If you study some science, it will become more clear to you why there are materials within our sediment that comes from outer space. No sediment layer provides evidence for a world wide flood. Literalists have been looking there for years and have come up empty handed.
To save time here, you need to prove that the Yucatan crater was an impact from above rather than one from below upwards. Can you do that? Also, if you claim the iridium came only from that impact and could not also have been deposited by water, show the proof! Ha.
Strange how there is so much salt around, and salt was the chosen material. Salt also had certain representative power of purity back in those days. Now, if he had say, turned her into a pillar of something not indigenous to the area? That would be much more convincing!
So when the facts meet the evidence, you claim conspiracy. Ha.
You still fail to understand that it is an "assumption"; not a "belief" Not a "conclusion". When you get that through your head, we can discuss it more.
You seem to be assuming that beliefs are not also assumed?
This is so laughable. So not only are the "origin sciences" wrong; but all the sciences that tell us about space and what's out there.
Bingo!
All the 'paleo' fraud so called sciences. Much of what is enshrined into geology, and cosmology, and theoretical astrophysics, dendrochronology, etc.
Thermodynamics, Light Theory, Color Theory, the physics of light itself.
Thermodynamics as we know it is a feature of this nature. Light theory, color, and physics are all limited to the solar system and area.
We already know they are out there. We've found several possible planets suitable for human habitation.
In your dreams. You do not know distances to any of them, therefore sizes. Yes something of some size is orbiting something else also at unknown distance. What other forces or realities out there also might exist that we have no clue about here, we do not know. What time is like there (therefore how much time any orbit or movement actually takes) we do not know!
I have had a few strange experiences for which I have found a lack of scientific explanation. I don't know the explanation of these experiences. So, because I don't know the explanations of these experiences I don't "make one up" like: Hey! Demons and Spirits!
You admit being ignorant of what they were so no one would ask you what possible spiritual connection may or may not exist.
Soooooo ..... anywone who disagrees with you are not of God. Got it!
No, His word!
I do not agree with abortion as a form of "birth control" nor do I condone late-term abortion. But you perception about this very complex topic is utterly myopic.
Child sacrifice and murder.
For starters, if it is not the offspring of the husband, God actually commands it:
Numbers 5:11-31
Of course babies are from both parents. As for your chapter, there was a command for a nation long ago to come before God (His priest at the time) and see if they had disobeyed or not. A test of drinking some water was given. Nothing to do with sacrificing people.
It is very clear. If victorious, J promised to sacrifice the 1st thing he saw when he returned. God is omnicient, so already knew what the first thing he saw would be. God accepted that promise. Upon returning, J's little girl comes out of the house to celebrate his return.
Samuel's mom sacrificed her son to God also. In the case of the foolish rash mouthed king, there are a few opinions as to what happened. I suspect the opinion that she was not killed is the best. In any case the bible abounds with bad examples of sinners, that are included in the record. The commands of God and Scripture are what they were disobeying! God clearly loves kids and hated people sacrificing them to pagan idols.
By the way, nowhere does it say God accepted the sacrifice! Knowing Jesus, He would not do so, if the guy actually tried. Now in the sacrifice of Solomon at the temple, God did send fire for the sacrifice. Not in any sacrifice of some sinner with a big yap.
God's a garbage scowl, now. But he left all that evidence to convince us of evolution and old earth? Tricky, tricky, tricky!
No evidence of the theory of evolution exists actually. None whatsoever. The mere ability in this nature to e able to slowly evolve and adapt is not evidence we came from worms or bacteria or...whatever! As for the old earth that depends how we look at it. Sciences uses belief. To them it looks old therefore!