Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
Or all three could repent and cease to be hypocrites.*edit*
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Or all three could repent and cease to be hypocrites.*edit*
Just the Jews and Christians doing so would be sufficient.Or all three could repent and cease to be hypocrites.
Wow, that's seriously bigoted.Just the Jews and Christians doing so would be sufficient.
If and when some finally do, the Muslims will do much to help fallow the fields of all the weeds so that a new worthwhile crop can be cultivated.
God has a very useful and beneficial purpose in Islam being just the way they are, for the time being.
*edit*
Some delicious irony this is!Christians (and Jews) have all the best weapons.
Viva la revolucion, eh?Just the Jews and Christians doing so would be sufficient.
If and when some finally do, the Muslims will do much to help fallow the fields of all the weeds so that a new worthwhile crop can be cultivated.
God has a very useful and beneficial purpose in Islam being just the way they are, for the time being.
If we didn't we would not be here. There is a famous saying that goes something like this: If the Muslim's put down their arms there would be peace tomorrow. If the Israelis put down their arms there would be no Israel tomorrow. There is a world of wisdom in those statements.
Both groups.historically have been known for warring practices in the name of religion. Alot of lives.have been lost in the wake of the Christian sword. Fortunately for us in America we are allegedly civilized enough to not bring those things to fruition, but what about before America, the crusades, the inquisBoth groups.historically have been known for warring practices in the name of religion. Alot of lives.have been lost in the wake of the Christian sword. Fortunately for us in America we are allegedly civilized enough to not bring those things to fruition, but what about before America, the crusades, the inquisitions.
The Muslims and their advent upon Jerusalem and their obvious hatred towards the Jews, these are the ingredients needed for slaughter. And not yet have we considered the advent of violence towards pagans and unbelievers of those religions. America will have this blood shed on it's steps before the middle of this century.
We cannot assume that a group that is as aggressive as the people of the Muslim faith.are going to sit idly by while the rest of us make different choices other than the ones that are appeasing to their religion. Unfortunately, both sects don't allow this to transpire without the bringing of violence.
I invite any person of Muslim faith to prove differently.
Any religion that promises peace but brings a string of violence in order to make it absolute, is one that is hellbent on control, I have worked with and know alot of Muslims and they all seem to think that America is no good, they have no respect for anything American, for they are now just biding their time. Could.you imagine a state where a woman dress is dictated by religious authority, in America. They are not interested in freedom to them it is only a matter time before they draw the sword of violence and religious hatred...
Unfortunately, it seems inevitable to me.Viva la revolucion, eh?
Thanks for your thoughts.Wow, that's seriously bigoted.
I think you should rethink your use of "Love and Truth" as a religious label.
Very kind of you to stand idly by and contribute a dash or two of mockery.Y'all peas in a pod, having a ******* contest into the wind.
Calling them weeds that need to be cleared for your garden is bigoted. Telling them you know "their" God better than they do is bigoted. Rewriting their divine covenants to suit your purposes is bigoted.Thanks for your thoughts.
Asking Jews and Christians to have fidelity to their God wouldn't be in accordance with "Love and Truth"?
Pointing out that some extremely unsavory consequences are headed their way if they don't is a bigoted thing to do?
Has it occurred to you that both of these groups of people have made covenants that have terms and conditions to them?
If the contract says:
If you do A then B will happen.
And, if B is something that is really unpleasant, am I out of line to suggest they stop doing A or B is going to happen?
Jews and Christians have made covenants with a God who speaks of them in terms of wheat and tares. That's His garden, not mine.Calling them weeds that need to be cleared for your garden is bigoted.
That is "our" God. And, I have the right to call my brothers and sisters of the covenant to repentance. We are eachother's keeper. Calling my brothers to repentance is LOVING.Telling them you know "their" God better than they do is bigoted.
Your argument here is vile.Rewriting their divine covenants to suit your purposes is bigoted.
I didn't make that up. It's in the covenant. If you become salt that loses its savor you are good for nothing but to be trodden under foot.Not to mention the whole implication of genocide if they don't "see the light."
More baseless slur. It's terms and conditions of the covenant.Furthermore, B is your own sick threat.
So I should just say "Eat, drink and be merry!".None of that is compatible with love or truth.
I don't care whether you base your insults on Scriptural metaphors or South Park. You are responsible for your statements.Jews and Christians have made covenants with a God who speaks of them in terms of wheat and tares. That's His garden, not mine.
No.If you don't like that, then perhaps you should advocate they not enter into such covenants instead of lashing out at me when I speak of them. Fair enough?
