CynthiaCypher
Well-Known Member
Just not on their historical lands.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Palestinians under attack
- Thread starter Matemkar
- Start date
Just not on their historical lands.
xkatz
Well-Known Member
I believe that it should roughly be the 1967 borders with land swaps (eg Israel get's Modi'in Illit, Palestine gets Nazareth).
What exactly do you mean?
American media has been feeding its country lies. America is a well known allies with Israel and has been for years. It is also no secret that they provide Israel with a huge portion of the very weapons and military funding they are using to attack Palestine. America has been anti Muslim since 2001, and it is easy for people to sympathize with Jews because we all still regret the Holocaust. For America to reject its Jewish allies and become pro Muslim would be absurd. It would also mean sacrificing American military bases in Israel.
Sure Hamas has done some horrible things but not all Muslims are Sunni and not all Sunnis are extremists. The individuals are paying for the acts of groups and governments in both Israel AND Palestine but the media is slanted. Its hate mongering misinformation used to justify Obama bombing children.
Sure Hamas has done some horrible things but not all Muslims are Sunni and not all Sunnis are extremists. The individuals are paying for the acts of groups and governments in both Israel AND Palestine but the media is slanted. Its hate mongering misinformation used to justify Obama bombing children.
Palestine would get Nazareth? I could be very wrong but isnt that kind of Holy land?
xkatz
Well-Known Member
It's part of Israel and Eretz Yisroel technically, but it's predominately Arab Muslim and has no Jewish presence or holy sites. I would want to swap it for one of the large settler cities/blocs (eg Gush Etzion) in the West Bank.
Last edited:
CMike
Well-Known Member
And where are their historical lands?
There never was an independent muslim palestinian state.
There have have been two previous Israeli states in that area.
CMike
Well-Known Member
Yup, and their state is in jordan.
Matemkar
Active Member
Last edited:
xkatz
Well-Known Member
Why do you keep changing your link?
Did you realize that this- A Six-Step Program to Prosecute the Zionists Who Support Genocide and Political Corruption | Veterans Today
is meaningless conspiracy drivel that has little tidbits like this:
Last edited:
Matemkar
Active Member
Nope, I read it all, saw it all and I did not agree on all but I wanted to share it. Yet, it took a long time for me and I thought none may be that patient/persistent, so I just shared one video in it. And in time I was going to share the rest, but since you did it, it won't be necessary any more. Thanks for re-sharing the first link of mine. As for the article, I could omit the parts that I don't agree with and present to you. And that part I wouldn't omit. Thanks.
Last edited:
xkatz
Well-Known Member
What parts of the article wouldn't you agree with? I'm curious.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
And in the Gospel of Luke it says that God sent Angel Gabriel to Nazareth, the homeland of virgin Mary and Nazareth consists of Arabs 70% Muslims and 30% Christians.
So you didn't hear about the Palestinian refugees.
Do you agree then that the Palestinians who were displaced have the right to return back to their own lands which were stolen by the new comers ?
xkatz
Well-Known Member
No I am aware of the problem. I believe that they should have the right to return to a Palestinian state (roughly 1967 borders), but not Israel. Israel should offer some form of compensation to those whose who can prove they had property which they owned taken in the '48 or '67 wars.
Last edited:
xkatz
Well-Known Member
I don't see how Nazareth currently being mainly Arab Muslim has to do with Jesus being Jewish or not...
Flankerl
Well-Known Member
Why not? Its a fun video.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
Jesus spoke Aramaic and not Hebrew.
Jesus spoke Aramaic
John 7:1
After this, Jesus went around in Galilee. He did not want to go about in Judea because the Jewish leaders there were looking for a way to kill him.
xkatz
Well-Known Member
The ancient dialect of Aramaic spoken in the region is nearly identical to Hebrew. Most Jews spoke Aramaic and not Hebrew at that time period and there are even some Jewish prayers said in Aramaic.
Jewish Aramaic - My Jewish Learning
How is that proof he wasn't Jewish?
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
That confirms that Palestine wasn't for the Jews since the official language wasn't Hebrew but Aramaic and in which the Jews were forced to learn it in order to communicate with the natives of the people of Palestine who spoke Aramaic and some Greek.
There were 3 languages spoken which were Hebrew ,Aramaic and Greek, but as you point out that Aramaic was used more than Hebrew and i think that tells it all.
How is that proof he wasn't Jewish?
Is it that hard to understand ?
Jesus didn't walk in their lands which means that the place which he lived in wasn't for the Jews otherwise his life will be in risk.
Matemkar
Active Member
Injured civilians at Gaza's al-Shifa Hospital:
[youtube]VVb0lC6FKRI[/youtube]
[Raw footage] Injured civilians at Gaza's al-Shifa Hospital - YouTube
[youtube]VVb0lC6FKRI[/youtube]
[Raw footage] Injured civilians at Gaza's al-Shifa Hospital - YouTube