathetic attempt at power-grabbing and grandstanding. It's counterproductive when it comes to dealing with Europe's very REAL problems with radical Islamist sects and terrorism.

It's akin to banning ski masks because some bank robbers use them, or banning those sort of weird Pentecostal hair styles because some women who wear them are treated as second class citizens by their religious sects (or at least some people ASSUME that they are being mistreated).

This sort of ridiculous legislation adds more anger and fuel to the fire of Muslim extremists by validating their cries of "Persecution!" by the Western societies that they've migrated to (the same ones that they refuse to adapt to - instead insisting on the adaptation of their values by their adopted countries - but that's another story).

That being said, there are definitely scenarios in which a burqa should be outlawed, or where a burqa should be required to be removed for identification or security purposes. Banks, airports, drivers license photos - any situation where ID must be verified.

Wow, this seems to be such common sense. Europe never ceases to amaze me when it comes to their approach to radical Islamist "issues."

COMPLETELY agree. how is banning the burqa ANY LESS OPPRESSIVE of women's rights?

They can do pretty much anything they want to do. You have to understand the mentality of them, to see it the way they do. I know many women who wear niqab (everything except the eyes), and they do whatever they want.

However, there are limitations, but not like going to the doctor and stuff like that. But yes, no women wearing this would actually want to be an actor, or a dancer. However, the other stuff you think propose problems, in reality it doesn't. Because there are females who occupy these jobs. As in a female dentist, a female hair stylist...

When a woman wears this, willingly, she's going an extra step and making things harder for herself, because she believes this makes her closer to god. So, the limitations that comes with that are accepted, but these limitations are not quite as you make them sound.

yes, i agree with all of this too. women who CHOOSE to wear the burqa are only making THEIR OWN lives more difficult. who are we to tell them to do otherwise? as long as no one makes ME wear it, who cares?

whatever.

I'm glad there are competent lifeguards out there for my kids.

i fail to see what this has to do with...anything. :shrug:

When yours is drowning,
don't complain when a woman in swimgear saves his life.

ok, i won't complain. ;) again, this has what to do with the burqa? i know a lot of people who can't swim. what's your point? :confused:

Lava,

I am simply describing what I see.
period.

Sorry if my perception of "bag" offends you.
(if I had intended to offend,
I could have done much better than "bag")

To live in a western society,
you'll have to be less sensitive to the perceptions of westerners.

For me... words/labels/names of things hold no specific sacred value.

I call it like I see it.

That's another thing about our culture.
We generally do not hold things sacred.
Do not expect to be treated "special"
or as some "exception"
in this regard.

:p i had to lol a bit at "bag" myself.

i agree; women who choose to wear a burqa should not require or request special treatment.

Now you're just trying to make up excuses that supposedly would "limit" them, she can find a straight female dentist. There is plenty of those.

Let me make something clear, any woman should be allowed to wear anything she wants, Is that clear? Wether niqab or a bikini. Any kind of law that limits them in this aspect, is disgusting. I hope this clears any misconceptions.

Also, its worth mentioning that i actually find niqab and burqa to be unnecessary, and i don't think women should wear them. However, that doesn't mean we should force anything on anyone.

100% agree. oppression is oppression. why does every friggin society feel the need to dictate what women should and shouldn't wear? :facepalm: why can't we trust women't ability to decide for themselves what to wear? if i don't like an outfit, i don't have to wear it. it's really quite simple.

doppelgänger;2111710 said:
Most modern westerners are conditioned to find abuse or oppressive treatment of women as disgusting. The women themselves will, of course, within the cultural context in which they are being abused, generally have no problem with it - largely because it's all they know and they have been conditioned with heavy feelings of guilt and shame as well as threat of physical violence and even death to submit to it.

One can have a "live and let live" attitude and not seek to force people to change their beliefs or practices, yet still express disgust at the idea of men being so afraid of their own sexuality that they need to put women in bags, or clip off parts of a woman's genitals.

