If a person A threatens to kill another person B with a knife and the next day the person B is found dead with a stab in the back....what should I think?Their emotional reaction proves nothing about who did what.
That A is innocent?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If a person A threatens to kill another person B with a knife and the next day the person B is found dead with a stab in the back....what should I think?Their emotional reaction proves nothing about who did what.
Why?You should watch European media more
Validity is measured by plausibility and evidence....and the American Deep State blowing up the Norstream2 as well, right?
If a person A threatens to kill another person B with a knife and the next day the person B is found dead with a stab in the back....what should I think?Validity is measured by plausibility and evidence.
It seems that you've a point to make,If a person A threatens to kill another person B with a knife and the next day the person B is found dead with a stab in the back....what should I think?
That A is innocent?
But Jack The Ripper was clearly not Chinese.In the US he would be free to go.
No wonder OJ Simpson was acquitted.
The NSA, and then the U.S. Justice Department did that convincing, not so much the Russians.They got Snowden to swear fealty to Russia.
Anybody who thinks that established governments primarily serve their citizenry is deluded. Governments, as all human bureaucratic organizations, eventually take on a life of their own, separate from “the people”, and end up serving themselves first and foremost, especially the imperatives to perpetuate and to increase power. This is Organizational Behavior 101. A given government will serve a citizen when he facilitates the fulfillment of those imperatives, and destroy a citizen when he impedes it. Snowden ran into the arms of Russia because he knew that he was about to be destroyed by his government otherwise.Well...when your own country doesn't defend you, ....I guess it's normal one finds comfort in the arms of another country.
Tsk, tsk. Unlike here in the Anglosphere, where people have it good and are deathly afraid of rocking the boat too much, the citizenries of many countries (and this is especially true of countries in the Mediterranean Basin) tend to “go to the political poles”, fostering robust communist, anarchist, and nationalist parties. This is foreign in many ways to us here in America, where a third party couldn’t get off the ground if it was placed into a trebuchet. I think that the opinions of Italians mentioned by @Estro Felino probably reflects that political milieu.Why do so many Italians have such horrible taste and judgement?
Haha…Proto-Amish, perhaps?pre-Amish
You confirmed my point. All people who were eliminated by the American Deep State.
Because MLK, JFK and RFK were all eliminated by the same criminal minds.
JFK sought a dialogue with Russia.
“With…without…and, who’ll deny that’s what the fighting’s all about?”Capitalists are too stubborn and greedy, which is the core reason for most human conflict and dissension in the world today.
I wonder how he views Russian surveillance of its citizens? Now that he is one.The NSA, and then the U.S. Justice Department did that convincing, not so much the Russians.
Really? How sad. The Italians, who taught the French how to cook, who taught the world about art, inventiveness, gave us Dante...and they adore Russia and Putin? Ignorance, stangnancy and submission?I can speak for my own country and my own people.
The 50% of them adores Russia because they still dream of the USSR...
the other 50% adores Russians because they elected Putin.
I find it strangely ironic that the government of our country could attack Mexico, fabricate a war with Spain, and ethnically cleanse vast swathes of land of “Native American” cultures, all in the service of its “manifest destiny”, and now, despite not having made reparation for those actions, thinks that it has moral standing to censure Russia for pursuing its own concept of manifest destiny. Just sayin’.I'm well aware the U.S. has a slimy underbelly that I wouldn't try to excuse or justify.
Probably poorly, but I’m sure he’s had his fill of cloak-and-dagger for a lifetime.I wonder how he views Russian surveillance of its citizens? Now that he is one.
Exactly! Given how much taste, judgement, talent and acumen they once had. I can only suppose the supremacy of the Papal States, guided by religion, helped pave the way to intellectual torpor.Both the USSR and Putin turned out to be trash.
Why do so many Italians have such horrible taste and judgement?
This is why I prefer a more limited & democratic government.Anybody who thinks that established governments primarily serve their citizenry is deluded. Governments, as all human bureaucratic organizations, eventually take on a life of their own, separate from “the people”, and end up serving themselves first and foremost, especially the imperatives to perpetuate and to increase power. A given government will serve a citizen when he facilitates the fulfillment of those imperatives, and destroy a citizen when he impedes it.
But isn't that what the framers were aiming for? That government should be limited -- and have to go back to the "masses" on a regular basis to ask for permission to carry on?This is why I prefer a more limited & democratic government.
Harder for it to oppress the masses.