Hey man, don't underestimate the value of selective breading. Taste matters.Tip: always a good idea to read a post before typing an 'answer'.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hey man, don't underestimate the value of selective breading. Taste matters.Tip: always a good idea to read a post before typing an 'answer'.
There are just adaptations within created kinds, aka micro evolution.
No one has ever observed one created kind turning into another created kind.
To assume that more changes will do that is projection outside of the measured or observe range.
It is very bad science to do so.
Owkay. lol.For example, the force needed to pull a spring is proportional to its distance.
F = kx
until breaks.
End proof.
People have bred dogs for many years and some a very large.
But what limits them from making even larger dogs?
Sure, sure. Point?Because eventually that dog line will become less fit and prone to many problems. That is the spring breaks.
Projection outside of measured of observed ranges is pseudo science.
So macro evolution is falsified .
so, if selective breading does no work, what will make a very large dog?
There are no super giant dogs
This is observed in all species.
I have just falsified forever macroevolution.
Are you capable of sticking to a topic?I have already falsified abiogenesis,
I have already falsified the Big Bang.
How did the moon come into being?
However the Bible is quite clear and so there is just one faith.
I notced you didn't answer Blu's questions. If there is a problem and you lack answers then let us know.How do you account for the Jewish faith then? After all, it's their Tanakh, not the Christians'.
How do you account for the distinction between Eastern Orthodoxy in its various forms, and Western Christianity?
Within Western Christianity how do you account for the schism between Catholic and Protestant?
Within Protestant Christianity, how do account for the difference between science-accepting and anti-science insisting (like yourself)?
However the Bible is quite clear and so there is just one faith.
I notced you didn't answer Blu's questions. If there is a problem and you lack answers then let us know.How do you account for the Jewish faith then? After all, it's their Tanakh, not the Christians'.
How do you account for the distinction between Eastern Orthodoxy in its various forms, and Western Christianity?
Within Western Christianity how do you account for the schism between Catholic and Protestant?
Within Protestant Christianity, how do account for the difference between science-accepting and anti-science insisting (like yourself)?
Behold the mighty prophecy of TagliatelliMonster's words of wisdom.I notced you didn't answer Blu's questions. If there is a problem and you lack answers then let us know.
Behold the mighty prophecy of TagliatelliMonster's words of wisdom.
Verily, I say unto you that @SavedByTheLord shall not directly respond to questions.
Verily, I say unto you that @SavedByTheLord shall completely ignore any and all direct arguments and evidence.
Verily, I say unto you that @SavedByTheLord shall instead repeat his mantra of off topic broken record questions and attempt to change the topic and move the goalposts.
O ye believers, you shall see I bring you true words of wisdom and you shall know that I am THE LORD when all these things shall come to pass.
O ye believers, do not follow in the footsteps the unbelievers for they have been deceived by the Father of Lies, by the Great Deceiver, by my arch enemy known as Bubble Of Makebelief. Fall not for the evil of BUM.
O ye believers, I raise my pint in honor of your intellectual integrity and shall pour some of my blessed mead on the ground as a symbol for the neural networks lost to the BUM.
If however, a disbeliever has a change of hearts and breaks free from the Great Deceiver, then we shall feast in his/her honor with Tagliatelli and Meatbals and swim in rivers of beer.
Ramen
- Everything we know about the Big Bang could be wrong | Salon.com
- Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered - threat of ‘scientific crisis’ | Science | News | Express.co.uk
- Top Ten Scientific Flaws In The Big Bang Theory | TechReader
- The Big Bang Never Happened: A Conclusive Argument
Is that the noodles talking?O ye believers, you shall see I bring you true words of wisdom and you shall know that I am THE LORD when all these things shall come to pass.
Ramen
That's you demonstrating my impeccable prophetic abilities.Is that the noodles talking?
Oopsy, you just repeated the exact same thing again, instead of responding to the points put before you.As always evolutionists cannot admit they have nothing.
It is a fallacy to believe that any form of projection, especially linear projection, outside of the measured or observed range is valid.
There are just adaptations within created kinds, aka micro evolution.
No one has ever observed one created kind turning into another created kind. To assume that more changes will do that is projection outside of the measured or observe range.
It is very bad science to do so.
For example, the force needed to pull a spring is proportional to its distance.
F = kx
until breaks.
End proof.
I did.Oopsy, you just repeated the exact same thing again, instead of responding to the points put before you.
You think this is a proof? Yikes.Sure there is an analogy to a spring breaking.
People have bred dogs for many years and some a very large.
But what limits them from making even larger dogs?
Because eventually that dog line will become less fit and prone to many problems. That is the spring breaks.
Projection outside of measured of observed ranges is pseudo science.
So macro evolution is falsified .
End proof.
Artificial selection works. It wouldn't work if evolution and natural selection weren't a fact of life.If selective breading won’t work, what will?
There are no super giant dogs because any changes beyond a certain point break the spring.
This is observed in all species.
There are lots of huge dogs. You should get out more. There are a lot of tiny dogs too.If selective breading won’t work, what will?
There are no super giant dogs because any changes beyond a certain point break the spring.
This is observed in all species.
I now you repeated yourself. It's like, your M.O.I did.
It's not, as you've demonstrated.The spring analogy is a good analogy,
"Kind" is a vague and ambiguous religious word that has no actual meaning in science.but it is not needed to refute macro evolution (one kind evolving into another kind).
The observation is that no one has ever seen one kind change into another kind.You think this is a proof? Yikes.
As every other poster on this thread has pointed out to you, nobody who understands evolution expects to see one "kind" turn into another "kind."The observation is that no one has ever seen one kind change into another kind.
An analysis of genetics shows a nested hierarchy of varying degrees of relatedness between all creatures on earth.An analysis of the genetics proves that too.
Where are people going to keep these super giant dogs you're so obsessed with?But what limits them from making even larger dogs?
That's because traits are being artificially selected for by humans seeking out traits that are desirable to them, rather than nature selecting traits that help the dog survive in the wild (which they can't do).Because eventually that dog line will become less fit and prone to many problems. That is the spring breaks.
All you've demonstrated here is that you have no idea what macroevolution is in the first place.Projection outside of measured of observed ranges is pseudo science.
So macro evolution is falsified .
I already informed you that if such a thing would happen, evolution would be disproven.(one kind evolving into another kind).