Regarding Islamic terrorism, what does 'radicalized' mean?

[stevecanuck]

Russia considers it's war against the west as a holy war now. If Iran was set to fight all disbelievers, why are they on good terms with Russia and China? Maybe disbelievers vs believers is not the only dynamic.

US is ruled by rich freemasons and Zionists. Their empire is falling and their propaganda is diminishing. No one cares who you label terrorists.

I see you've decided to end your friendly facade and have instead gone full jihad.

 

[Link]

Common enemies make allies. Happens all the time. No mystery. No 'ah-hah' moment.

I agree with you. So why is US a common enemy?

 

[Link]

I see you've decided to end your friendly facade and have instead gone full jihad.

You know once I use to believe there was hope of convincing the west to be benevolent in their foreign policy. But I no longer believe that. I also believe Bani-Israel per Quran most of them are now freemasons and the proof of this is that it says they followed sorcery that is attributed to Solomon's (a) authority and the key of Solomon is that book that is still believed by freemasons today.

I don't think most of Bani-Israel remained Jewish, but most became masonic. I think the two fasads talked about in Surah Isra is lead by freemasons.

At the end, no victory will occur except when Imam Mahdi (a) comes. The path to me is bracing for impact and calling to justice till he comes and takes the flag from our fallible leaders and the leadership is back to God's chosen.

 

[libre]

I hope my fellow unbelievers note that @Link has just confirmed that Islamic terrorists who kill unbelievers according to Allah's dictates in the Qur'an will go to paradise.

I find it interesting that you've decided to take his word for it.

 

[Link]

If you could kill every Jew in Israel, would you do it?

No I wouldn't. Iran's policy has always been to end apartheid, which, means Jews and Palestinians live in same country. Khamanei (h) has explained "death to Israel" means end of oppression and end of apartheid and "death to US" means end of Bolton's and his likes' foreign policies.

 

[Link]

I agree with you. So why is US a common enemy?

If you say because they are "disbelievers", then why are not Russia and China seen as enemies?

 

[stevecanuck]

I agree with you. So why is US a common enemy?

Because you say it is.

The U.S. would like nothing better than having the world at peace. Iran and Russia, not so much.

You and your friends are the problem.

 

[stevecanuck]

You know once I use to believe there was hope of convincing the west to be benevolent in their foreign policy. But I no longer believe that. I also believe Bani-Israel per Quran most of them are now freemasons and the proof of this is that it says they followed sorcery that is attributed to Solomon's (a) authority and the key of Solomon is that book that is still believed by freemasons today.

I don't think most of Bani-Israel remained Jewish, but most became masonic. I think the two fasads talked about in Surah Isra is lead by freemasons.

At the end, no victory will occur except when Imam Mahdi (a) comes. The path to me is bracing for impact and calling to justice till he comes and takes the flag from our fallible leaders and the leadership is back to God's chosen.

There won't be peace until Muslims take the 732 calendar off their wall and replace it with one that says 2024.

The legacy of one man from 1400 years ago is ruining the world.

 

[stevecanuck]

I find it interesting that you've decided to take his word for it.

The time for such denial should be long past. Read the news.

 

[stevecanuck]

No I wouldn't. Iran's policy has always been to end apartheid, which, means Jews and Palestinians live in same country. Khamanei (h) has explained "death to Israel" means end of oppression and end of apartheid and "death to US" means end of Bolton's and his likes' foreign policies.

You left out "under Islamic rule".

 

[Link]

Because you say it is.

The U.S. would like nothing better than having the world at peace. Iran and Russia, not so much.

You and your friends are the problem.

This the issue. I realistically realize both the mischief maker and the resistance to that, see themselves as advocates of peace, stability and well being. But in reality, you have to look at evidence and not lie to yourself. One is truthful and the other deceives themselves.

This is one reason why revelations of God are needed. They make us hold ourselves accountable and measure ourselves till we are truthful. Otherwise, in conflicts all sides believe they are right.

Also, the leader of our time has his tricks just as freemasons have their tricks. There is a hidden war beneath it all.

US foreign policy is obviously the problem. But I understand to people who lie to themselves, they won't see that.

 

[Link]

Caprice blinds people to truth. This is why bias against truth not only leads to rejecting Prophets and leaders appointed by God and God's books, but also leads to supporting oppressors and their evil ways.

This proves that it's not okay to follow falsehoods out of caprice, because, it leads to people being blind to truth in conflicts as well. And supporting oppressors over the oppressed.

 

[LuisDantas]

It all comes down to discernment, as one would expect.

Scriptures have none; they are not sentient.

Despite common and very popular beliefs to the contrary, it falls for the adherents to decide whether to validate doctrines and scriptures; to which extent; and with which provisos and exceptions.

The idea that there is some doctrine and/or scripture somewhere that "does not need" that care and responsibility may be appealling, but it is not reasonable, and it is definitely not realistic.

 

[stevecanuck]

If you say because they are "disbelievers", then why are not Russia and China seen as enemies?

If you don't like an answer you just repeat the question.

Again - common enemies make allies. Just think WWII, the Allies and the USSR. 'Allies' and 'friends' don't always mean the same thing.

 

[Link]

If you don't like an answer you just repeat the question.

Again - common enemies make allies. Just think WWII, the Allies and the USSR. 'Allies' and 'friends' don't always mean the same thing.

You make it as if it's all about belief and disbelief. My answer to that, is if disbelievers was the sole issue (kill all unbelievers in your words), then why isn't Iran fighting Russia and China?

They don't chant death to Russia or China. Why is that?

 

[stevecanuck]

You make it as if it's all about belief and disbelief. My answer to that, is if disbelievers was the sole issue (kill all unbelievers in your words), then why isn't Iran fighting Russia and China?

They don't chant death to Russia or China. Why is that?

Same Same Same. Do better.

 

[Link]

Same Same Same. Do better.

I understand you said enemies of enemy become allies. My question is why have they singled out US as the enemy to ally with other nations and not other disbelieving nations?

You saying we aren't necessarily friends. Okay. But why is US singled out?

 

[Mock Turtle]

You know once I use to believe there was hope of convincing the west to be benevolent in their foreign policy. But I no longer believe that. I also believe Bani-Israel per Quran most of them are now freemasons and the proof of this is that it says they followed sorcery that is attributed to Solomon's (a) authority and the key of Solomon is that book that is still believed by freemasons today.

I don't think most of Bani-Israel remained Jewish, but most became masonic. I think the two fasads talked about in Surah Isra is lead by freemasons.

At the end, no victory will occur except when Imam Mahdi (a) comes. The path to me is bracing for impact and calling to justice till he comes and takes the flag from our fallible leaders and the leadership is back to God's chosen.

Well you are probably doing a grand job of persuading people of Islam's good intentions - is your Taliban membership form in the post?

And many or even most countries make and betray allies as suits themselves, so no point in trying to give any the greater benefit as to moral superiority. Russia is no different than most others in this regard - for example, WWII.

 

[stevecanuck]

I understand you said enemies of enemy become allies. My question is why have they singled out US as the enemy to ally with other nations and not other disbelieving nations?

You saying we aren't necessarily friends. Okay. But why is US singled out?

Did you forget Israel?

As for the U.S., why would you NOT pick out the leader of the infidel world to make an enemy?

And why does anyone have to be the enemy? Because your 'religion' says so, that's why.

 

[Link]

Did you forget Israel?

As for the U.S., why would you NOT pick out the leader of the infidel world to make an enemy?

And why does anyone have to be the enemy? Because your 'religion' says so, that's why.

So why does not Russia see US as a leader of them?