• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Question about jesus.

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
There's the Jordan River, and there also were cisterns scattered around the country. I was in a "dig" in one of them back in 1998.
 

The Crimson Universe

Active Member
If Jesus lived in poverty.How did he wash his clothes?Or take baths or showers?:confused:

People washed their clothes in rivers, as in the Mediaeval Age and used various natural soaps they could make themselves. He would have bathed there as well.

Probably in a river.

Yes, probably in rivers. Also there was an Essene monastery just north-west of Dead Sea during Jesus's time. And there were baptismal baths in that monastery. So the members probably bathed there as well.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I still don't see "personal hygiene" listed in there. It lists three things: public health (sewers and sanitation and whatnot, as per the other article); pharmaceuticals (modern medicines); and other/unknown.

Can you find something that says we live longer because we obsessively bathe ourselves? Do you think shampooing your hair once a day is healthy for it, for instance? Is it good to strip the natural oils out of it, freaking the skin out to overproduce oils in order to compensate for that constant depletions of necessary healthy oil production?

I don't actually give a damn about what you see, i have provided links.

I am talking personal hygiene, not fanaticism
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Because there's no reference to his house and car? :D

Seriously, I think it's quite logical based on what he is reported to say that he was very much a "minimalist". If he wasn't, then what he spoke would have come off as being quite hypocritical.

I understand that, as an itinerate minister, he was a minimalist... but minimalist doesn't translate into poverty.

It would suggest that Joseph and Mary would have had a home... as a Jew that you are, who does the home go to when the father passes away?

But his message was about true riches that exceed the material riches, yet, he lived off the donations of those who had. So, he wasn't poor IMV.
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
If Jesus lived in poverty.How did he wash his clothes?Or take baths or showers?:confused:
Gee Frank, I never heard much of Jesus ever living in poverty and he had a lot of supporters who I'm sure would welcome the chance to assist him in normal ways. He probably had to deal with too much attention actually.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Poor is subjective, in this case.

I remember my daughter as she attended Florida Tech. The teacher made a comment of "I don't know how those people in Palm Bay live in those tiny houses. For her, my abode was a poverty home yet, in the eyes of the Hondurans, I was rich.

Jesus was The Word with all the privileges of a King and Creator. He was rich but went through the process of becoming poor. Paul said it this way:

5 Let this same attitude and purpose and [humble] mind be in you which was in Christ Jesus: [Let Him be your example in humility:] 6 Who, although being essentially one with God and in the form of God [possessing the fullness of the attributes which make God God], did not think this equality with God was a thing to be eagerly grasped orretained, 7 But stripped Himself [of all privileges and rightful dignity], so as to assume the guise of a servant (slave), in that He became like men and was born a human being.8 And after He had appeared in human form, He abased and humbled Himself [still further] and carried His obedience to the extreme of death, even the death of the cross! AMPC

So, one could say that he became poor at the cross.

while on this earth, he had enough finances to give to the poor:

Judas not only pilfered the money bag but it was said " John 13:29 Some thought that, since Judas had the money box (the purse), Jesus was telling him, Buy what we need for the Festival, or that he should give something to the poor."

Giving was accustomed by Jesus. So, not poor.
 
Not quite. You said "personal hygiene". That is not what they are saying:

Over the last 200 years, U.S. life expectancy has more than doubled to almost 80 years (78.8 in 2015), with vast improvements in health and quality of life. However, while most people imagine medical advancements to be the reason for this increase, the largest gain in life expectancy occurred between 1880 and 1920 due to public health improvements such as control of infectious diseases, more abundant and safer foods, cleaner water, and other nonmedical social improvements.​

I do not see "personal hygiene" listed there. Healthier environments, yes. No doubt. But that doesn't have to do with bathing twice a day. In fact, the opposite may be true as you end up killing off good bacteria that you need, what with all our obsessive antibacterial soap products and whatnot.

Source: 200 years of public health has doubled our life expectancy - San Juan Basin Public Health

Also if life expectancy was 40 it didn't mean most people died at 40, it meant a lot of children died at <10. If you survived to adulthood then you could expect to live significantly longer than 40.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
If Jesus lived in poverty. How did he wash his clothes?Or take baths or showers?:confused:
Jesus' family would have been average middle class in Nazareth up until his father died. Jesus himself worked until he began his public teaching at 31 years old. Jesus and the twelve fished and lived off of donations.
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I don't actually give a damn about what you see, i have provided links.

I am talking personal hygiene, not fanaticism
You clearly do give a damn. You want to be right, but the links you provided prove my point, not yours. It's simpler to just concede your point.
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Personal hygiene is not only showers but having clean hands.
True. But I believe cultures throughout the ages understand that you need to not eat food right after you poop, without attempting to clean your hands. :) Humans aren't that unaware of basic hygiene practices. People wouldn't live long enough to reproduce if we were that oblivious.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
You clearly do give a damn. You want to be right, but the links you provided prove my point, not yours. It's simpler to just concede your point.

