What's the point of discussing documented
history with one who denies everything not
supported by Zionist propaganda, eh.
You're confusing debate with denial. And you're running away from the argument because deep down you know you're going to lose, but you cannot admit to yourself that the loss will be because I am right and you are wrong.
The difference between us, in attitude, is that I am willing to have the discussion and I am willing to put my cards on the table. You are not. Either due to laziness, or perhaps it's the implications of being wrong that you are avoiding.
This is what I think. I think this hatred you have, ( and it is hate, it's nothing to be ashamed of. Everyone hates ) makes you feel alive. And if we discuss the details, your hate will diminish, it will be moderated, it will be reduced, and that hate is like a drug. You love it. It makes you feel alive.
Also, the feeling of being wise makes you feel alive. These things energize you. Psychologically. There is nothing wrong with it. It's a good thing. I want you to feel good. I want you to be happy, healthy and full of life. I
love that. L'Chayim! But. Not at my expense. Wisdom is expressed in platitudes lacking detail. When I bring details, you are not able to sound wise, and present yourself as a sort of every-man philosopher.
This is the trend. And it's 100% consistent and reliable. 100%. Any time I introduce detail it moderates your position. It doesn't disprove anything, but it throws metaphorical water on your passionate hate for what Israel is doing, and what you imagine Israel has been doing, and ultimately what you imagine Jews have been doing. That PASSION, is what makes you feel alive. If I throw water on it, you don't like that. Naturally.
It's the same for Jay. Jay is passionate about PURPOSE. That's what makes him feel alive. I'm generalizing. But if I introduce the opposing point of view, it reminds him, that his purpose is flawed, unjust, and in many ways cruel. That pours water on the fire of his passion. And that doesn't feel good.
Both of you are avoiding details, because criticizing feels so-so good. The passion makes you both feel alive. And I take that from both of you when I bring detail.
That is why I asked DS about the psychological reward. It's vital to have a fair discussion about this heated topic to acknowledge our passions. What is motivating us? What is rewarding to us? Why? Because if we are not careful,
Our perceptions are biased, shaped, in order to encourage the rewards we are seeking.