TLK Valentine
Read the books that others would burn.
Ok might I ask what you think that wrong message might be?
Ask the Republican party -- They're the ones against "handouts."
I remember learning about Machiavelli when I was in school. I was slightly fascinated. I also wonder about kings and queens and other things like that.
Not sure I see the connection here.
For instance here where we live there are many low paid workers who work very hard for rich people. And/or corporations.
That's because most of the western hemisphere lives in a post-industrial, service-based economy.
If you're a high-class corporate wheeler and dealer, you spend your days on the phone negotiating million-dollar deals. You don't know how to change a tire or fix a toilet, but the good news is, you don't have to -- you make enough money to hire people to do that for you when the need arises.
That's how your world works: The more deals you close, the more money you make, the more peasants you can hire to change your tires and fix your toilets.
Keep in mind, that's how the world works... until one day it doesn't:
When I worked for a educational corporation I always wondered about that. I know it sounds strange, or doesn't it, but highly paid workers were not those cleaning bathrooms. But it was a necessary job. Both were, I might add.
One thing COVID did for the country (and arguably the world) was show us which jobs were really necessary. In a lockdown, you can make your million-dollar deals just as easily from home as you can from your office... you're safe, but when your tire needs changing or your toilet needs fixing, it was the "peasants" putting their health on the line for you.
"Essential workers," we called them -- and now that the pandemic is behind us, they want to keep being treated as "essential..." and being paid as "essential" workers should be is also something they'd like, thankyouverymuch.
The nerve of some people, eh? The unmitigated gall...
At the time he didn't know. Things happened since he went back to heaven, wouldn't you agree?
He didn't know, but he told his disciples that their generation would not pass away until it all happened. (Mark 13:30, Matthew 24:34, Luke 21:32)
Needless to say, their generation passed away and things kept on keeping on... clearly some reinterpretation was in order.
Interestingly enough, John's Gospel omitted that prophecy -- ever wonder why?
I have a theory: We already know that John was written last, possibly as late as AD 90-110... by which time, Jesus' generation had already passed away. No point in including a prophecy which clearly had already gone bust, is there?