• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Schwarzenegger Vows Gay Marriage Bill Veto

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ardent Listener

Active Member
Theodore said:
What a drama queen you are Flappy. Sit down and have a beer.

Don’t hold your breath.

You guys love to brand anybody who disagrees with your lifestyle as a hateful, homophobic bigot. That way you can demonize anybody who gets in the way of your agenda.

If you were so confident with the way you lived your lives, all that would be unnecessary. But you’re not so you accuse others of being hateful and worse.

I don’t hate any of you, but I’m starting to feel sorry for you. You’re all so scared and angry. Is that what it means to be gay?
May I exude only sweetness

Teach me to be like the ripe orange which, though crused and bitten, fails not to impart its innate sweetnes.

Battered by unkindness, lashed by crule criticism, or wounded by misunderstanding, may I unceasingly exude only the fragrance of love.

Like soap flakes which, when beaten, give out cleansing suds, may I, hard-pounded by ingratitude, offer to all the purifying foam of my deepest wisdom.

From Wispers From Eternity by Paramahansa Yogananda Founder and guru of SRF (Self Realization Fellowship.

May we both remember these wise words dear one.
Ardent Listener:162:
 

The Black Whirlwind

Well-Known Member
i am expressing my opinion on the useless ritual of marriage, not dragging your kind through the mud. take my opinion or leave it, because it isn't going to change.
 

Jaymes

The cake is a lie
I'd rather go through a 'useless' ritual and regret it than not go through it and be blocked from seeing Liz or being unable to make decisions for her if she was ever unable to.
 

Flappycat

Well-Known Member
TheJedi said:
i am expressing my opinion on the useless ritual of marriage, not dragging your kind through the mud. take my opinion or leave it, because it isn't going to change.
Ballyhoo on your opinion of marriage! You made a post to condemn us for equating the struggle for gay rights with the trials faced by racial minorities and quite clearly and unmistakably claimed that homosexuals are treated "exactly the same" except in regard to marriage rights. I very clearly and unmistakably commented on these in my last post. For one thing, homosexuals have been every bit as much a victim of bigotry and prejudice as racial minorities, often to the extent of being treated as criminals, and, in present times, a person is one hundred percent more likely to be murdered over sexual orientation than for skin color. If the bigots had perfectly reliable gaydar, they'd be arresting us for "looking suspicious" left and right.

I actually went out of my way to avoid commenting on your opinion of the institution of marriage. To some, it's quite a big deal. Can't respect that? Watch me not care.
 

The Black Whirlwind

Well-Known Member
i commented in an earlier post that gays are not discriminated against at all where i live, they are not only tolerated, but accepted by the community. thats where i get my opinion that gays are treated the same way as straights. if thats not the way outside my hippie bubble, than i am sorry for my ignorance. and no, i did not say gay rights were trivial compared to the trials of black people, but that gay marriage was. there is a difference. I think marriage is a useless and tiresome ritual that usualy causes more pain than joy. Can't respect that? watch me not care.
 

Theodore

Member
Flappycat said:
Have you ever felt a deep and passionate love for someone, Theodore? Have you ever wanted to swear in the eyes of God that you will love and cherish that person forever? I've felt it, and it hurts me that you don't feel I should have that right. It wounds me.
Oh please, don’t give me this crap. What do you care what I think about your relationship? You can go and have any relationship you please, I never said you couldn’t. Just because the state doesn’t officially recognize your relationship doesn’t mean anybody is preventing you from having that relationship. Don’t be such a pathetic victim.



Please, just tell me that you don't mean it when you say that you find the relationship I have with the person I love most in the world "repugnant". I'll leave you alone if you just take that back, and I won't ask for anything else.
I find the idea of two men having sex with each other repellant and repugnant. I do not find love between any two people objectionable. However, I see a clear distinction between sex and love.

I bear no malice toward you or anyone else. I feel it’s my duty as a father and a citizen to help maintain a moral conscience within society. Part of that morality is to ensure the physical security of all people. Another part of that morality is to make sure we don’t descend towards Sodom and Gomorra. I have seen enough of the gay bathhouse scene to realize that it’s not far off.
 
