McBell
Unbound
Good question.Why not Satanism?
I mean, even the IRS sees Satanism as a religion....
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Good question.Why not Satanism?
Buddhism has nothing to do with any deity, however.We don't see satanism as a religion as we do not believe it is revealed by God but man made.
Buddhism has nothing to do with any deity, however.
That's anti-clericalist rubbish and offensive to those who accept Holy Orders as valid and required. As for the rest of your post, it's logically impossible to accept all religions as true. You, yourself, are being a hypocrite because you don't accept all religions as true, yourself. So why continue to spout idiotic rhetoric?
Of course I don't find all religions as true. I think that most religions have varying degrees of truth in them and I can respect them on that basis, as well as respecting the diversity of human views and experiences in this area. However, it's just a fact that some religions are just stupid, wrong and/or outright harmful. Moreover, no, I do not accept Mohammad or Baha'u'llah as messengers of God. (I respect the Buddha but he would abhor being thought of as the messenger of any deity.) You'll just have to get over the fact that people are not going to agree with you.
What makes a religion "revealed by god"?We don't see satanism as a religion as we do not believe it is revealed by God but man made.
Buddhism has nothing to do with any deity, however.
The claim by an individual of revelation. Thus, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Saul/Paul, Helen Shucman, Joseph Smith, Muhammad, Isaiah, Baha'u'llah, Akenaton and countless others are all the possessors of religions "revealed by god." Thus, there are either a multiplicity of gods with different messages to reveal, or a multiplicity of liars. I don't claim to know which, but I have very strong leanings...What makes a religion "revealed by god"?
What makes a religion "revealed by god"?
Why does it have to be revealed by "god"?The Two proofs that a religion is revealed by God are the Prophet Himself, His Life and His Holy Book or Teachings. After They pass away Their Holy Book.
It is left for us to choose to follow or reject it.
You are so utterly clueless that I am literally almost without words to respond. You apparently have no concept of what it is you have written. It's like the old joke about the fellow who says to his friend, "I was on the bus today and the most amazing happened. I was seated across from a man who, except for the fact that there was absolutely no resemblance whatsoever, looked exactly like you."
Why does it have to be revealed by "god"?
Unfortunately, this doesn't say anything of real worth -- although it does try to imply that there is something that is "revealed" that is of worth. The problem, you see, is that with all the searching we've ever done in the world, every single scripture, every book, every sentence, every word, every letter, every punctuation mark, was written by man. Not divine, not infallible and not all knowing.Man made religion can be revealed by man but not Divine religion because man is not Divine or infallible and all knowing.
The claim by an individual of revelation. Thus, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Saul/Paul, Helen Shucman, Joseph Smith, Muhammad, Isaiah, Baha'u'llah, Akenaton and countless others are all the possessors of religions "revealed by god." Thus, there are either a multiplicity of gods with different messages to reveal, or a multiplicity of liars. I don't claim to know which, but I have very strong leanings...
Unfortunately, this doesn't say anything of real worth -- although it does try to imply that there is something that is "revealed" that is of worth. The problem, you see, is that with all the searching we've ever done in the world, every single scripture, every book, every sentence, every word, every letter, every punctuation mark, was written by man. Not divine, not infallible and not all knowing.
Now, if you think that you have some way of determining that the scripture you love actually does come from a divine, infallible and all knowing source, can you do two things for us?
1. Tell us why you think so, and
2. Explain the mistakes?
The claim by an individual of revelation. Thus, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Saul/Paul, Helen Shucman, Joseph Smith, Muhammad, Isaiah, Baha'u'llah, Akenaton and countless others are all the possessors of religions "revealed by god." Thus, there are either a multiplicity of gods with different messages to reveal, or a multiplicity of liars. I don't claim to know which, but I have very strong leanings...
We are told the Buddha taught the oneness of God but that His original teachings have been lost. We accept that but respect others who think otherwise.
I've never held truck with this kind of claim. It's essentially God-of-the-gaps theology. 'There's an indeterminate amount of time between when Buddha died and when the first written Buddhist scriptures appear so we'll just insert our God in there and say it's what he really taught'. It's such a disgusting attempt at religious imperialism.
So if the religion does not claim to be given by a god, it cannot be a religion?Man made religion can be revealed by man but not Divine religion because man is not Divine or infallible and all knowing.
So if the religion does not claim to be given by a god, it cannot be a religion?
The Prophets of God, They are the Ones to make that call and Who I refer to in giving any answer in that subject. I, myself do not decide which is a true religion and which is not.
We only know which religions are true from Baha'u'llah's Revelation.
We are told Buddhist, Hindu, Islam, Babi, Baha'i, Zoroastrian, Christian and Sabean and that before recorded history there were also Prophets but Their names have been lost.