That's irrelevant to the claim you made. I do not make this claim.
But, in general, you do indeed believe the Quran's eloquence marks it as divine? Correct?
"My position" is that you made a false assertion with no knowledge of anything in this subject so you are trying to turn it around to others dishonestly. So now you are trying to change "My position".
The evidence for that position is in this thread where it is evident you made claims made out of thin air but when asked how, a small query on your subject matter knowledge you are doing the burden of proof fallacy. Keep repeating it, so even you cant trace your fallacy.
Good grief, if you even spent 1/10th of the time reading carefully, thinking and engaging in good faith discussion as you do blowing your own trumpet, you might be less likely to miss the point quite so consistently.
Of course those were my own thoughts. There are no objective standards to identify whether a text is divine in origin. There are no experts. There is no go to textbook. Everyone is ultimately making claims out of thin air as they are all based on their own personal criteria.
As such, one person can make their subjective argument, and another can make theirs. People can decide which one they want to believe. Is this really that hard for you to understand?
What I said, divinity must be:
a) felt intuitively
b) identified based on a specific characteristic or characteristics that humans are not capable of producing - in which case what are they?
c) identified based on characteristics that humans are capable of producing but not to that standard, or in that number or combination. In which case there would have to be some "divine" threshold.
Seeing as I've never seen any evidence for B, and don't think C could make divinity more probable than human eloquence, I think a genuinely divine text should be pretty self-evident to anyone who can understand it. Before you start getting excited again, yes, this is a subjective opinion. Just like your one is and everyone else's.
Feel free to critique any of these points, identify which ones I have missed out or state your opinion on the topic. It's called discussion. Or you could just make another post saying nothing in an overweeningly pompous manner. Choice is yours