M

Majikthise

Guest
I believe inter- racial couples once had to deal with all this crap. People of different races marry all the time now, and the world isn't coming to an end.
 

Flappycat

Well-Known Member
Theodore said:
Oh please, don’t give me this crap. What do you care what I think about your relationship? You can go and have any relationship you please, I never said you couldn’t. Just because the state doesn’t officially recognize your relationship doesn’t mean anybody is preventing you from having that relationship.
I have a right to be treated equally under the law, and you are wrong to participate in any enactment of law that denies me that right.

Don’t be such a pathetic victim.
How many schoolyard thugs have said the same thing?

I find the idea of two men having sex with each other repellant and repugnant.
If you have ever received oral stimulation from your wife, then I have never been involved in a sexual act that she has not been guilty of. Do you find your wife repugnant? I have similar feelings about the notion of having intercourse with a woman to your feelings about having intercourse with a man. The notion leaves me feeling...dirty. However, nobody has asked you to have sex with a man. Nobody has even asked you to witness two men having intercourse. What, then, is the problem? Is the fact that two men, somewhere, are having sexual intercourse with one another offensive to you? This is called homophobia. This is the appropriate term to discribe a person who finds the notion of homosex frightening, offensive, or distubing and not an effort to demonize you, as you seem fond of accusing me of. If you wish to cure yourself of your homophobia, I suggest that you take a few extra moments out of every day to seriously contemplate the possibility that you yourself may be homosexual until you no longer experience any worse emotion than amusement in doing so. This is intended to reassure you that you are absolutely incapable of finding yourself seriously attracted to the same sex, and this knowledge may help you to reduce your feelings of uneasiness over the idea of two men being together. No matter how confident you think you are in your sexual orientation, knowing for certain that your sexual preference really is inherent really does help a great deal.

I do not find love between any two people objectionable. However, I see a clear distinction between sex and love.
How about the idea of two men walking shoulder to shoulder, hugging, or kissing in the easy and natural way that you often see between heterosexual couples?

I bear no malice toward you or anyone else.
Referring to me as a "pathetic victim" had no malice in it, then?

I feel it’s my duty as a father and a citizen to help maintain a moral conscience within society.
As a citizen, I am obligated to uphold and defend the ideas of freedom and equality, and I also uphold Madison's idea that minorities should have a way to protect themselves from the majority, particularly in defense of themselves. In interest of this, I ask you to set aside your absolutist doctrine long enough to attempt to have compassion for the lot of other people.

Part of that morality is to ensure the physical security of all people.
Do you really feel that homosexuality makes you or anyone else insecure, or does it merely make you and a few others feel insecure with yourselves? It's a serious question.

Another part of that morality is to make sure we don’t descend towards Sodom and Gomorra.
Have you ever even opened the Bible? Apparently, you have never taken the time and energy to read it comprehensively. That would have no effect on my status as a person, but you, on the other hand, should spend more time attempting to educate yourself about your own religion. The reasons for Sodom's destruction are expressed clearly and unmistakably in Ezekiel, and none of them refer to homosexuality to my memory.

I have seen enough of the gay bathhouse scene to realize that it’s not far off.
You're in California. I wouldn't venture there without the protection of a rubber suit and a flamethrower. In all seriousness, your thinking here is really quite backwards. Any homosexuals who chose to get married would most likely not follow the beliefs or philosophies of those on the gay bathhouse scene, and I can't help but join you in finding this irresponsible attitude toward sexuality quite repellent. Much of it is due to the moral abandoment that homosexual children are subject to when their parents realize that their child is homosexual. If your child does turn out to be homosexual, the worst possible response is to disown him or to declare yourself a failure as a parent. If you can't get your child to change his or her sexual orientation, then you should do the same things that you would do for a heterosexual child, including inviting zir to develop a lasting relationship with someone and inviting zir partners to become members of your family. Many parents become so uncomfortable with the idea of their child having a sexual orientation that they find, at best, unsettling that they forget about their many responsibilities as parents, including defending their children from lovers who are only out to take advantage of them and asking their children to save themselves for someone whom they might be willing to spend the rest of their lives with.

