Ok but denial also includes the possibility of calling the accuser "conspiracy theorist" which has been invented to belittle the interlocutor, whenever someone doesn't know how to refute an argument.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Russia....What It's Like
- Thread starter Revoltingest
- Start date
Far more often, the term "conspiracy theorist"
applies to people who believe loopy conspiracies,
eg, faked Moon landings, George Soros running
governments, USA's plans to conquer Russia to
take its assets.
Conspiracies are not made true
by your hypothetical construct.
...and the American Deep State blowing up the Norstream2 as well, right?
It's useful to make a distinction between a covert
military act with the large scale conspiracies
under discussion. The former doesn't make
the latter real.
So you are saying that the US did blow up the pipeline as "covert military act"?
It's already difficult try to decipher someone who speaks a different language than mine.
Did they? It's either yes or no.
I didn't state who wrecked the pipeline.
Why? Because I don't know.
This is just a matter of a skewed perception on your part. If the fundamental concept you're addressing has to do with uncritically accepting a non-falsifiable claim without evidence, then this is a universal phenomenon which can be found in everyone, including yourself. The only difference that I can discern is that, if it's critical of the US government, then it's a "wild conspiracy theory," but if it's something the government claims, even if it's equally wild and unevidenced, it doesn't get treated that way.
Do you really believe that this kind of blatant gaslighting goes unnoticed?
Honestly, if it's really that important to you to persuade people to not believe in conspiracy theories, then maybe you can explain the difference. Explain why your claims about Putin wanting to conquer the world are valid, while my claims that the government spends taxpayer dollars on military (the essence of your "MIC" conspiracy theory) are invalid.
Ok,...apparently it was Ukrainians...or at least that's what they say.
if the Kiev government thinks that Germans will continue to support them with the warfare supply after what they have done,, I guess they are highly delusional.
To not appreciate that there are fundamentally
different ways that people's brains work bespeaks
not being not observant of people. Or perhaps
you're trying to justify cromulence of your own
conspiracy theories?
Perhaps they falsely claim it for political purposes.
We don't know.
I think they understand their situation better than you do.
Actually, I'm very observant of people. You think that I can't see, that I don't notice?
To be observant without noticing something so significant?
Bjerdle!
Yeah...I went there.
Last edited:
And you don't notice the similarities?
I observe that humans have many similarities.
As do I.
Germans are wild over the Nordstream.
Their emotional reaction proves nothing about who did what.