And yes, it's their prerogative and it makes sense within the psychologically fractured world in which they operate. But I would be lying if I didn't say I find it all revolting and vile.

female circumcision IS NOT an Islamic practice. few Muslims DO it, but it's a cultural phenomenon that should be eradicated...but it's not Islamic. i do agree that there is a group of Muslims that are obsessed with sexual matters. those are the ones that try and force the burqa, tell women not to wear heels, make-up, cologne, and basically become invisible. i too find them revolting and vile.

[/FONT]

solve the puzzle then. i am a Muslim and i think face cover in a society is irritating, unacceptable and inhumane. what am i? a European?

if today women are wearing face cover in public, that's because they fear not to. in a soceity where women were oppressed and scared by men, i would probably wear whatever they wear to protect myself from being raped or physically attacked considering not covering your face would be taken by some men as an invitation. that's how i see why almost every women wear it in certain societies. though there are women who chose to wear it. i only saw one woman in my whole life. but that's not the issue if we're talking about societies where every women wear it. when something is done out of fear, we can't say it is acceptable, can we? IMO it is not even a norm

.

again, well stated and i agree. i will never understand why anyone should be forced to wear...or to remove...anything provided it doesn't endanger anyone. and i do feel there are times where a person NEEDS to be identified and those women who wear the burqa should be willing to remove the face portion to be identified. period.

my position is like Badran; i find it unnecessary and burdensome. but i'll be damned if i feel the need to forbid a woman who chooses to wear it to do so.
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
and i am trying to say that this is not about being European or secular or Muslim or non-Muslim or capitalist or Chinese or African....etc. yes, there are different cultures but we are all humans. you know, animals smell each other to know whom it is facing, humans need to see face to know the person they are communicating, meeting or seeing on the street. this is a basic human need in society. that's why i can't understand why such a human related subject is discussed as if it belongs to Europe or secular nations and their culture. Muslims are human too. when it comes to emotions and basic needs, there is no difference between.
if any time on Earth there was a society where women cover their faces, it only proves women were oppressed. it is normal to have radicals from any kind of angle and belief. matter of fact, lack of diversity in a society culd be consiered as a sign of oppression. btw Europe seem to headed that way. they can not handle idea of a woman with face cover. just like some nations could not handle a woman with mini skirts. IMO mind set and motivations of both are the same. they just happened to be opposite corners of the same room

.
I disagree on the last part of your post. while its obvious one doesn't need to be European to be shaken by the concept of women covering themselves from head to toe, European society is dramtically different than Turkish one or other Islamic societies when it comes to reaction to such phenomena, whether if by how alien it is to European societies, or by the secular and liberal atmosphere of nations in various parts of Europe.
 

.lava

Veteran Member
I disagree on the last part of your post. while its obvious one doesn't need to be European to be shaken by the concept of women covering themselves from head to toe, European society is dramtically different than Turkish one or other Islamic societies when it comes to reaction to such phenomena, whether if by how alien it is to European societies, or by the secular and liberal atmosphere of nations in various parts of Europe.

European has to realize, diversity is not about turning people into what you expect and want them to be. it is not even democracy. mean while they say dozens of things about human rights, they oppress people to be like them. that's a contradiction if you ask me. assimilating people has nothing to do with freedom and democracy. if their democracy, human rights and freedom were desinged only for a certain type of person and for a certain way of life, then maybe they should make up new titles or change the definition of each concept openly and clearly so that Muslims would know better where they are going into; a free society or a dictatorship ..

.
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
European has to realize, diversity is not about turning people into what you expect and want them to be. it is not even democracy. mean while they say dozens of things about human rights, they oppress people to be like them. that's a contradiction if you ask me. assimilating people has nothing to do with freedom and democracy. if their democracy, human rights and freedom were desinged only for a certain type of person and for a certain way of life, then maybe they should make up new titles or change the definition of each concept openly and clearly so that Muslims would know better where they are going into; a free society or a dictatorship ..

