• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Science can say nothing about existence of God

Thief

Rogue Theologian
My shell failed years ago, that's what happens when you start doing Buddhist practice. ;)

But seriously, when was the last time you seriously questioned your belief in God?
and how pray tell would I do that?
deny cause and effect?.....abandon science?
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
and how pray tell would I do that?
deny cause and effect?.....abandon science?
There is no reason to think that the big bang must adhere to the principal of cause and effect. We have seen in quantum physics that things can come in and out of existence without cause. So, it seems absurd that a singularity would be bound by this law.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
You do deny cause and effect....
You do deny science....

Once they get you to your god, out the window they go...
well duh.....
science will take you right up to the singularity.....there it stops.
no more equations, photos, fingerprints or repeatable experiments.

at the 'point'.....you're on your own.....choose
Spirit first?....or substance?
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
There is no reason to think that the big bang must adhere to the principal of cause and effect. We have seen in quantum physics that things can come in and out of existence without cause. So, it seems absurd that a singularity would be bound by this law.
so you will also abandon science at the same point.....
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
so you will also abandon science at the same point.....
This is in no way abandoning science. It is improving upon our scientific understanding of the cosmos. Many scientific assumptions have been improved upon throughout history.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
This is in no way abandoning science. It is improving upon our scientific understanding of the cosmos. Many scientific assumptions have been improved upon throughout history.
we are not discussing the cosmos....or history....
 

Shad

Veteran Member
we are not discussing the cosmos....or history....

Yet you are when you claim X created the cosmos which is also history since it is history of the universe namely how/who created it from your point of view.. Seems like you do not know what the words you are using mean.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Of course we are. The cosmos is the universe and everything in it. And you are speaking of history directly when you refer to cause and effect.
at the point of singularity.
you can't avoid the choice by spreading it over large areas.....
Spirit first?...or substance?
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Out of honesty, most likely.



You have abandoned science a long time ago, in no small measure by misrepresenting it with this obsessive claim that it must worship claims of cause and effect.
no worship required.....only a choice to be made
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Yet you are when you claim X created the cosmos which is also history since it is history of the universe namely how/who created it from your point of view.. Seems like you do not know what the words you are using mean.
try to keep up....and we start at the beginning....the singularity.
 
Top