Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I dunno. It would require a comparison of how childern were in the past vs childern today.Is there empirical evidence that hitting
children is better than alternatives?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I dunno. It would require a comparison of how childern were in the past vs childern today.Is there empirical evidence that hitting
children is better than alternatives?
What scripture do you have to support this warped thinking?I wonder when the faithful arrive at the Pearly Gates,
which faction will gain admittance, & which will escalate
down to the Lake of Fire.....the beaters or the rod sparers?
Only then will they know who "correctly" interpreted the Bible.
(IMO)
And, thus, you have today’s youth’s problems and tomorrow rulers and your judges… God help us.As I mentioned previously, pull that stunt in the UK in public, and you'd get "corrected."
No. It's actually way worse for kids with such things.but it can also be useful to children with compulsive and attention deficit disorders. This can be much healthier and safer than drugs.
What problems? People in the UK tend to be better off than us.And, thus, you have today’s youth’s problems and tomorrow rulers and your judges… God help us.
Keep your god over there thanks. It's 2024 over here and adults striking children is not viewed kindly.And, thus, you have today’s youth’s problems and tomorrow rulers and your judges… God help us.
Another Trump-derangement syndrome. Common, tell us how your really feel.Keep your god over there thanks. It's 2024 over here and adults striking children is not viewed kindly.
And rulers? That's laughable coming from the country that produced Trump; is he a product of your religious "corrections" ?
I work with children, sorry, little monsters, who have ADD and ADHD. Thankfully somebody with your level of ignorance wouldn't be allowed within a mile of the school.Spanking is not always a form of child abuse. That claim comes from a one size fits all mentality. Spanking can be taken too far, but it can also be useful to children with compulsive and attention deficit disorders. This can be much healthier and safer than drugs.
A quick open hand slap to the leg, can occur as fast the brief attention span of the most deficit children. They can process this, since it is within their attention range. It does not have to break bones, but just enough pain to change the focus, at the violation. Cause, effect, cause.
A long winded time out; 1 hour, for a child that can only focus for 2 seconds, will never work. This is how you train little monsters. Their mind will wonder after a minute, and then forget the original crime. They may learn to accept the time out, as justification to be mean in the future. To much time to reverse engineer. A controlled spanking would make the original violation; cause and effect, conscious. Then it is done. They can go back to play, learning to censor this exact behavior, with possible future quick lessons; pending.
The problem is many parents have monster kids they cannot control. Maybe the parents need to be spanked for their child's bad behavior. I do not mean in an abusive way. But this way we can avoid all concerns of child abuse and still get the job done. This is a liberal problem now covered up with drugs. Out of sight out of mind. Spanking parents would make it come back to mind for real change.
What gave spanking a bad name, was caused by adults taking out their adult frustrations on children. The spanking became more of an adult release of pressure and stress, and less about constructive attention and impulse control and direction for children. A teacher with a class full of monsters could get angry on some days, and over spank; enough for all, targeted at one. This is where the teacher would be better off going to the parents house and see if they can benefit by a spanking; spank the monster creator. Then it is not child abuse.
LOL…keep dreaming my friend… keep dreaming.This sounds like a claim that beating children
isn't yielding the results you want.
You're the one crowing about the joys of spanking and indicating that it produces good leaders. You've got bible-derangement syndrome.Another Trump-derangement syndrome. Common, tell us how your really feel.
I grew up in a small town in Oklahoma and went to a school where paddling kids was like some kind of weird perverted religious sacrament. When I had kids of my own I sent them to a school that didn't use physical violence as a means of discipline. Both my kids grew up to be well adjusted and productive individuals.
I'm amazed. I didn't associate it with Christianity, just some ignorant attitude seemingly from a Charles Dickens novel.we faced backlash from other Christian parents we knew and some we didn't know for not spanking our children
This sounds more like Trump derangement syndrome.
LOL… only in your imagination. I guess atheists do it just because you want to?
Another Trump-derangement syndrome. Common, tell us how your really feel.
LOL…keep dreaming my friend… keep dreaming.
I'm amazed. I didn't associate it with Christianity, just some ignorant attitude seemingly from a Charles Dickens novel.
My wife & I only used the latter.Outright physical abuse or a simple swat on the fanny?
You're the one crowing about the joys of spanking and indicating that it produces good leaders.
Yes, but if I push him too hard, he might teach me good behaviour by hitting me.I'm sure you noticed that the person you quoted resorted to rude accusations instead of addressing Christians supporting an immoral leader like Trump.
It's a Revelation to me.This episode give a whole new meaning to the phrase 'Bible. Belt.'