Which is your personal opinion. Does not mean they are comparable or the same, because they have a very different nature to take into consideration as well.both are disgusting and immoral.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Which is your personal opinion. Does not mean they are comparable or the same, because they have a very different nature to take into consideration as well.both are disgusting and immoral.
Your friend Esalam doesn't seem to agree. Is this the mainstream view?
Yes, don't these twins also share the same enviornment? The same study, as Kerr mentioned, showed that they were also equally or more likely to agree on extroversion, religiousity, bigotry, religious prejudice. Aren't these all factored largely by society?
Actually there is also another study by Dr. Whitehead (lol) who found identical twins to be 30% likely to be homosexual. Perhaps another indication of how little the effect Genetics play on sexual prefrences?
If you follow that definition abnormal does not need to be bad. Fact is it is quite neutral.Yes
"ab·nor·mal (b-nôrml)adj. Not typical, usual, or regular; not normal; deviant."
abnormal - definition of abnormal by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
Though if something is abnormal, then it doesn't necessarily mean that it is harmful (see redhead), that is just the connotation of the word and the thing that comes to mind.
Which is your personal opinion. Does not mean they are comparable or the same, because they have a very different nature to take into consideration as well.
Read Kerr's question again.
Which is basically the same thing. Let me ask you... why do you not think bestiality and hetrosexuality to be the same?
If you follow that definition abnormal does not need to be bad. Fact is it is quite neutral.
Though if something is abnormal, then it doesn't necessarily mean that it is harmful
I don't follow your logic...how does it lead to 2/3 chance of being homosexual?But you don't seem to understand that 30%, assuming that 10% of the population is gay (which, I think is a very high estimation), still means that 66,6% of the influence could be assigned to genetics.
I am tired, so I am slow ... I just do not get why the word even have relevance in that case?
I must ask again to those against homosexuality, because I am curious... considering your stance on homosexuality and hetrosexuality, what is your position on people who are not exclusively male or female? What do you think of their sexuality?
You're arguing over semantics again D:I am tired, so I am slow ... I just do not get why the word even have relevance in that case?
I know a few people who have gay parents(us backwoods Canadians let them get married) and I can say for a fact that this isn't true. none of them have commited suicide and they have never expressed any problems concerning their parents that aren't shared by children of hetero parents.
you can't know. this is exactly my point. that is how it is different. Homosexuals can talk. Dogs can't.
Enlighten me. How?
I beg to differ. Many people have entered a heterosexual marriage and had children before coming to terms with the fact that they are gay.
You didn't raise a concern, you made a statement, which is complete speculation. you have no case study or evidence for it. If you do have reference material about the mental state of children raised by same-sex parents now would be a good time to provide it.
me I don't follow your logic...how does it lead to 2/3 chance of being homosexual?
I must ask again to those against homosexuality, because I am curious... considering your stance on homosexuality and hetrosexuality, what is your position on people who are not exclusively male or female? What do you think of their sexuality?
everyone is male or female. have you seen anyone without any private parts?
What about those that are not aware of it?
Sheikh Jadul-Haq `Ali Jadul-Haq, former Grand Sheikh of Al-Azhar, on the modes of dealing with the hermaphrodite:
Islam urges Muslims to seek medication. When a trustworthy Muslim doctor decides that a certain operation is important for a patient, it becomes obligatory for the person concerned to carry out that operation. Among the religious rulings pertaining to the hermaphrodite is the one stating that a hermaphrodite is not allowed to mix with women, due to the fact that the gender has not been determined yet. The same thing explains the reason why it is not allowed for a hermaphrodite to mix with men. In case a hermaphrodite is in one place with women, he should be placed in front of them while when with men, he is to sit behind them.
Therefore, it is clear juristically that, given his/her yet undetermined gender, hermaphrodites cannot mix with either men or women until after medication, carried out by a Muslim and competent doctor, which will determine his/her sex. The prohibition of mixing with males or females aims at evading any corruption that may occur in that case.
Some people are born with both. Lady Gaga????? That awful singer off our radio?