Nehustan
Well-Known Member
A Couple of things....
Firstly personally I have a problem with using the Bible to 'verify' the vailidity of Muhammad on a couple of points. I think the first one is that 'The Spirit' is of very great importance to the Christians, and the verse relating to the 'comforter' (Ahmed in Arabic) would need them to make a paradigm shift from their Christian perspective. Added to this is the fact that their own book warns them not to blaspheme/deny the spirit. So you can see the problem. Using this verse to verify the coming of Muhammad (although it may well be true!!!!) will push certain Christians away from Islam, rather than bringing them closer. Secondly as the Quran states it is a completion, with previous revelations as steps toward an end. I think when I consider 'faults' in the Bible (i'm not sure there are that many the more I learn of Islam) I bring to mind the ayat of the Quran where Muhammad is told to respond to those who ask 'Why wasn't the Quran revealed complete?' He is instructed to reply 'It is revealed in stages, so as to strengthen you'. If this was then true for Muhammad's revelation, then would it not be true of all revelation. So if the previous books were true for previous people, as with say the teaching of a High School child different from Post Graduate Doctorates, so its not that the Bible is wrong, rather knowledge is (in fact always) revealed in stages. Thus I think that the proof of Muhammad should solely be The Quran and Hadith, and we should only look at complimentary knowledge from the previous revelations, rather than choosing parts over which there could be conflict. My opinion, and as they say opinions are like....
A secondary point...we came back to evolution. Mehrosh asked how did the Universe evolve, well its true that to my mind the Universe began with a event, a singularity, what would commonly be called 'The Big Bang', but our stellar system evolved after that event. Our planets are far younger than the universe proper and underwent an evolution of their own. Life on the planet, well I would remind my Muslim brothers here....that we are not bound by the Genesis story....that is really for the Jews and Christians to try and understand, the Muslims have been freed from any duty to understand such things, and if they are wise they would stick to the Quran and Hadith. In Islam we are told that Allah uses means for all that occurs within the creation. We are also told that when Allah says 'Be' that it is. We are also told that Allah 'molded' Adam, then (presumambly when the 'clay' was perfected) he breathed Ruh (Spirit) into him. There is nothing in these teaching that contradicts what we are told by modern science. It may be that people think that when God says be in his realm that what he has commanded immediately occurs within our time frame, but this would almost be a subtle form of shirk, in that you attempt to attribute our perception of time to Allah. When God said be in his realm it could have manifest within linear time WITHIN the creation as 10 MIllion years.
I believe that Allah is the Infinite and Absolute that sustains and encompasses the creation, both the First heaven within the Kursi, and the creation hidden from our eyes up to the Arsh, up to Firdaus. Although I cannot prove this through scientific method I believe he was the cause of the fluctuation in the singularity that preceeded the big bang as the Quran states 'Once the heavens and the earth were joined together...then they were split apart' (paraphrased).
Firstly personally I have a problem with using the Bible to 'verify' the vailidity of Muhammad on a couple of points. I think the first one is that 'The Spirit' is of very great importance to the Christians, and the verse relating to the 'comforter' (Ahmed in Arabic) would need them to make a paradigm shift from their Christian perspective. Added to this is the fact that their own book warns them not to blaspheme/deny the spirit. So you can see the problem. Using this verse to verify the coming of Muhammad (although it may well be true!!!!) will push certain Christians away from Islam, rather than bringing them closer. Secondly as the Quran states it is a completion, with previous revelations as steps toward an end. I think when I consider 'faults' in the Bible (i'm not sure there are that many the more I learn of Islam) I bring to mind the ayat of the Quran where Muhammad is told to respond to those who ask 'Why wasn't the Quran revealed complete?' He is instructed to reply 'It is revealed in stages, so as to strengthen you'. If this was then true for Muhammad's revelation, then would it not be true of all revelation. So if the previous books were true for previous people, as with say the teaching of a High School child different from Post Graduate Doctorates, so its not that the Bible is wrong, rather knowledge is (in fact always) revealed in stages. Thus I think that the proof of Muhammad should solely be The Quran and Hadith, and we should only look at complimentary knowledge from the previous revelations, rather than choosing parts over which there could be conflict. My opinion, and as they say opinions are like....
A secondary point...we came back to evolution. Mehrosh asked how did the Universe evolve, well its true that to my mind the Universe began with a event, a singularity, what would commonly be called 'The Big Bang', but our stellar system evolved after that event. Our planets are far younger than the universe proper and underwent an evolution of their own. Life on the planet, well I would remind my Muslim brothers here....that we are not bound by the Genesis story....that is really for the Jews and Christians to try and understand, the Muslims have been freed from any duty to understand such things, and if they are wise they would stick to the Quran and Hadith. In Islam we are told that Allah uses means for all that occurs within the creation. We are also told that when Allah says 'Be' that it is. We are also told that Allah 'molded' Adam, then (presumambly when the 'clay' was perfected) he breathed Ruh (Spirit) into him. There is nothing in these teaching that contradicts what we are told by modern science. It may be that people think that when God says be in his realm that what he has commanded immediately occurs within our time frame, but this would almost be a subtle form of shirk, in that you attempt to attribute our perception of time to Allah. When God said be in his realm it could have manifest within linear time WITHIN the creation as 10 MIllion years.
I believe that Allah is the Infinite and Absolute that sustains and encompasses the creation, both the First heaven within the Kursi, and the creation hidden from our eyes up to the Arsh, up to Firdaus. Although I cannot prove this through scientific method I believe he was the cause of the fluctuation in the singularity that preceeded the big bang as the Quran states 'Once the heavens and the earth were joined together...then they were split apart' (paraphrased).