I think the difference between disciples of Jesus and socialists is this:
Disciples of Jesus want to help others freely, because they think it is good. And they don't want to be burden to others.
If that would actually work, I'd be all for it, but history has shown us that it clearly doesn't.
For just one example, charities during rough times tend to dry up as people who normally would donate are often fearful of losing their jobs. Deaths from starvation in Appalachia and the Navaho Res. occurred in the late 1950's, so if charity supposedly worked, why did these children die?
Socialists think other people must help them, give them everything, while they are not ready to do anything for others, nor to themselves.
Using a stereotype like this is unconscionable, and you should be ashamed of stooping to such a low. And as I posted last, you are clearing dissing what Jesus taught and elevating $ to deity levels.
Both may have the idea of helping others, the former just think others should be for them, while disciples of Jesus think they should take care of themselves and then be able to help also others.
That is so utterly pathetic as you again resort to using a stereotype.
No, a disciple of Christ puts
God and
people first, not
$.