.
This is your side of the debate and one side of the coin, the other side of the coin is that Europeans view the Burqa as antagonizing to women and their dignity and as such as a practice which should not be practiced in their nations and societies. as for Muslims arriving to Europe, I think the healthy approach for immigrants is to embrace the social norms of the land you chose to immigrate to.
 

.lava

Veteran Member
This is your side of the debate and one side of the coin, the other side of the coin is that Europeans view the Burqa as antagonizing to women and their dignity and as such as a practice which should not be practiced in their nations and societies. as for Muslims arriving to Europe, I think the healthy approach for immigrants is to embrace the social norms of the land you chose to immigrate to.

so Saudi Arabia is doing right by forcing Christians wear like Muslims and banning wearing crosses?

.
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
so Saudi Arabia is doing right by forcing Christians wear like Muslims and banning wearing crosses?

.
Europeans are not banning Burqas because of religion, one of the reasons we hear from European leaders and organizations is the dignity of women, certainly nothing to do with banning Islam.
now if you would like to talk about the minaret ban in Switzerland, that could have been more relevant.
 

beenie

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
This is your side of the debate and one side of the coin, the other side of the coin is that Europeans view the Burqa as antagonizing to women and their dignity and as such as a practice which should not be practiced in their nations and societies. as for Muslims arriving to Europe, I think the healthy approach for immigrants is to embrace the social norms of the land you chose to immigrate to.

...and on the other side of the coin, some Muslims see women in bikinis as antagonizing to women and their dignity and as such a practice which should not be practiced in their nations and societies.

i don't support burqa-wearing, especially forcefully, but i'm making the point that it's all about perspective. women who choose to wear the burqa don't want nor need the liberation of the Europeans to make them feel whole.

again, if they ban it because of safety, that's another story. banning to liberate and assimilate? no thanks, they'll pass on that type of oppression.
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
...and on the other side of the coin, some Muslims see women in bikinis as antagonizing to women and their dignity and as such a practice which should not be practiced in their nations and societies.
Yes, end?
i don't support burqa-wearing, especially forcefully, but i'm making the point that it's all about perspective. women who choose to wear the burqa don't want nor need the liberation of the Europeans to make them feel whole.
This isnt the case with all women, some perhaps are wearing the Burqa from what I would view as a misguided form of religious experience, while others may view it as piety, but the fact remains, that there will always be women who have been indoctrinated or pressured into it. and perhaps those who do choose to wear it out of piety, need to take a moment to think how anachronistic it can be.

again, if they ban it because of safety, that's another story. banning to liberate and assimilate? no thanks, they'll pass on that type of oppression.
Perhaps, but aren't you speaking for other women? I'm sure many women who wear the burqa fantisize about the day that they can show their faces, have other people look at them, communicate with others from a normal place and without misconceptions, when they do not need to face the entire scope of inconveniences that are attached to the full veil.
 

beenie

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
i think you may have missed my point.

i'm sure there are women who feel obligated to wear it, and i agree that they may be misguided. those are not the women i'm referring to or speaking for. i'm speaking for the women who choose, on their own accord, to wear the burqa.

i've spoken to women who feel obligated to wear skimpy clothes to attract men as well. other women wear skimpy clothing because they want to. who should we control next?
 

zenzero

Its only a Label

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
In Europe society has always proscribed what people can or can not wear in public.
In Victorian and earlier times a knee length skirt would have been a public scandal and the person arrested.

At the same time people bathed in the nude in the sea, only a short time later Bathing machines were invented to allow people to enter the sea unseen. as the fashion developed ,people took to wearing elaborate bathing dresses including stockings corsets and hats.

In the 50's a girl could be arrested for wearing a sleeveless dress in Spain. At a Madrid bathing pool, I was very nearly arrested for not wrapping a towel around my waist when I came out of the pool. Some Americans who objected were arrested. decency laws were enforced by the police on behalf of the Roman Catholic Church, as agreed with Franco.

