Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.

[SavedByTheLord]

Oh boy! Multiple questions and poorly asked to. I will answer the one about polystrate trees again:

I answer it easily.

Why is there too much C-14 in some samples of coal and fossilized wood?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Why is there too much C-14 in some samples of coal and fossilized wood?

There isn't. Show a valid peer review article that says such things were found.

Do you understand the concept of a margin of error? Do you understand that samples, especially samples from incompetent people can be contaminated?

If creationists used proper scientific methods, and properly documented it, and still got the same results they could publish in peer reviewed journals.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

There isn't. Show a valid peer review article that says such things were found.

Do you understand the concept of a margin of error? Do you understand that samples, especially samples from incompetent people can be contaminated?

If creationists used proper scientific methods, and properly documented it, and still got the same results they could publish in peer reviewed journals.

There are many books, sites, scientific and papers that have answers.

 

[Subduction Zone]

There are many books, sites, scientific and papers that have answers.

Then find, quote and link a valid one. Empty claims are worthless.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Falsehoods are from evolutionists who are deceived and deceiving.

How does one explain soft tissue and blood vessels in dinosaur tissue?

CC371.1: Tyrannosaurus tissues from bone

You really, really, really need to read through that site.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

CC371.1: Tyrannosaurus tissues from bone

You really, really, really need to read through that site.

I read and they have the same bias as you .

Haeckel’s drawings were not accurate, yet his drawings are still used for evolution. Why the fraud?

 

[SkepticThinker]

Would you accept the explanation from a Christian scientist?

Mary Schweitzer, perhaps?

 

[Subduction Zone]

CC371.1: Tyrannosaurus tissues from bone

You really, really, really need to read through that site.

I don't think it will do any good. He is so deep in da Nile. I hope that a crocodile doesn't get him.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I read and they have the same bias as you .

My bias is towards whatever the evidence indicates.

I don't believe for one second that you read that. You didn't have time.

Haeckel’s drawings were not accurate, yet his drawings are still used for evolution. Why the fraud?

Nope. I'm not Gish Galloping along with you.

I guarantee this claim is on the site I keep telling you to read over. Just like every single other one you've tried here.

An Index to Creationist Claims

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Then find, quote and link a valid one. Empty claims are worthless.

Find a link from a non deceived source.

Where are all the remains of all the people that have died?

 

[SkepticThinker]

There are many books, sites, scientific and papers that have answers.

Should be super duper easy to produce some then, eh?

 

[Subduction Zone]

I read and they have the same bias as you .


Haeckel’s drawings were not accurate, yet his drawings are still used for evolution. Why the fraud?

Oh, you mean that they follow the scientific method?

And you have not proven any fraud when it comes to Haeckel.

Sounds like projection on your part again.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Find a link from a non deceived source.

Where are all the remains of all the people that have died?

They rotted away. Even the Bible tells you that.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Oh, you mean that they follow the scientific method?

And you have not proven any fraud when it comes to Haeckel.

Sounds like projection on your part again.

Haeckel had fake drawings of embryos. Phots disagree with his fake drawings.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Why is there too much C-14 in some samples of coal and fossilized wood?

CD011.5: C14 date of Triassic wood

www.talkorigins.org

 

[Subduction Zone]

Haeckel had fake drawings of embryos. Phots disagree with his fake drawings.

No, that is not what he did wrong.

Do your homework. His drawings were for the most part very accurate.

 

[Subduction Zone]

CD011.5: C14 date of Triassic wood

www.talkorigins.org

He won't even bother. He is too afraid.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I read and they have the same bias as you .

Haeckel’s drawings were not accurate, yet his drawings are still used for evolution. Why the fraud?

CB701: Haeckel's embryo pictures.

www.talkorigins.org

 

[SavedByTheLord]

No, that is not what he did wrong.

Do your homework. His drawings were for the most part very accurate.

Here is your homework assignment. I will grade it.

Where did the universe come from?

If the explanation is the Bing Bang with or without inflation, what was there before that?

If there was nothing before the Big Bang, then that breaks cause and effect. It also violates every law of conservation too.

