If I am lying why are you afraid to link the article?
I already linked it several pages ago. If you want to view it you do the work to go find it. If you want it done stop being lazy and do it yourself.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If I am lying why are you afraid to link the article?
I also refuted it several pages ago. The offer is still out there.I already linked it several pages ago. If you want to view it you do the work to go find it. If you want it done stop being lazy and do it yourself.
I also refuted it several pages ago. The offer is still out there.
And I did not merely deny early. That is what you have been doing every since the refutation.Denial is not refutation.
This circular logic of yours does not work.
Your offer is less valuable than soiled toilet paper.
And I did not merely deny early.
I say you could blame the parents themselves for creating, or probably more accurately exasperating those desires by vilifying the body.
Firstly, main point - porn shouldn't be controversial (outside of abuse cases, which are the legal systems..) but it is really terrible at it's job, so I don't endorse it.
The biggest danger of porn is the lack of quality or eroticism, it is just vapid, empty videos of people either touching their own organs or putting their organs into other human's organs and making comedic sounds that are intended to be interpreted by other humans as arousing - regardless if the actors are attractive or not (same goes for amateur films). Porn too, can never fulfill any of the beauty of real, genuine sex - or properly relieve one of one's tensions.
I believe sexuality is an immensely powerful thing (and a significant base of our psychology) but you gotta be real (those who claim to like porn) - Pornography is stupid, awkward and soulless.
As a person who has spent much time with studying filmmaking (actual cinema), I think every camera-man needs to be fired and sent to work at a garbage dump.
Sex/sexuality is the most beautiful and positive thing in the universe, yet we've still got far to improve (if pornography is any indication )
Due to the stigma against porn there is no investment into quality productions. Compare the budget of a porn movie to the budget of a Hollywood hit. There are often several orders of magnitude difference in the budgets. A movie that costs more than one hundred million dollars to produce is common place, A porn movie with over a $100,000 budget is a rarity.
And yes, compared to real sex porn runs worse than a distant second. But it still has its place. The important thing to do is to keep it in its place. It is fantasy of the same order as a Spiderman movie. Yes, there will be a few nuts that think Spiderman is real. And yes, there will be a few nuts that believe porn is real. Enjoy it for what it is. The good news is that with ever increasing acceptance there will be ever increasing quality.
I wasn't talking about quality via budget* but I agree.
*I was meaning quality of the genuine and/or erotic: - the layer that lies in real life passionate sex which instills emotions larger than simply just arousal (and I'm not just meaning dedicated marriages) - which is absent from 99.99% of porn, I doubt VR (as I've heard is becoming a thing) would care enough to it either.
Essentially, porn; is like watching a snail crawl across a floor. Real sex; is like parachuting out of a plane billions of miles in the air.
But I'm not meaning real vs fake in this particular comment - as movies can instill those emotions to an extent, it is in the power of art (which porn runs as far away from as it can, through it's lack-of-care approach)
After citing statistics that tell us that porn is not a problem, merely that many people have an interest in it, you then link to a bogus anti-porn article. Yes, lots of people watch lots of porn. And the stats that you used indicated that men do not watch what would be called "violent porn" that seems to be more of an interest to women, ironically enough. Psychologists that have more than a mere opinion do not seem to share your views as far as I can see.
If you can tone down your emotions a bit and waving your hands in terror because, once again, lots of people watch lots of porn, both men and women, you will see that the numbers of people watching it, and with obviously bad results, rape for instance, going down with the introduction of porn, and that it is not really a problem at all.
Depends on the porn. Some porn has artistic value. Erotica is really a form of porn, too, just "classier" and is usually considered art. The definitions of "pornography", "erotica" and "art" are subjective, anyway.I do not disagree with you at all. Porn has a long way to go before it can claim to be a genuine art form.
Real sex is mostly overrated. I've personally been content with watching porn and masturbating for a while now.I wasn't talking about quality via budget* but I agree.
*I was meaning quality of the genuine and/or erotic: - the layer that lies in real life passionate sex which instills emotions larger than simply just arousal (and I'm not just meaning dedicated marriages) - which is absent from 99.99% of porn, I doubt VR (as I've heard is becoming a thing) would care enough to it either.
Essentially: Porn; is like watching a snail crawl across a floor. Real sex; is like parachuting out of a plane billions of miles in the air.
But I'm not meaning real vs fake in this particular comment - as movies can instill those emotions to an extent, it is in the power of art (which porn runs as far away from as it can, through it's lack-of-care approach)
Real sex is mostly overrated. I've personally been content with watching porn and masturbating for a while now.
Sorry but this appears to be just an argument based upon emotion and myth.In reply to Subduction Zone:
I think the likelihood of rape being less due to the availability of porn can be made but that is only one aspect, and I would propose it is outweighed by all the negative effects. I know the same argument has been made for illegal images of children, for example - that any actual abuse might be lowered if we allowed a certain amount of this (virtual images for example), but the result of doing so would probably be far worse overall. The current amount and nature of internet pornography I would place in the same category as our contamination of the oceans and our lack of foresight with regards to space junk - we will inevitably pick up the tab later - or future generations will actually. And I believe religions fall into this category too, that is, that the deficits tend to outweigh any benefits overall.
Don't use me as an example for your anti-porn bull****. I've never really been a type to pursue sex and relationships, compared to my peers. Besides, a person isn't "broken" if they don't and if they are satisfied with giving themselves pleasure. At least the orgasm is guaranteed. Lol. Romantic relationships just aren't a priority in my life right now.I rest my case. Don
Sorry but this appears to be just an argument based upon emotion and myth.
Don't use me as an example for your anti-porn bull****. I've never really been a type to pursue sex and relationships, compared to my peers. Besides, a person isn't "broken" if they don't and if they are satisfied with giving themselves pleasure. At least the orgasm is guaranteed. Lol. Romantic relationships just aren't a priority in my life right now.