Why? Just because you want to be right about poor hygiene. Sorry bud, my links showed how good personal hygiene has helped extend life expectancy considerably.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
True. But I believe cultures throughout the ages understand that you need to not eat food right after you poop, without attempting to clean your hands. :) Humans aren't that unaware of basic hygiene practices. People wouldn't live long enough to reproduce if we were that oblivious.

Wrong, it was the british army that introduces separation between toilet and food in the 18th century

And prior to that many people did not live long enough to reproduce
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Why? Just because you want to be right about poor hygiene. Sorry bud, my links showed how good personal hygiene has helped extend life expectancy considerably.

This is the entire content of what was in the link you provided:

Life expectancy in the US increased 3.3 years between 1990 and 2015, but the drivers of this increase are not well understood. We used vital statistics data and cause-deletion analysis to identify the conditions most responsible for changing life expectancy and quantified how public health, pharmaceuticals, other (nonpharmaceutical) medical care, and other/unknown factors contributed to the improvement. We found that twelve conditions most responsible for changing life expectancy explained 2.9 years of net improvement (85 percent of the total). Ischemic heart disease was the largest positive contributor to life expectancy, and accidental poisoning or drug overdose was the largest negative contributor. Forty-four percent of improved life expectancy was attributable to public health, 35 percent was attributable to pharmaceuticals, 13 percent was attributable to other medical care, and −7 percent was attributable to other/unknown factors. Our findings emphasize the crucial role of public health advances, as well as pharmaceutical innovation, in explaining improving life expectancy.
Can you please point to "Personal Hygrine" in this article? You say it's there. I don't see it. If it's there, where is it?

In fact the use of antibiotic soaps are detrimental to public health, if you are unaware of this: Antibacterial Soap? You Can Skip It, Use Plain Soap and Water

I'm willing to concede my point, if you can provide actual information to support your claim. So far, that is missing in your links.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
This is the entire content of what was in the link you provided:

Life expectancy in the US increased 3.3 years between 1990 and 2015, but the drivers of this increase are not well understood. We used vital statistics data and cause-deletion analysis to identify the conditions most responsible for changing life expectancy and quantified how public health, pharmaceuticals, other (nonpharmaceutical) medical care, and other/unknown factors contributed to the improvement. We found that twelve conditions most responsible for changing life expectancy explained 2.9 years of net improvement (85 percent of the total). Ischemic heart disease was the largest positive contributor to life expectancy, and accidental poisoning or drug overdose was the largest negative contributor. Forty-four percent of improved life expectancy was attributable to public health, 35 percent was attributable to pharmaceuticals, 13 percent was attributable to other medical care, and −7 percent was attributable to other/unknown factors. Our findings emphasize the crucial role of public health advances, as well as pharmaceutical innovation, in explaining improving life expectancy.
Can you please point to "Personal Hygrine" in this article? You say it's there. I don't see it. If it's there, where is it?

In fact the use of antibiotic soaps are detrimental to public health, if you are unaware of this: Antibacterial Soap? You Can Skip It, Use Plain Soap and Water

I'm willing to concede my point, if you can provide actual information to support your claim. So far, that is missing in your links.


The links i provided, note the plural

Forty-four percent of improved life expectancy was attributable to public health

And

See also How Personal Hygiene Extends Life Expectancy and Affects Health
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
The links i provided, note the plural

Forty-four percent of improved life expectancy was attributable to public health

And

See also How Personal Hygiene Extends Life Expectancy and Affects Health
I hadn't seen that 2nd link. Thank for that. However, it does not say it doubled our life expectancy, as you claimed. From that link:

They found that their lack of access to proper sanitation measures as well as unclean water were two of the most prevalent causes of these infections. So, in order to help, they sent soap as well as piped in clean water to many areas and found that there was a significant decrease in the amount of deaths. Not to mention, that these measures actually helped to improve the life expectancy of the community by about 5-10 years.
Not to mention, that these measures actually helped to improve the life expectancy of the community by about 5-10 years.
But the reality is, it is public health, such as sanitation systems that cause this to happen, which point I agreed with already.

Obsessing over bathing twice a day, shampoos, soaps, soaps, soaps, and smelling like a fresh spring day, has little to do with any of this.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I hadn't seen that 2nd link. Thank for that. However, it does not say it doubled our life expectancy, as you claimed. From that link:

They found that their lack of access to proper sanitation measures as well as unclean water were two of the most prevalent causes of these infections. So, in order to help, they sent soap as well as piped in clean water to many areas and found that there was a significant decrease in the amount of deaths. Not to mention, that these measures actually helped to improve the life expectancy of the community by about 5-10 years.
Not to mention, that these measures actually helped to improve the life expectancy of the community by about 5-10 years.
But the reality is, it is public health, such as sanitation systems that cause this to happen, which point I agreed with already.

Obsessing over bathing twice a day, shampoos, soaps, soaps, soaps, and smelling like a fresh spring day, has little to do with any of this.

Why keep harping to obsession? Most people are not obsessed but keep themselves clean
 
Top