Pogo
Well-Known Member
I doubt I am much younger than you, it is not about age, but inclusive religious history is not what you appear to think it is.It's in the younger generation's hands, for better or worse. I may ignore the entire case and keep my mouth shut. We truly don't need the dialogue anyway. We don't require negotiations. It's your country, too. Your decisions and if you don't want inclusive religious history as part of our education as a free nation, it's not my future to concern myself with. Truth be told, I have no right to step in and screw up the antireligious movement taking place in the nation, anyway.
Yes, that is rather the point of the first amendment, governmental influence on faith oriented institutions is frowned upon, do you have a reason to disagree with this long standing attitude?Most everyone I've spoken to disapproves of religion and faith-oriented institutions with governmental influence. I don't understand much about the modern world. It's all LGBT, secular triumph, and if you're a man sit your butt down, unless you're not a straight male, then you can have a voice again.
As an aside as a straight male I am more than happy to recognize that many of my coworkers were not, but as a difference from where I grew up in a good midwestern town, they are not shunned and contribute every much as I and others do.
I doubt it, but we do recognize you as the anachronism that you are.cib, I'm having a seat with the rest of the underground. We'll come out of the woodwork one day ourselves, just like those who placed us here did. I'm grabbing my popcorn.
We will be more than happy to welcome you into the 21st century when you are ready, and that does not mean that you need to give up your belief in a god in any way.
Welcome
As I said, you are welcome to join 21st century humanity and the modern understandings of your Christ.It's your ball - your court ... my apologies.
I'll quit stepping on toes
Good luck