Try to understand, though, that many homosexual couples are mature and responsible people, and many are raising children together who seem to be just as happy and stable as those raised by heterosexual parents. Something has got to be done about the unfortunate attitude that many homosexuals take toward sex, but barring them from marriage is uncontrovertibly the worst possible thing to do about it.
 

Flappycat

Well-Known Member
TheJedi said:
i commented in an earlier post that gays are not discriminated against at all where i live, they are not only tolerated, but accepted by the community. thats where i get my opinion that gays are treated the same way as straights. if thats not the way outside my hippie bubble, than i am sorry for my ignorance.
Sheltered! California, here I come!

and no, i did not say gay rights were trivial compared to the trials of black people, but that gay marriage was. there is a difference.
Yeah, and it sure was petty of those black activists to kick up such a fuss over seating arrangements on a bus and other such trivial things. I guess it was also pathetic of the Women's Suffragists to make up such a fuss over voting when they were perfectly capable of making suggestions to their husbands. Don't they know what a real civil rights issue is? Don't they have any notion of what's worth fighting for and what isn't? It's so pitiful that people feel they have to make up such a controversy over such insignificant little slights.

I think marriage is a useless and tiresome ritual that usualy causes more pain than joy. Can't respect that? watch me not care.
I never said that I didn't. In fact, I've made quite a point of saying, from the very beginning, that I honestly don't care.
 

Mike182

Flaming Queer
Flappycat said:
Any homosexuals who chose to get married would most likely not follow the beliefs or philosophies of those on the gay bathhouse scene, and I can't help but join you in finding this irresponsible attitude toward sexuality quite repellent.[/QUOTE
this is the simplest reason for why i do not indulge in the 'gay scene' - because its just a lot of people swapping and exchanging partners nearly once a week, or more frequently

ok, that could be a little over the top, but this behaviour disgusts me

i think you are stereotyping all gay men to be almost an exact replica of "will and grace" - i can tell you now, were not all that funny, were not all that camp, and we're not all prepared to sleep with the weird russian guy down the road selling papers and who doesn't speak a word of english! (and sleep with him in the doorway of conservatives HQ :biglaugh: )

Much of it is due to the moral abandoment that homosexual children are subject to when their parents realize that their child is homosexual. If your child does turn out to be homosexual, the worst possible response is to disown him or to declare yourself a failure as a parent. If you can't get your child to change his or her sexual orientation, then you should do the same things that you would do for a heterosexual child, including inviting zir to develop a lasting relationship with someone and inviting zir partners to become members of your family. Many parents become so uncomfortable with the idea of their child having a sexual orientation that they find, at best, unsettling that they forget about their many responsibilities as parents, including defending their children from lovers who are only out to take advantage of them and asking their children to save themselves for someone whom they might be willing to spend the rest of their lives with.
my mum has tried really hard to accept me, and she did protect me from an abusive relationship i got into - long story, bu the had been lying to me about his age - a lot!

Try to understand, though, that many homosexual couples are mature and responsible people, and many are raising children together who seem to be just as happy and stable as those raised by heterosexual parents. Something has got to be done about the unfortunate attitude that many homosexuals take toward sex, but barring them from marriage is uncontrovertibly the worst possible thing to do about it.
if the people with this kind of attitude towards sex were allowed marriage, either we would have quite a high gay-marriage divorce rate, or they would simply not wish to get married because they do not want to give up their current lifestyle




that was a good post flappycat, im really behind you 110%

C_P
 

Quoth The Raven

Half Arsed Muse
Theodore said:
[/color]
Gay marriage is not a right, so you aren’t being denied any “rights”. And I certainly do have the right to voice my opinion along with the majority to form public policy.
When you live in a country with compulsory voting, where if you don't turn out to the polling booth you are fined (as we are here) then you can claim that you are indeed amongst an actual majority (if in fact you are). In your case, your opinion is only shared by the majority of the people who could be bothered turning out on polling day.

