-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Saving Yourself for Marriage?
- Thread starter Sunstone
- Start date
My bad, I didnt mean all men
Meh...I know. Trust me, I know.
I'm just picky with that stuff. Everytime Sterling Archer posts something about atheists, I feel compelled to follow him and post clarifications too.
I wouldn't for a second say your sentiment was wrong, mind you. Only the wording.
If a man's turn-on is "deflowering" a woman and the woman's expecting a lifelong monogamous commitment from the man, then either he or she going to end up disappointed in the long run.
C'mon now...that never happens...:sarcastic
dgirl1986
Big Queer Chesticles!
Happens more often that you'd think (not you specifically).
Draka
Wonder Woman
Having had sex both within and outside of marriages, both with husbands prior to marrying them and during marriage, and with those I was not married to, I think I can sufficiently say...getting married didn't change the sex. In fact, I've had sexual relations outside of my marriages that have been much more loving and true relationships than my marriages were.
Marriage doesn't make the relationship, the people involved do. And if the people involved happen to not be married...then no piece of paper is going to change what they already have.
Marriage doesn't make the relationship, the people involved do. And if the people involved happen to not be married...then no piece of paper is going to change what they already have.
Caladan
Agnostic Pantheist
Exactly, we are sexual creatures. In any other aspect: economic or social we are expected to bring our 'credentials' when committing ourselves to marriage, It's absurd to neglect the physical part which is one of the base pillars of a healthy marriage.
I'm not sure you got my point. What I was getting at is that once a woman has sex, she can't be "deflowered" again. This means that one of two things will happen:
- the man doesn't stray beyond his monogamous relationship. He will never again indulge this desire of his... which would be pretty disappointing to the man.
- the man will indulge the desire... but since he can't do it again within the bounds of his monogamous relationship, he'd have to do it with someone else... which would be pretty disappointing to the woman.
Nope. I totally got your point. I agree with it, too.
Was just posting my little sarcastic one liner whilst chuckling to myself. In my head (and watch-out, because I have been told it works in an unusual fashion) I saw a honeymoon couple.
'Wow, honey...that was awesome. Totally worth getting married for. That thing you did with the chihuahua was inspired!'
'Oh, thanks babe. Yeah, I thought it was great too. Same time tomorrow night?'
'Sure...I'll bring the champagne, you bring the hymen.'
'Oh...well...I mean...it's broken now...so...I...ummm....'
'What? You were pure when I married you. I don't know who you've become. You've changed!'
Ahem...
I did warn ya.
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
Considering who I am. It makes little difference to worry about the purity of something I do not want
I shall leave that up to the sexual individuals
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
And what is wrong about my opinions on atheists :sarcastic
dgirl1986
Big Queer Chesticles!
From what I have seen they dont see it as something they necessarily pursue or constantly pursue with different women. It is kinda like a threesome I guess, when they do have the opportunity their mind goes OH HELL YEAH MAN.
Sometimes its just a case of they get what they want and they move on rather than being in a "committed relationship" of any sort if that makes sense.
That you have a tendency to ascribe particular traits to atheists, that you sometimes post as if atheism is some sort of philosophy, and that sometimes I suspect you only recognise strong atheism as atheism.
Haven't you noticed me haunting your threads, just itching to catch you out...?
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
That you have a tendency to ascribe particular traits to atheists, that you sometimes post as if atheism is some sort of philosophy, and that sometimes I suspect you only recognise strong atheism as atheism.
Haven't you noticed me haunting your threads, just itching to catch you out...?
You are aware almost all of my issues with atheism is against strong atheism right? You and a handful are about the only "moderate" atheists I come across on multiple forums. I have had atheists on this forum tell me they can disprove the existence of god flat out until they figured out I am a Deists. I have a whole thread which consists of atheists trolling non stop as well. To be fair, I have never found placing differences between the levels of atheism as useful considering I can only make 2 out of 50 talk rationally.
Also recently I have written a serious questions and refutations you atheists cannot deny
Last edited:
I.S.L.A.M617
Illuminatus
This seems like the most logical view to me. If you've never cooked before, you wouldn't try cooking dinner for the first time ever to make someone happy. Well, you might, but you would fail miserably and waste perfectly good food.
Yup. I know your opinion on that. But I'm pretty sure that being the case you can expect the 2 out of 50 to complain about being misrepresented. Think of me as a one percenter.
Also recently I have written a serious questions and refutations you atheists cannot deny
You're right. I cannot deny that you've written a serious question. You also written some...less serious questions. I'm not casting stones, I do the same. The fact you have a sense of humour is what led me to using your name when making a joke.
As for not refuting what you wrote, 2 quick points;
1) Not sure which point I didn't refute.
2) Are you sure I could understand what the heck you were talking about??
dust1n
Zindīq
Nor do I. I'm having a hard time making sense of using one's virginity for the attraction of females, when it seems said attraction can't really be used for the purposes of which people attract mates in the first place.
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
I have always rationalized that sexual people liked virgins since it was like the equivalent of purchasing a new car instead of a used one.
Not sure if this is applicable in modern day society because used or not I sure ain't touching it
I know, but think about it - wouldn't you feel a little bit, even the slightest bit better if you had a virgin wife? Just the fact she chose you to be the first one to pop her cherry means something, at least to me. She might have been with other guys, but she refused to have sex with them. But now she is letting you have sex with her, that means she shows more affection for you than other guys.
Like I said, if you have sex before marriage, I personally don't see a problem with it, but it is more romantic when marriage before sex.
I have always rationalized that sexual people liked virgins since it was like the equivalent of purchasing a new car instead of a used one.
Not sure if this is applicable in modern day society because used or not I sure ain't touching it
To continue with your analogy, are you choosing a brand new Corolla, or a Ferrari with only 150 kms on the clock and a small stone chip?