Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Many people who believe in God will go to doctors. Why do you think they do that?Creationists have weird expectations and standards.
The annual accretion of thickness added to earth by accretion is approximately 0.07 to 0.14 micrometers (0.07 to 0.14 x 10^-6 meters).
Minimum time: ( \frac{8,046.72 \text{ meters}}{0.14 \times 10^{-6} \text{ meters/year}} \approx. 57.48 \times 10^9 \text{ years} )
Maximum time: ( \frac{8,046.72 \text{ meters}}{0.07 \times 10^{-6} \text{ meters/year}} \approx. 114.95 \times 10^9 \text{ years} )
So, it would take approximately 57.48 to 114.95 billion years to add a thickness of 5 miles to the Earth’s surface through accretion at the current rate.
Taking the smaller number there would not be enough time in 4 times the amount of time to cover the oil 5 miles deep under the crust of the ocean floor.
Maybe they did not do the math.
Now maybe you can see why I question everything about our universe.
Enjoy,
To treat medical issues, I would assume.Many people who believe in God will go to doctors. Why do you think they do that?
I don't know what you mean by "creationist," I suppose you consider yourself to be an evolutionist? What are your personal expectations and standards?Creationists have weird expectations and standards.
Of course I am an evolutionist. There isn't really any dispute there for me to take sides about.I don't know what you mean by "creationist," I suppose you consider yourself to be an evolutionist? What are your personal expectations and standards?
And why is that -- do you think maybe they don't want to get sick or sicker? And...die? Humans will take their dogs to the vet. Dogs have not sent other dogs to veterinary schools.To treat medical issues, I would assume.
Ok I wasn't talking about your belief necessarily. Just the term evolutionist. Some object to the term. I believe that "in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Obviously not everyone believes in God the same way As we can see here.Of course I am an evolutionist. There isn't really any dispute there for me to take sides about.
I expect fact to be respected over fantasy.
I don't think the concept of creation is a fantasy. I believe much of what some (not all) scientists ponder over falls in the realm of fantastical beliefs.Of course I am an evolutionist. There isn't really any dispute there for me to take sides about.
I expect fact to be respected over fantasy.
Me too. But sometimes people ponder over what may be ..or might have been. Ok have a good night. Bye for now.Of course I am an evolutionist. There isn't really any dispute there for me to take sides about.
I expect fact to be respected over fantasy.
@LuisDantas Ok I change that to fantastical possibilities. Maybe not beliefs.I don't think the concept of creation is a fantasy. I believe much of what some (not all) scientists ponder over falls in the realm of fantastical beliefs.
No, that was the view of one particular group in one particular region roughly 2,500 years ago. They were followers of a god who first appears in history around 1500 BCE.Life was formed from the dust of the ground.
Enjoy,
And why is that -- do you think maybe they don't want to get sick or sicker? And...die? Humans will take their dogs to the vet. Dogs have not sent other dogs to veterinary schools.
Ok I wasn't talking about your belief necessarily. Just the term evolutionist. Some object to the term. I believe that "in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Obviously not everyone believes in God the same way As we can see here.
I don't think the concept of creation is a fantasy. I believe much of what some (not all) scientists ponder over falls in the realm of fantastical beliefs.
Me too. But sometimes people ponder over what may be ..or might have been. Ok have a good night. Bye for now.
@LuisDantas Ok I change that to fantastical possibilities. Maybe not beliefs.
Sorry, I was trying to bring out that I believe in creation by God and I also believe that there are mechanisms like DNA and RNA that He set in place.And that connects to this thread because...?
And that is relevant because...?
I don't know of objection to the term. Why would that happen?
Then you have an urgent need to learn better.
This pointless statement is a waste of our time.
I thought we were to talk about evolution and Creationism?
Seriously, what is your point?
P.S. not all those who believe in creation by a Higher Power believe the same things. For instance, some believe that the soul leaves the body and goes into another body when the person dies perhaps so it can become a bit complicated to talk about. They may also say they believe in evolution. It's probably best to discuss these things on an individual basis.And that connects to this thread because...?
And that is relevant because...?
I don't know of objection to the term. Why would that happen?
Then you have an urgent need to learn better.
This pointless statement is a waste of our time.
I thought we were to talk about evolution and Creationism?
Seriously, what is your point?
How would you test them?
No, please try to be serious.That is just as much to go on as you have.
Is it a false claim, to question what existed at one billionth of a second after nothing existed.
Remember nothing exists outside of the universe as it is self-contained, or do you disagree that it is self-contained?
On billionth of a second for something to begin to exist and start expanding into the universe just seems impossible to me. But that's just me and my little pea sized brain.
Is asking the question, where the universe come from a false claim?
Is asking where life came from a false claim?
Is questioning experiments a false?
You do not know that. Or you just admitted that you cannot be honest. If you can be honest I can show you how we know that evolution is a fact.No, you can show me how you think, not know that we are the product of evolution.
Is questioning science period a false claim?
Enjoy,
What? Your post makes no sense at all.. What are you trying to argue here?The annual accretion of thickness added to earth by accretion is approximately 0.07 to 0.14 micrometers (0.07 to 0.14 x 10^-6 meters).
Minimum time: ( \frac{8,046.72 \text{ meters}}{0.14 \times 10^{-6} \text{ meters/year}} \approx. 57.48 \times 10^9 \text{ years} )
Maximum time: ( \frac{8,046.72 \text{ meters}}{0.07 \times 10^{-6} \text{ meters/year}} \approx. 114.95 \times 10^9 \text{ years} )
So, it would take approximately 57.48 to 114.95 billion years to add a thickness of 5 miles to the Earth’s surface through accretion at the current rate.
Taking the smaller number there would not be enough time in 4 times the amount of time to cover the oil 5 miles deep under the crust of the ocean floor.
Maybe they did not do the math.
Now maybe you can see why I question everything about our universe.
Enjoy,
That is only because you refuse to learn the basics of science. You have never been able to support your anti science claims. You don't even try.I don't think the concept of creation is a fantasy. I believe much of what some (not all) scientists ponder over falls in the realm of fantastical beliefs.
Not true, and it is sad that I am now going to put YOU on ignore. Bye again.That is only because you refuse to learn the basics of science. You have never been able to support your anti science claims. You don't even try.
So you are a theistic evolutionist?Sorry, I was trying to bring out that I believe in creation by God and I also believe that there are mechanisms like DNA and RNA that He set in place.