Seven Reasons it's easier to Believe in God than to Accept Evolution

[LuisDantas]

Dear Luis, I support what I write with Science and History so your stock answer doesn't work with me.

Spare me of your lies. I have no time for them.

 

[Aman777]

Spare me of your lies. I have no time for them.

Dear Luis, Tell me this if you can since you are a member of the STAFF. Is it against the rules to call someone else a Liar? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Monk Of Reason]

Dear Luis, Tell me this if you can since you are a member of the STAFF. Is it against the rules to call someone else a Liar? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

Not if it is supported in the face of obvious glaring evidence.

 

[Aman777]

Not if it is supported in the face of obvious glaring evidence.

Dear Monk, I have seen NO rebuke of my evidence and NO presentation of any Evol evidence which shows that Apes magically evolved into Humans. So, where is the support for your false accusation? Come on and present it, Mr Reason. I promise not to laugh. God Bless you.

In Love,

 

[RichardParker]

Dear Richard, Humans were made some 10 Billion years BEFORE any other living creature and did NOT become animals when they sinned. Humans became flesh, like animals, but could NOT have evolved from animals since we were made BEFORE animals. Today's Science has much to learn but freely chooses to remain ignorant of God's Truth by ignoring God's classification system which involves His (Jesus) kinds and Their (Trinity) kinds.

Now, I don't buy ANY of this, because it goes against everything we know about the real world...
But it's completly irrelevant...
Because if you had read my comment carefully, you would have noticed that I've actually already said: It doesn't even matter if we evolved from other animals or not! Our classification as animals is NOT based on evolution, it's based on the fact that we share ALL the characteristics that describe animals. The definition used for the word "animal" matches humans. That's why humans are animals. Evolution certainly explains WHY we are animals, but that we are animals is simply a fact.

False, since animals evolved from water and Humans were a Special Creation made by the Hands of Jesus. Gen 2:4-7 In the end, Humans will again regain our FIRST place position which is to have dominion or rule over every animal, including Apes.

I'm not sure if you don't want to understand my point, or if you deliberatly ignore my actual argument.

What are animals?
Animals are eucaryotic, multicellular organisms that eat and digest other organic materials and don't posses any cell walls or chloroplasts. That's simply the definition of what an animal is.

What are humans?
Humans are eucaryotic, multicellular organisms that eat and digest other organic materials and don't posses any cell walls or chloroplasts.
If you don't believe that, maybe do some experiments to test, if these characteristics apply to you.

Therefore humans are animals. Even if we were created first, and not in water, and so on, and so forth... doesn't matter.
I could agree with your ENTIRE fable here, and humans would STILL be animals.

Theistic Evols are WRONG since they MUST ignore what God told us in order to come up with their False position. God tells us that Humans were formed (like a Potter molds the Clay) Gen 2:4-7 and that EVERY other creature came forth from the water. Gen 1:21 IOW, there were TWO creations of living creatures.

And again, you're missing the point.
At NO point was I arguing that theistic evolution was correct. YOU were arguing that people believe in evolution to deny a god. The fact that people believe in evolution AND a god (not YOUR god, clearly, but a god never the less) shows that your claim is wrong.

I agree that today's Godless Science has REJECTED God's Truth in Genesis and Falsely teaches our children their UnSupportable view that we Magically evolved from Apes.

Magic is part of genesis. Not evolution. Evolution doesn't require magic at any point.
Also, evolution is not only supportable, but actually supported. By pretty much every scientific field. It disagrees with your story, sure. But given that we have the scientific, physical evidence, and you only have an old book, that also claims that we can cure diseases by dipping birds into the blood of other birds, I think I know who has the more reliable source.

ONLY if you REJECT God's Truth in favor of the Unprovable ToE, which is the Biggest Satanic Lie ever told. Do you believe God or men who have rejected God's Truth?

I really wonder at this point, if you deliberatly miss the point.
I explain that evolution is irrelevant, and your answer is "only if you believe in evolution".
This doesn't make sense. It can't even make sense in your own head, so I have to assume that you didn't even read my comment.

To your question:
I believe those who can present evidence. Scientists do present evidence. Your god... well, he doesn't even present evidence for his existence, let alone evidence for the creation-myth. All he gives me are people like you, who clearly don't even read my responding comment. So, why on earth would I trust your (apparently imaginary) god?

It's YOUR free choice, but there are consequences for your UnBelief.

Believes aren't a matter of "free choices". I don't CHOOSE what I believe. Either I am convinced of a proposition, or I'm not.
I'm convinced that evolution is the most reliable explanation for the diversity of life. I'm not only convinced but know for a fact that humans ARE animal (independed of evolution, simply because they fit the definition of what an animal is) and I'm not convinced that your god exists, or that genesis is true (actually, when it comes to genesis it doesn't even make much sense, so I'm not even convinced that it is POSSIBLE that it is true).

 

[Sapiens]

Dear Monk, I have seen NO rebuke of my evidence and NO presentation of any Evol evidence which shows that Apes magically evolved into Humans.

You have presented NO EVIDENCE of any sort, just unsupported claims, as I will continue to point out whenever necessary.

The only truth in your statement is that there is no evidence that anything magically evolved in anything. No magic is required.

 

[Thief]

You have presented NO EVIDENCE of any sort, just unsupported claims, as I will continue to point out whenever necessary.

The only truth in your statement is that there is no evidence that anything magically evolved in anything. No magic is required.

