I did. Or are you also calling me a liar that I made up things going on in my own state? What would you know about it anyway? How would you know what is a valid and reliable source anyway? I mean since you don’t live here or know anything about us.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Observers not allowed to monitor the vote count by the Democrats.
- Thread starter Twilight Hue
- Start date
I did. Or are you also calling me a liar that I made up things going on in my own state? What would you know about it anyway? How would you know what is a valid and reliable source anyway? I mean since you don’t live here or know anything about us.
Thanks, that’s what I wanted to hear.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Even if that were true, rules didn't matter to you over the last four years, so why all of the sudden do they now? After throwing your moral compass away, you don't get to dig it back out of the trash when it's convenient.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Local newspapers are usually pretty good. I furnished those whenever I made claims about some of the outlandish behaviors in Indiana. Like bad police behaviors, I linked to a cop who threatened to shoot a mayor, a cop who tased an elderly man with Alzheimer's, and the Indianapolis police trying to cover up for a cop who was driving drunk while on duty and he killed another motorist. So when I complained about local police behavior I could support my claims, because I could have just been running my mouth and making things up.
That's why evidence is so important.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
They already had observers. They didn't need an unruly mob of buffoons with an agenda barging in and crowding the place. Useless dopes wouldn't even know or understand what they were looking at anyway.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic | Nature Human Behaviour
Political partisanship influences behavioral responses to governors’ recommendations for COVID-19 prevention in the United States
Politics is wrecking America’s pandemic response
Partisan Differences Over the Pandemic Response Are Growing
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I wouldn't be surprised if they are trying to do another Brooks Brothers Riot type of thing.
Brooks Brothers riot - Wikipedia
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Because he's Trump, and constantly making **** up is what he's known for? Hello? Where the hell have you been?
AgnosticGuy
Open-minded skeptic
I don't have any evidence of fraud in regards to mail-in ballots, but again, the fact that it hasn't happened in the past does not mean that it can't happen at all. Look, here's the strongest case that I've been able to find that for potential fraud in the 2020 presidential election:
Here's another factor to consider. One thing I will be looking for is the rejection rate of mail-in ballots because there are reports that hundreds of thousands of these types of ballots usually get rejected because of errors. If the rate of rejection for the 2020 election for a particular state is less than that of previous elections involving mail in ballots, then that alone would be questionable.
"In the 2018 General Election, the number of mail-in ballots topped 42 million, with about 30 million returned. But rejection rates also increased dramatically as election officials tossed out more than 425,000 mail-in ballots -- about one in every seven ballots returned. Again, signature issues were cited for the largest portion of rejections."
750,000 mail-in ballots were rejected in 2016 and 2018. Here's why that matters.
For instance, if any of the highly contested states, like Pennsylvania, had little to no rejected mail-in ballots (esp. if it was for a particular candidate), wouldn't that be suspicious?
*Also, please keep in mind that I'm an Independent. I don't "support" either of your parties, but rather I support certain policies. I vote for whoever has the most policy I can agree with irrespective of their party.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Trump goes off no doubt, but one thing I noticed that there is some truth associated with things he's says to a greater extent. As the left likes to say, "If there is nothing to hide, then there is nothing to worry about".
Ratt Blastard
Member
Quit listening to Q-anon.
Do you really get all of your news from a single, biased side? It ain't like that at all, as anybody who cares to check out the facts could learn. I assume the facts are not of interest to you, only the basic conspiracy theory.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
So no evidence at all. Rejection of a ballot is not evidence of fraud.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
So you have nothing. Thanks for sharing.
Tambourine
Well-Known Member
So have you already armed yourself for the inevitable Marxist coup?
Be vigilant, Freedom Fighters! The Reds are Coming!
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Probably. Only one way to find out.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I read a blog post that was provided here, it was how this author, who lives in rural Indiana, feels the state has changed slowly over the years. He lives there.
But I was able to provide evidence it's not changing but really is just the same crappy, high-prejudiced state it has always been. Because what I know of the state said otherwise.
This is why we need evidence.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I had to watch Trump's speech today, because I knew nothing else like that would ever happen again.
It affirmed why I don't watch that many TV shows or movies. But it was made worse because Trump sounded like a child who just gained competence in reading out loud.