Michel said:
I think that is one of the most horrendously premeditated insults I have heard; this thread has been going long enough for Theodore to understand the import of what he just said.:mad:
I think you'll find he doesn't give a toss.
 

Quoth The Raven

Half Arsed Muse
Theodore said:
If you were so confident with the way you lived your lives, all that would be unnecessary. But you’re not so you accuse others of being hateful and worse.
If you and the others like you were so confident that heterosexual marriage is sanctified by God then you could just turn around and say,'let the queers do what they like, it's their toasty afterlife.' instead of coming out with stupid statements about how the marriage of these two men or women here will impact on the marriages of millions of people they will never know.
Though, of course, we have to remember that experiments have shown that when two homosexual rats were exposed to a marriage licence, other rats - which were previously heterosexual and not even in the same building as the homosexual rats - spontaneously turned gay.
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
lady_lazarus said:
If you and the others like you were so confident that heterosexual marriage is sanctified by God then you could just turn around and say,'let the queers do what they like, it's their toasty afterlife.' instead of coming out with stupid statements about how the marriage of these two men or women here will impact on the marriages of millions of people they will never know.
Though, of course, we have to remember that experiments have shown that when two homosexual rats were exposed to a marriage licence, other rats - which were previously heterosexual and not even in the same building as the homosexual rats - spontaneously turned gay.
Lady L, I have to hand it to you; you have managed to make me laugh at a thread that makes me ashamed of being 'Religious' if that is how those who have faith are to be interpreted.

I think you make a good point though;

Theodore,

I you are so convinced that homosexuals will be 'toast' I would have thought you would be pleased - that means all the more 'Real estate' for you in heaven (less crowded).

I would do like to remind you that we (as mere mortals) are not supposed to judge (that is up to God himself). A true follower of Christ would, I think rather be seen as showing compassion and love for those who are aflicted with a mindset that makes thenm a target of people just like you.

I know that I believe that to be what Christ would do - give love and compassion. I wonder how you will be seen at the 'rebirth' - as a true follower of the faith (which you undoubtedly think you are) or as a judgemental, uncaring individual. Sytill, if you think you already believe that your seat is booked on the plane there..............
 

Pah

Uber all member
Theodore said:
Oh please, don’t give me this crap. What do you care what I think about your relationship? You can go and have any relationship you please, I never said you couldn’t. Just because the state doesn’t officially recognize your relationship doesn’t mean anybody is preventing you from having that relationship. Don’t be such a pathetic victim.
I thought you were acting the victim. An imagined injury that you just can't define. You cry out for the sanctity of marriage and I'll ask you how many divorced couples you know. How many of those are Christian? It's only a small segment of Christianity that clamors for protection from an "evil" and yet I'll bet 70-90% of all divorces involve Christians. Clean up your own structurely run-down house before you deny anyone else permission to build a house.
I find the idea of two men having sex with each other repellant and repugnant. I do not find love between any two people objectionable. However, I see a clear distinction between sex and love.
An awful lot of repugnance is based on a fear of the individual having homosexual thoughts - not that is the basis for your repugnance. But I'll tell you this - consider yourself tied down and blindfolded (so you can use hands to or eyes to determine the sex of a sexual partner) and you won't know the difference in most of the sexual activities that an opposite gender can perform.

It is laudable that you confine sex to a loved one - more power to you. Leave others alone. Passing law to enforce your morality on others shows just how weak your morality is as a social construct. I think it is despictable that you would force others, by law, to be confined to a religious morality.


