YmirGF said:
Yes, The_Truth, please explain. Thanks for doing what Mehrosh could not.
You are most welcome.
About Mehrosh, it's not the case that he can't give you the direct answer but we muslims don't just talk from our mind about Islam but we must be sure of what we are saying. I believe, he is trying hardly to give you tons of proofs instead of giving the direct simple answer like what i did.
Most of historians whether they were muslims or not muslims believes that Mohammed "peace be upon him" was indeed, an illitrate.
How we gonna know about somthing happened before 1400 years a go?
If i showed you a verse which say that he was illitrate (the word of God), you will simply reject it because you want to make sure first whether he write himself or not, i guess.
Do we have some certificate at that time or somthing similar? Of course not.
So, what we gonna do then to deal with this issue?
OK, if you want to know this, you have to go back 1400 years ago to see what was the common art among arabs at that time. They had nothing excpt thier beautiful language, Arabic.
Most of the people at that time wrote/recited their poems "for instance" and even though they were normal people so the arabic historian didn't spare them and they gave us tons of books which talks about their art in language whether it was poems or other things. Do you think if prophet Mohammed had somthing like that no one will mention it? even his enemies?
Think about it a little bit.
How we gonna know for sure that he didn't write nor read in his entire life?
I'll ask you a question, if you told me that a guy before 1000 years a go for instance didn't ride a horse in his entire life how I would know if you were telling the truth?
I have to ask first whether people at that time saw him riding horses or not, right?
Because he must need a horse to travel or to move from a city to another.
Then, if i didn't find the information which i want so i should look for ANY evidance that prove the guy skills in riding horses, right?
What if i didn't find that evidence? will i believe what the history says or i'll go to you asking you to bring a proof for somthing NEVER HAPPENED, that someone before 1000 years a go didn't do it?
I should bring any evidenace that prove my argument or i just have to accept it because i have no evidance.
OK, another thing ...
If you were standing in front of the law in the court because they THOUGHT you stole somthing for instance, do you have to proof that you didn't steal anything (i didn't do it, i didn't do it bla bla" who would believe you"?) or they should bring any evidance that you did it?
They first have to bring any small evidence that you might do it or you have any bad record in your profile and they will try to find anything you left while you were stealing? is it? also, you have to proof where you were at that time.
If they have no evidance so they must apologize for you and send you home and you might ask them later on to give you some millions for the damage they cause for you
Now, if you have any evidance whether from what the historian says, any documents, any preproof or just anything that prove prophet Mohammed could write and read so bring your evidence or just accept it as the historians believed that he was indeed, an illitrate.
No body saw him reading and no body saw him writing.
A prophet who hold this message as one of the Jewish said to the uncle of prophet Mohammed is not allowed to read nor write and he must not meet his father because this is one of the prophecies of the last messenger of God, Mohammed "peace be upon him".
You would say why he didn't teach himself while he was encouraging others to do it.
The answer is that he is not allowed to do so because Allah knew that some people will claim that he wrote it by himself.
Also, his enemies at that time never claimed that he wrote it by himself nor he stole it from other sources because they knew, he can't read and he can't write. That's why they said, he is crazy, poet or magician (God forbid) because they couldn't explain from where did he brought these words.
Don't forget that he was just reciting it and this is excatly what Jesus "peace be upon him" told us:
"I have yet many things to say unto you, but you cannot bear them now. How be it when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth; for
he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak; and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me; for he shall recieve of mine and he shall shew it unto you" John 16:12-14
If you can tell me from where did he bring these words (Quran) so i'll listen to you ..
enlighten me ...
Peace ...