• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Poll: Are all carrots agnostic?

Are all carrots agnostic.

  • Yes: it's rooted in their character

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • Yes: because there was no historical Jesus

    Votes: 3 15.0%
  • Yes: and vegans are equally brainless

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • It depends on whether you mean 'hard agnostic' or 'soft agnostic'

    Votes: 5 25.0%

  • Total voters
    20

Amechania

Daimona of the Helpless
Actually, I've though about it and god is really more of a romanesco broccoli than a cauliflower. 90% of romanescos are Catholic compared to only 2% of carrots, according to Christianity Today.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
I think you people should be ashamed of yourselves for making fun of innocent root vegetables.

fant-me-profane-albums-1-picture4442-carrot.png




(mushy carrots)
 
Last edited:

Me Myself

Back to my username
Ahh, can carrots know enough that they don't know?

Carrots dont know cause they cant know.

According to the oxford dictionary, they cant be agnostic either because they would need to belief it is impossible to know (not simply not know)

They cant be atheists either because they are not persons.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
The question of whether or not carrots are agnostic is a red herring. Red is the color of communism. Communists are atheists. Therefore, carrots are atheists.

More seriously, how can a thing that doesn't think be accused of taking a thinking position on some subject.
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
The question of whether or not carrots are agnostic is a red herring. Red is the color of communism. Communists are atheists. Therefore, carrots are atheists.

Actually, that's a straw man. Carrots are orange, and orange is the color of non-theists on RF. Therefore, carrots are non-theists.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
The question of whether or not carrots are agnostic is a red herring. Red is the color of communism. Communists are atheists. Therefore, carrots are atheists.

More seriously, how can a thing that doesn't think be accused of taking a thinking position on some subject.

They are trying to equate the question to saying babies are atheists.

The point is moot, as agnosticism needs either a belief or doubt, while atheism needs only for it to be a person and lacking a belief.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
According to the oxford dictionary, they cant be agnostic either because they would need to belief it is impossible to know (not simply not know)
But the OED also offers, as one definition of agnostic (adj), "doubtful or noncommittal," and I've yet to hear a carrot commit one way or the other.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
But the OED also offers, as one definition of agnostic (adj), "doubtful or noncommittal," and I've yet to hear a carrot commit one way or the other.

Yu convinientyly forgot a word

Doubtful or noncommittal ATTITUDE.

If you are an animist and think carrots have attitudes, then sure, think on them as agnostic.
 

beenherebeforeagain

Rogue Animist
Premium Member
The question of whether or not carrots are agnostic is a red herring. Red is the color of communism. Communists are atheists. Therefore, carrots are atheists.

More seriously, how can a thing that doesn't think be accused of taking a thinking position on some subject.

As an animist, I must disagree--just because a being lacks an identifiable neural structure--nor a visible means to express itself--is not sufficient grounds for saying it is not aware and/or does not think. ;)
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
As an animist, I must disagree--just because a being lacks an identifiable neural structure--nor a visible means to express itself--is not sufficient grounds for saying it is not aware and/or does not think. ;)

But aren't you speaking now of Conservatives, rather than carrots?
 

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Staff member
Premium Member
I think the carrots I'm growing are very hardcore agnostics
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Because inexistence of belief is not at all symetrical with existence of belief.

One can (and in fact does) lack belief in a multitude of concepts that he never learned or that were never even conceived.

To claim belief in any concept, quite by contrast, demands having some sort of notion (even if a misguided one) of what that concept would be.

It does not even involve any kind of courtesy, just clarity of the concepts of belief and lack of belief.
"Not believing" doesn't represent an inexistence. Inexistence doesn't exist, but "not believing" does.
 
Top