• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Questions that evolutionists and billions of years proponents cannot answer but disprove their theories.

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
@Little Dragon , did you read the source you posted?

From your own source:

“Bible scholar Dr Lydia McGrew studies and writes about the Gospels…..
McGrew suggests that when sources are generally shown to be reliable, one allows them the benefit of the doubt when apparent contradictions arise, and assumes that the error is probably on one’s understanding of the passage rather than the passage itself.

Have you ‘studied’ the Bible?
If not, how would you know if she is right or wrong?

Also from your source:
Dr. Lydia McGrew (above) and “Dr. Michael Licona,…a reputable New Testament scholar,…agree that the New Testament is generally historically reliable….

This statement by itself seems to nullify any further claims that there are substantial errors in the Greek Scriptures.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Nope.
George.
And somewhere in the first ten generations there is a Fred and a Max, but I do not remember off the top my head where in the top ten they fall.
What caused the Big Bang and where did all the fine tuned orderly laws come from?
It is delusion to be believe it just popped into existence or has always existed?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
@Little Dragon , did you read the source you posted?

From your own source:

“Bible scholar Dr Lydia McGrew studies and writes about the Gospels…..
McGrew suggests that when sources are generally shown to be reliable, one allows them the benefit of the doubt when apparent contradictions arise, and assumes that the error is probably on one’s understanding of the passage rather than the passage itself.

Have you ‘studied’ the Bible?
If not, how would you know if she is right or wrong?

Also from your source:
Dr. Lydia McGrew (above) and “Dr. Michael Licona,…a reputable New Testament scholar,…agree that the New Testament is generally historically reliable….

This statement by itself seems to nullify any further claims that there are substantial errors in the Greek Scriptures.
Generally does not mean error free. I do not understand why so many believers insist upon black and white fallacies. For example those scholars would probably both agree that that there is a ten year difference in the dates of Jesus's birth between the nativity tale told in Matthew and the one told in Luke. And if pressed they would probably say that both are false.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
The total number of ordered sequences of amino acids in the DNA, RNA, and proteins in all living creatures that have ever lived would be more that 10^(10^44) .
The odds against just that information content evolving would be more 10(10^44) to 1. And the odds against all the atoms associated with that would be more than 10^(10^47) to 1.
These are so vast that it is very near impossible to comprehend.
I guess it's a good thing then that evolution doesn't work like that

But how would you know that, off course, with your allergy to learning
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
What caused the Big Bang and where did all the fine tuned orderly laws come from?
It is delusion to be believe it just popped into existence or has always existed?
Here is something to make your brain go POP


Always = a period of a time. All of time, to be exact.
Time = finite into the past.
The beginning of the universe = T=0; the beginning of time.
Go back and point to any point in time. The universe existed then.

Conclusion:
At any time in the past, the universe existed.
Hence, the universe existed for all of time.
And as we have seen above: all of time = always.

So from this follows:

The universe has always existed.

I will wait while you scrap your brain from that wall it was splattered against.
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
Here is something to make your brain go POP


Always = a period of a time. All of time, to be exact.
Time = finite into the past.
The beginning of the universe = T=0; the beginning of time.
Go back and point to any point in time. The universe existed then.

Conclusion:
At any time in the past, the universe existed.
Hence, the universe existed for all of time.
And as we have seen above: all of time = always.

So from this follows:

The universe has always existed.

I will wait while you scrap your brain from that wall it was splattered against.
And what caused that finely tuned and orderly universe to be at that finite time in the past?
 

SavedByTheLord

Well-Known Member
This is a poorly asked question. You need to prove that the universe is "finely tuned and orderly". That is pretty much a worthless claim if you cannot support it.

Run away!!
What caused the universe to come into being and what caused the laws of nature to come into being? Is that better?

BTW they are fine tuned and orderly.
 
Top