I bear no malice toward you or anyone else.
And apparently you have no love for homosexuals either. Wasn't that the second Christian commandment?
I feel it’s my duty as a father and a citizen to help maintain a moral conscience within society. Part of that morality is to ensure the physical security of all people. Another part of that morality is to make sure we don’t descend towards Sodom and Gomorra. I have seen enough of the gay bathhouse scene to realize that it’s not far off.
I'd be intersested in hearing of your personal experiences in a bathhouse - or have you just driven by one or two. Now what would be the heterosexual equivalent of a bathhouse? - spring break? Mardis Gras? Gentlemen clubs? Prostitution? Would you care to estimate how many Christians attend those? Why is your attention and thoughts of your version of Sodom and Gomorra (and not neccessarily a correct version) not on these events? Combine that with divorce and abortion and you absolutely have no right to point a finger at homosexuals.

By all means tech your kids the hatred you seem to have - it's a parent's right. But don't claim your morality must be mine to "ensure the physical security of all people". That is pure crap. Did I see you in uniform through the cold war? If not, I've done, in over twenty years of service, more concrete actions to provide physical security for you or your parents than you can ever dream of providing with your tainted Christian morality.

I'd advise more preaching to the choir - there seems to be quite a bit of sour notes when some Christianity sings of morality.
 

Flappycat

Well-Known Member
corrupt_preist said:
my mum has tried really hard to accept me, and she did protect me from an abusive relationship i got into - long story, bu the had been lying to me about his age - a lot!
Quite lucky.

if the people with this kind of attitude towards sex were allowed marriage, either we would have quite a high gay-marriage divorce rate, or they would simply not wish to get married because they do not want to give up their current lifestyle.
How many straight fellows choose not to give up the bachelor's life? I seriously doubt there'll be many homosexual marriages at all after the initial novelty has worn off, at least not for a long time. It's a long road before the gay community fully accepts the same obligations as heterosexuals, such as faithfulness, family, and commitment. An initial step toward that is to give homosexuals access to the same marriage rights as others.

that was a good post flappycat, im really behind you 110%

C_P
Thank you.
 

Feathers in Hair

World's Tallest Hobbit
As much as I tried my darndest to read this whole thread, all I kept coming back to was hate and intolerance.

Posting smiley faces after an announcement that people would be denied the same rights as other people is about as tactful as someone giggling after calling another a 'n*gger-lover'.
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
Feathers; I have always lived life by the premise that 'Love conquers all'. I have yet to be proved right:D , but I will never give up my priciples.


Hate breeds hate; all that you can direct at hate is Love - and hope that enough servings of it will temper the hate. Don't let it get to you; you know you are right; that's the most important thing here - your conscience.
 

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
FeathersinHair said:
Oh, dear, Michel! I hope I didn't give the impression that I was giving in to hate. :(
Feathers, my friend; I don't believe you would know how to; I just meant that it sounded as if you are hurting (which is not surprizing); I was trying to restore your 'calm' to re-affirm that hate will always lose.
 

retrorich

SUPER NOT-A-MOD
Flappycat said:
Keep your god out of my life.[/b]

And people like you are making it worse!

I find YOU morally repugnant, but that doesn't mean I want to take away your right to live!

Mob rule, is it? If the majority wanted to burn Christians at the stake, then, I suppose you'd line up to be torched? The majority is wrong! A majority will not stop me from defending what I believe is right, and a majority does not make your views any less evil and repugnant. I'm not going to let you use the mob to hide from the evil within yourself. You are wrong!

This is just insulting. You're basically trashing on a homosexual couple's ability to raise a child even though there are homosexual couples out there who are ten times the parent that you could ever hope to be.

A bigot provides a morally corrupt example to the child, and they should never be trusted around children. You just called me "morally corrupt," and I insist that you take it back.

Oh, so you're a child psychologist now? Where's your degree? Every statistic I've read says quite the contrary. One statistic I read actually finds that males raised in the care of lesbians are actually less sexually adventurous than they would have been if raised in the care of heterosexual parents.

I draw the line when it comes to anything affecting my own lifestyle, and no amount of absolutely lame rationalization will convince me that this deprivation of my rights is the work of any but the most horrible sort of person.
Outstanding post!Frubals to you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top