• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Observers not allowed to monitor the vote count by the Democrats.

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
The issue of your absurd accusations is the Republican poll workers were not allowed in the polling places. All the polling places in the country had Republican and Democratic observers.
Then why is Trump stating otherwise?
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
You have failed to provide source that is relevant., because no source your testimony is unreliable.

The standard response when one doesn’t have a counter... “provide a source”. I live here and know what goes on in my state. Are you telling me I don’t? That’s some big hairy coconuts.

Here’s one, you want more? https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/19/nyregion/nj-election-mail-voting-fraud.html

O
h, and another list Voter Fraud Map: Election Fraud Database | The Heritage Foundation
 
Last edited:

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Its not my absurd claims. I'm just asking a question why Democrats are trying to keep people out.

They did not try to keep people out. They did not allow a rowdy crowd, but did allow individuals to observe if they complied with the rules. All polling places in the country have Republican and Democrat poll workers and observers. As far as observers go you simply have to apply and follow the rules,
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The standard response when one doesn’t have a counter... “provide a source”. I live here and know what goes on in my state. Are you telling me I don’t? That’s some big hairy coconuts.

If you cannot find a source then you probably do not know. What do you base this supposed knowledge on? If you base it on the wild rambling claims of the President then you have nothing. Citation needed is a challenge that needs to be met with reliable sources. "Feelings" don't count.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
The standard response when one doesn’t have a counter... “provide a source”. I live here and know what goes on in my state. Are you telling me I don’t? That’s some big hairy coconuts.

Still not a reliable independent source for your accusations.

Still waiting . . .
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Thats what gives Trump credibility in calling it out. From what I understand, he had to get a Judges ruling to ensure people were allowed inside to monitor the process. Prior to that it seems Democrats didn't want to be watched or monitored while counting votes.
Read the link. People were already allowed in.
 

AgnosticGuy

Open-minded skeptic
No. Just stating that Democrats might be up to something like usual.
Unlike many, I'm open to the idea that the Democrats (and anyone else for that matter) are willing to cheat to stay in power or to help their favorite candidate. To think that is impossible is just being dismissive, and I assume many Dems. dismiss it because their candidate is up in the polls. But what's most important here is the proof. Trump needs to focus more on building a case, if any, before just throwing out accusations.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
The standard response when one doesn’t have a counter... “provide a source”. I live here and know what goes on in my state. Are you telling me I don’t? That’s some big hairy coconuts.
When you make a claim it is on you to furnish the evidence.
Provide a source is a perfectly valid request.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Christ alive. This election is more dramatic than a soap opera

upload_2020-11-6_12-3-30.gif
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
If you cannot find a source then you probably do not know. What do you base this supposed knowledge on? If you base it on the wild rambling claims of the President then you have nothing. Citation needed is a challenge that needs to be met with reliable sources. "Feelings" don't count.

Because I ****ing live in NJ.
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
When you make a claim it is on you to furnish the evidence.
Provide a source is a perfectly valid request.

I live in NJ and know our politics. Now, you prove me wrong and back up your challenge. Can you do that for me? Yeah no, I didn’t think so.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
The idea is there but the language is incorrect. They can be as close as 6 feet. "Within 6 feet" implies that they cannot be more than six feet away but can come closer.

When a target is 'within range' for example that means that it is closer than the furthest that a gun can shoot accurately.
No, it means they can get up to six feet close. Rather than the 20 it was before.
But, don't forget the Trumpeters have largely neglected any concern for covid for themselves or others. I doubt they'll be satisfied unless they can be right next to the count.
 

Jainarayan

ॐ नमो भगवते वासुदेवाय
Staff member
Premium Member
But, don't forget the Trumpeters have largely neglected any concern for covid for themselves or others. I doubt they'll be satisfied unless they can be right next to the count.

What do you base that on? Are there statistics, trends, patterns, quotations? Why do you doubt, is there hard evidence?
 
Top