And after all this time, you've still never provided any evidence at all that anybody anywhere has ever raped somebody mainly because they were super horny. Not even anecdotal evidence.
Why should I consider to your opinion when a) it is contrary to every study I'm aware of on the subject and b) you don't back it up with any evidence?
"The research and literature from over the past few decades has amounted to a wealth of information that can aid us in understanding the sexual fantasies of sex offenders and how they interact with other important factors involved in sexual offending. Although the majority of studies have used various methods of measurement (e.g., questionnaires, interviews, phallometry), differ in terms of focus (e.g., frequency, content, function), and differ in terms of offender (e.g., rapists, child molesters), when examined collectively, they provide valuable insight into the multifaceted nature of deviant sexual fantasies...
Second, we discussed the relationship between sexual fantasy and sexual arousal/interest, and focussed on two recently proposed theories in order to unpack the possible role of cognition in this relationship. The first was the cognitive-affective model of sexual arousal (Janssen et al., 2000), in which sexual fantasy plays a number of possible roles in the appraisal of sexual stimuli. The second was the extended mind theory (Ward & Casey, 2010) from which we hypothesized that both the internal and external elements of an offender's cognitive structure are required in order to produce and experience a more sexually arousing fantasy. This theory can be used to understand the relationship between deviant fantasies and pornography (and other external elements) that goes beyond disinhibition (see also Wilson & Jones, 2008)...
Finally, we discussed some of the research and theory regarding the contentious relationship between fantasy and behavior. Based on the existing literature, the use of deviant fantasies can both indirectly increase the risk of deviant behavior occurring (distal influence) and directly affect it (proximal influence). Furthermore, theory and research indicates that the motivation of the offender (e.g., avoidant vs. approach) dictates how sexual fantasy may affect behavior.."
Bartels, R. M., & Gannon, T. A. (2011). Understanding the sexual fantasies of sex offenders and their correlates.
Aggression and Violent Behavior,
16(6), 551-561.
Ryan, K. M. (2004). Further evidence for a cognitive component of rape.
Aggression and Violent Behavior,
9(6), 579-604.
"Researchers have consistently found that men tend to rate their own and other men and women's behavior more sexually than women do (Abbey, 1982, Abbey, 1987, Shotland and Craig, 1988 and Vrij and Kirby, 2002). More recently, research has expanded on these findings by going beyond simple gender differences and examining specific attitudes and beliefs that may drive an overperception bias among men. For example, Fisher and Walters (2003) examined individual and situational characteristics that influence men and women's interpretations of individuals sexual interest. They found that gender was not the only determinant of sexualized perceptions. Although men were more likely to interpret sexual intentions than women, men with calloused sexual attitudes, more traditional beliefs about women's roles, and lower social desirability concerns were most likely to report sexual interpretations of behavior than women or other men."
Kolivas, E. D., & Gross, A. M. (2007). Assessing sexual aggression: Addressing the gap between rape victimization and perpetration prevalence rates.
Aggression and Violent Behavior,
12(3), 315-328.
"Rape became a public and academic focus following the publication of Brownmiller's (1975) book, Against our will: Men, women, and rape. Brownmiller argued that rape is a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear (p. 15, emphasis in original). Since then, feminist theories of rape have dominated the rape research literature. A prominent version of feminist theory contends that rape is the result of social traditions in which men have dominated political, economic, and other sources of power (Ellis, 1989).
Feminist theorists inspired by Brownmiller often interpret rape as a method by which men secure and maintain this power and dominance over women. Moreover, feminist theorists have argued explicitly that rape is not sexual in nature, and they often seem more focused on making ideological, rather than scientific, statements about human psychology and behavior (Thornhill & Palmer, 2000). These interpretations also ignore the existence of rape behaviors in many nonhuman species. Recently, researchers have begun to examine human rape from an evolutionary psychological perspective informed by comparative and other research."
McKibbin, W. F., & Shackelford, T. K. (2011). Women's avoidance of rape.
Aggression and Violent Behavior,
16(5), 437-443.
.....a perspective like this is refreshing.