I think the word you're looking for is "hypocritical." We both know you wouldn't want that kind of "love" directed at you and yours.That is "our" God. And, I have the right to call my brothers and sisters of the covenant to repentance. We are eachother's keeper. Calling my brothers to repentance is LOVING.
The fact that you pretend to be an authority on their covenants, and further that you think said covenants entail conversion to yours. Vile indeed.Your argument here is vile.
What proof do you have to back up this disgusting slur?
You're calling for conversion by the sword.I didn't make that up. It's in the covenant. If you become salt that loses its savor you are good for nothing but to be trodden under foot.
I am calling for sobriety and repentance so that the consequences clearly stated can be averted.
More lame attempts to dodge. Your ignorance is painfully obvious.More baseless slur. It's terms and conditions of the covenant.
You owe me a new irony meter.Your ignorance and hubris is among the most repulsive I have yet encountered here.
I don't read mindless regurgitation, especially when it's a blatant attempt to intimidate me with a wall of text.Before you come back at me with more of your bleeding heart nonsense. Here's some of the fine print for you to ponder on.
And I should be held responsible for them in the intent for which they were given.I don't care whether you base your insults on Scriptural metaphors or South Park. You are responsible for your statements.
Cry me a river then.
Don't speak for me. You don't know me, and it seems likely you never can or shall.I think the word you're looking for is "hypocritical." We both know you wouldn't want that kind of "love" directed at you and yours.
Terror is hanging over the people of the State of Israel and the USA and elsewhere because they are infidels to their covenants. Can't you see that the purpose of Islam is to carry out the punitive measures of the covenant if violated?The fact that you pretend to be an authority on their covenants, and further that you think said covenants entail conversion to yours. Vile indeed.
No! I'm calling for those who are in a covenant with God to wake up and realize the source of the terror hanging over them is rooted in the fine print of their own covenant.You're calling for conversion by the sword.
This statement right his is a lame attempt to dodge and evidence of your own ignorance.More lame attempts to dodge. Your ignorance is painfully obvious.
Guess what? Jews and Christians are not defined by Islamic theology. You can fanwank all you want, none of your interpretations carry any authority outside your bubble.
It was worthless to start with.You owe me a new irony meter.
Especially if it exposes you for the ignorant and presumptuous numbskull you are being here in this thread.I don't read mindless regurgitation, especially when it's a blatant attempt to intimidate me with a wall of text.
All your nice flowery talk about the cosmos is rather irrelevant.Again, people speak on God's behalf and yet God never speaks for itself. It's almost like it has nothing to say at the present moment. It is content basking within itself and emanating existence. It has no frame of reference for human affairs. Evil is a human matter. God is too busy simply being in a state of equanimity and peace. Perhaps instead of speaking for God we should try to immitate that state of contentment and tranquility even within the most divisive and conflictive periods of life.
Can anyone demonstrate that God does not exist in this form? If it is just as likely as any other presentation of God, then I have no reason to alter my view.
All your nice flowery talk about the cosmos is rather irrelevant.
The God with whom Jews and Christians have covenanted has not hidden the terms of that covenant.
It is not rocket science either. If they despise and turn away from that which they have covenanted to uphold, terror shall hang over them and if they do not repent and mend their ways, all that God said would happen begins to happen.
If you are not a Jew or Christian, the last thing you should be trying to do is influence them to favor alternative things that would have them violating their covenants. Israel in the flesh (the Jews) and Israel in the spirit (Christianity) are like a bride to their husband. They are in a covenant marriage with him. If you try and pick the locks of Jehovah's bride and get her to join in some hanky-panky infidelity with you, then you are bringing upon yourselves the sin of adultery. And, the last time I checked, that one was a fatal deal for both the bride and the lock picker.
Now, so that people don't get wild ideas about me. I'M JUST SAYING.
When you have finished reading the first 5 books of Moses, which are Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy, then you will have listened to what the God of Moses had to say that established the Mosaic Covenant for Israel. Reading the Qur'aan would also be a really good idea too.Yes, you are just saying. Again, all I read are the words of man. I have not heard God speak nor write anything. It's always the word of man. There is no logical reason why God wouldn't speak to the common man in the same manner it would speak to supposed prophets. I can only conclude that God is silent and represents something beyond mere words uttered by man. Perhaps we speak too much and listen too little?
When you have finished reading the first 5 books of Moses, which are Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy, then you will have listened to what the God of Moses had to say that established the Mosaic Covenant for Israel. Reading the Qur'aan would also be a really good idea too.
This is where you will find all of the answers to what is going on today between Jews, Christians and Islam.
In case you haven't figured it out yet, the domain in which God lives is as Spirit within the collective minds of men. How else can such a God speak except through men? And, not just any man, but those men who God anoints to have authority to speak words that are binding.