Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
Make 'em a baloney sandwich.
Problem solved.
Problem solved.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If you tolerate lactose you are an oddball? Most people aren't lactose intolerant. Besides, dairy is one of the best, if not the absolute best, sources of calcium we have. Something we need in our diets. Why shouldn't we eat dairy?
Make 'em a baloney sandwich.
Problem solved.
se Intolerance
In order to understand the physiology behind primary LI,
we must examine what happens to lactase activity as childhood
proceeds. We mentioned before that lactase levels remain high
during infancy. However, what happens after infancy is determined by one’s genetic makeup. If one possesses the more
common autosomal recessive gene, lactase activity begins to
drop between the ages of 2 and 20 years(3,4). On the other
hand (or chromosome), if one possesses the less common autosomal dominant gene, lactase activity remains high into adulthood.
What does this mean to those of us sitting in this room?
How many of you can drink milk right now and be free of any
problems? Raise your hands. Do those of you with your hands
raised realize that you are mutants? When I told my sons they
were mutants, they had visions of Ninja Turtles and X-Men,
but I had to clarify that they don’t get to live in the sewers or
chase bad guys. Why are you mutants?
No mammal other than man has the ability to ingest milk
as an adult. Even then, only a small percentage of the world’s
humans are actually lactase persistent, as those of you who
raised your hands are known. As many as 75 percent of humans are not able to drink milk as adults without experiencing embarrassing and painful symptoms. Why did some population groups develop the mutation that allowed them to drink
milk as adults? For one possible answer, we turn to simple
Darwinian evolutionary theory.
http://archive.ajpe.org/legacy/pdfs/aj640216.pdf
So depending on the source its anywhere between 75% and 90% of humans are "lactose intolerant"..which makes you the odd ball if you can drink it with absolutely ZERO issues with it...
Also though cheese and yogurt are more tolerable because they are fermented.So some may be able to tolerate those ..while they can not tolerate drinking milk.
Top it off with egg-free mayo and dairy-free cheese (made from cashews of course, not soy).
Nitrate-free bologna on gluten-free bread. Top it off with egg-free mayo and dairy-free cheese (made from cashews of course, not soy).
C'mon, KT. Don't you keep current with what responsible parents do nowadays?
LOL!!! Eggs are good for you stop picking on EGGS! In fact eggs are one of the only decent sources of vitamin D!
Sure, I'm generally aware of most of the ridiculous fads that all the nutty, trend-following sheep jump to from year-to-year, in the endless pursuit of trying to mitigate fractional risks while engaging in the shallow and meaningless exercise of displaying to their neighbors and friends that they really, really are good parents and good people, who will eventually wipe away all the terrible slights and hurts they received at the hands of their own barbaric and ignorant parents, by glomming onto any and every sad little scrap of socially mandated behavior, no matter how baseless or meaningless, which identifies them as "responsbile" parents and human beings.
Why do you ask?
C'mon, KT. Don't you keep current with what responsible parents do nowadays?
But our eggs that we eat as a family? Locally pastured. They're gorgeous and the yolk is so golden and firm. We eat them every day.
Its not the parents fault in these cases anyway.They manufacture this "food" and its 90% whats in he damn grocery store.They wont help you figure out whats in it or what it does (can do) to your body longer term...I never even heard of 'nitrates" let alone knew that they weren't exactly good for you including the risk of stomach cancer until I was in my 30's.That would have been ...um ..after serving my kids probably 1,000 hot dogs (all tallied up over the years) and cured deli meats ...they didn't like bologna..one of my personal favorites...(with mustard and tomatoes on white wonder wonder bread)
But peanut products are another story. The risks are far greater to consider than mere inconvenience and incredulity.
I don't know the exact risk of allowing peanut products in schools. However, it is the type of black and white risk that tends to result in either nothing happening, or with a kid suffocating after their throat swells closed. At the end of the day, even with a small probability of risk, I don't know if a peanut butter sandwich is worth it. There are plenty of other lunch options which carry no risk of accidentally killing a fellow student.
Like bologna and cheese.
Sure, I'm generally aware of most of the ridiculous fads that all the nutty, trend-following sheep jump to from year-to-year, in the endless pursuit of trying to mitigate fractional risks while engaging in the shallow and meaningless exercise of displaying to their neighbors and friends that they really, really are good parents and good people, who will eventually wipe away all the terrible slights and hurts they received at the hands of their own barbaric and ignorant parents, by glomming onto any and every sad little scrap of socially mandated behavior, no matter how baseless or meaningless, which identifies them as "responsbile" parents and human beings.
Why do you ask?
I think that's a little harsh.Calling nutritional concerns a "trend".