If there was something before that, what caused the thing that was before the Big Bang to come into being?

If that thing always existed, that violates the law of increasing entropy.

If that thing has not always existed, what was there before the thing that was prior our universe to come into being?

Please continue this until you get something that has always been.

And then that will violate the law of increasing entropy.



If you believe the redshift con job, the universe, space itself, has been expanding a lot less than the speed of light for billions of years. And even the space where the most distant galaxies exist, is expanding less than the speed of light and they were the earliest.

It is a failure of the Big Bang model. The size of the universe is supposedly 94 billion light years, and the universe is supposedly 13.7 billion years old. The universe, and thus space itself, is expanding at a rate less the speed of light. The space itself is expanding less that the speed of light. How could the universe be 7x larger in light years than its age? In 13.7 billion years it should have expanded less than 13.7 billion light years vs 94 billion light years.

In fact, many are now finding irrefutable proof that the redshift theory is false, that the universe is not expanding at all, and that there was no Big Bang. Many are refuting the Big Bang, and they are not just YEC scientists.

Now Inflation is just the Big Fudge Factors so they can try to fine tune their theory to explain major contradictions to the Big Hoax of the Big Bang. So, if inflation is true, answer these required questions.

When did inflation start? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.

What caused it to start? Of course, this violates cause and effect.

When did inflation end? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.

What caused it to end? Of course, this violates cause and effect.

Please provide a graph of the acceleration due to inflation vs time graph, as it must meet ALL the facts.

What is the mass energy of the inflation particle or is it 2 particles, one to start and one to end?

Why have they not found the inflation particle yet?



Where did the laws of nature come from?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?



Where did the laws of nature come from?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Here is your homework assignment. I will grade it.

Where did the universe come from?

If the explanation is the Bing Bang with or without inflation, what was there before that?

If there was nothing before the Big Bang, then that breaks cause and effect. It also violates every law of conservation too.

If there was something before that, what caused the thing that was before the Big Bang to come into being?

If that thing always existed, that violates the law of increasing entropy.

If that thing has not always existed, what was there before the thing that was prior our universe to come into being?

Please continue this until you get something that has always been.

And then that will violate the law of increasing entropy.



If you believe the redshift con job, the universe, space itself, has been expanding a lot less than the speed of light for billions of years. And even the space where the most distant galaxies exist, is expanding less than the speed of light and they were the earliest.

It is a failure of the Big Bang model. The size of the universe is supposedly 94 billion light years, and the universe is supposedly 13.7 billion years old. The universe, and thus space itself, is expanding at a rate less the speed of light. The space itself is expanding less that the speed of light. How could the universe be 7x larger in light years than its age? In 13.7 billion years it should have expanded less than 13.7 billion light years vs 94 billion light years.

In fact, many are now finding irrefutable proof that the redshift theory is false, that the universe is not expanding at all, and that there was no Big Bang. Many are refuting the Big Bang, and they are not just YEC scientists.

Now Inflation is just the Big Fudge Factors so they can try to fine tune their theory to explain major contradictions to the Big Hoax of the Big Bang. So, if inflation is true, answer these required questions.

When did inflation start? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.

What caused it to start? Of course, this violates cause and effect.

When did inflation end? The exact timing is crucial as it must meet ALL the facts.

What caused it to end? Of course, this violates cause and effect.

Please provide a graph of the acceleration due to inflation vs time graph, as it must meet ALL the facts.

What is the mass energy of the inflation particle or is it 2 particles, one to start and one to end?

Why have they not found the inflation particle yet?



Where did the laws of nature come from?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?



Where did the laws of nature come from?

Where did all matter come from? Where did antimatter?

Where did all energy come from?

Where did all the protons come from? neutrons? photons? neutrinos? All the quarks? Gluons? Muons? All the anti-particles?

Where did the gravitation force come from? The strong force? The weak force? The electromagnetic force?

Sorry, you are using a technique that refutes God.

And you forgot that you are incompetent when it comes to the sciences. You cannot judge anything.

Of course that does tell us quite a bit about why you keep calling your God a liar.