During the influx of Moslem's from Mainly Pakistan during the late 50's and 70's Moslem's did not wear their Asian dress but almost with out exception wore European clothes. This was entirely of their own choice. It was not till the late 90's that Asian men started to wear Muslim dress and not till the 2000's that women started to wear face veils.

The families of those 50's incomers which had integrated so well, started to form their own communities and take on Pakistani identity.

They now complain that they are singled out.

A medical practise manager I know, will not allow his wife to learn English nor go out on her own.
 

Tiapan

Grumpy Old Man
To the west there are many good Germans, but the ones who wear a swastika are making a statement about their beliefs. A belief that is despised by all good citizens everywhere.
Likewise the birqua is not viewed as a clothing of choice, but a symbol of the worst kind of fanatasism since nazism. The west is fully justified in its affront and rejection of this "symbol of Faith".

Cheers
 

Caladan

Agnostic Pantheist
i think you may have missed my point.

i'm sure there are women who feel obligated to wear it, and i agree that they may be misguided. those are not the women i'm referring to or speaking for. i'm speaking for the women who choose, on their own accord, to wear the burqa.

i've spoken to women who feel obligated to wear skimpy clothes to attract men as well. other women wear skimpy clothing because they want to. who should we control next?
And here is a distinction, in European society it can be a social standard to dress in an attractive way, however the full veil is seen by most Europeans as a sign of misogyny, and I can certainly see where the debate is coming from.
 

Badran

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Friends,

We have been discussing the topic for so long; just would like everyone to know the origin of the *burqa* and its consequences in today's context.
Kindly read the ppt from link provided:
The_Canvas_Prison.pps
or
http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/17433431/126184732/name/The_Canvas_Prison.pps

then let us ask, do women of today require such attire, is it practically required?
Life is for living and living in harmony is what religion is all about.

Love & rgds

The problem once again with this slide show, is that its all about Afghanistan. The worst example there is. Yes, its a horrible place where unspeakable things happen, and that should be fought. Not women in other societies.
 

Badran

Veteran Member
Premium Member
To the west there are many good Germans, but the ones who wear a swastika are making a statement about their beliefs. A belief that is despised by all good citizens everywhere.
Likewise the birqua is not viewed as a clothing of choice, but a symbol of the worst kind of fanatasism since nazism. The west is fully justified in its affront and rejection of this "symbol of Faith".

Cheers

Those two examples have very little if anything in common at all. Women don't cover their faces to rub it in, or as a symbol. And if we assume so, the symbols resemble two completely different types of things.
 

beenie

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
And here is a distinction, in European society it can be a social standard to dress in an attractive way, however the full veil is seen by most Europeans as a sign of misogyny, and I can certainly see where the debate is coming from.

i can see it too, but my point is that it's also a sign of misogyny to force women who are WILLINGLY wearing it to remove it. just because the Europeans see it one way doesn't mean the rest of the world has to as well.

haven't women been donning the burqa for some time now? why is this suddenly an issue?
 

beenie

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
To the west there are many good Germans, but the ones who wear a swastika are making a statement about their beliefs. A belief that is despised by all good citizens everywhere.
Likewise the birqua is not viewed as a clothing of choice, but a symbol of the worst kind of fanatasism since nazism. The west is fully justified in its affront and rejection of this "symbol of Faith".

Cheers

are you seriously comparing the swastika to a burqa? the swastika represents hatred to an entire race of people; the burqa represents what? ultra-conservative Muslims. it doesn't represent hate. oppression is subjective, the swastika isn't.
 

Panda

42?
Premium Member
are you seriously comparing the swastika to a burqa? the swastika represents hatred to an entire race of people; the burqa represents what? ultra-conservative Muslims. it doesn't represent hate. oppression is subjective, the swastika isn't.


All symbols are subjective.
 
Top