Just the poser of creation.

 

[Monk Of Reason]

Dear Monk, I have seen NO rebuke of my evidence and NO presentation of any Evol evidence which shows that Apes magically evolved into Humans. So, where is the support for your false accusation? Come on and present it, Mr Reason. I promise not to laugh. God Bless you.

In Love,

When you present the evidence we can rebuke it. However you continue to post bible verses and nonsense.

 

[s2a]

Interesting article. Can you think of other reasons it's easier for us to believe in god than it is for us to accept evolution?

If only "easier" were the best path in obtaining enlightenment through discovery... "God" did it", that settles it!".

...maybe then cell phones, microwave ovens, automobiles, air conditioning, and medical "miracles" are really just "magic"...

That WOULD be easier to believe....agreed.

But then, the ugly head arises... if we have "magic", then who needs a "god"?

 

[Sapiens]

Just the poser of creation.

Creation, if that's what you want to call it, happened ... any supernatural explanation as to how it came about is, at best, an argument from ignorance not a claim supported by evidence.

 

[Aman777]

Now, I don't buy ANY of this, because it goes against everything we know about the real world...
But it's completly irrelevant...
Because if you had read my comment carefully, you would have noticed that I've actually already said: It doesn't even matter if we evolved from other animals or not! Our classification as animals is NOT based on evolution, it's based on the fact that we share ALL the characteristics that describe animals. The definition used for the word "animal" matches humans. That's why humans are animals. Evolution certainly explains WHY we are animals, but that we are animals is simply a fact.

I'm not sure if you don't want to understand my point, or if you deliberatly ignore my actual argument.

What are animals?
Animals are eucaryotic, multicellular organisms that eat and digest other organic materials and don't posses any cell walls or chloroplasts. That's simply the definition of what an animal is.

What are humans?
Humans are eucaryotic, multicellular organisms that eat and digest other organic materials and don't posses any cell walls or chloroplasts.
If you don't believe that, maybe do some experiments to test, if these characteristics apply to you.

Therefore humans are animals. Even if we were created first, and not in water, and so on, and so forth... doesn't matter.
I could agree with your ENTIRE fable here, and humans would STILL be animals.

And again, you're missing the point.
At NO point was I arguing that theistic evolution was correct. YOU were arguing that people believe in evolution to deny a god. The fact that people believe in evolution AND a god (not YOUR god, clearly, but a god never the less) shows that your claim is wrong.

Magic is part of genesis. Not evolution. Evolution doesn't require magic at any point.
Also, evolution is not only supportable, but actually supported. By pretty much every scientific field. It disagrees with your story, sure. But given that we have the scientific, physical evidence, and you only have an old book, that also claims that we can cure diseases by dipping birds into the blood of other birds, I think I know who has the more reliable source.

I really wonder at this point, if you deliberatly miss the point.
I explain that evolution is irrelevant, and your answer is "only if you believe in evolution".
This doesn't make sense. It can't even make sense in your own head, so I have to assume that you didn't even read my comment.

To your question:
I believe those who can present evidence. Scientists do present evidence. Your god... well, he doesn't even present evidence for his existence, let alone evidence for the creation-myth. All he gives me are people like you, who clearly don't even read my responding comment. So, why on earth would I trust your (apparently imaginary) god?

Believes aren't a matter of "free choices". I don't CHOOSE what I believe. Either I am convinced of a proposition, or I'm not.
I'm convinced that evolution is the most reliable explanation for the diversity of life. I'm not only convinced but know for a fact that humans ARE animal (independed of evolution, simply because they fit the definition of what an animal is) and I'm not convinced that your god exists, or that genesis is true (actually, when it comes to genesis it doesn't even make much sense, so I'm not even convinced that it is POSSIBLE that it is true).

Dear Richard, You have freely chosen to ignore God because you THINK you know more than He does. God tells us that Adam, the first Human, was made the 3rd Day, which is the SAME Day as the Big Bang of our world. Gen 2:4-7 This was some 10 Billion years BEFORE the FIRST living creature (bacteria) was created and brought forth from the water, on the 5th Day. Gen 1:21

Now, it's YOUR time to explain HOW Humans could have evolved from creatures which were made Billions of years AFTER Adam was made. Just because Godless Scientists has declared that they know better than God, where we came from, does NOT make it so. God Bless you.

in Love,
Aman

 

[Sapiens]

Dear Richard, You have freely chosen to ignore God because you THINK you know more than He does. God tells us that Adam, the first Human, was made the 3rd Day,

Unsupported claim.

which is the SAME Day as the Big Bang of our world. Gen 2:4-7 This was some 10 Billion years BEFORE the FIRST living creature (bacteria) was created and brought forth from the water, on the 5th Day. Gen 1:21

Unsupported claim.

Now, it's YOUR time to explain HOW Humans could have evolved from creatures which were made Billions of years AFTER Adam was made.

Unsupported claim.

Just because Godless Scientists has declared that they know better than God, where we came from, does NOT make it so.

Unsupported claim.

 

[Ultimatum]

You always assume victory when you do nothing but stating your opinion.


Dude, listen to others points of view and discuss things.

If you don't want to do this with me than fine. But try doing it with others.



Evolution is not a fact. That is why it is called "THEORY of evolution"

Oh god... it's a "god dun it becuz i cnt understand evulution"

 

[Sapiens]

Run the "Theory" ratchet again: CA201

 

[idav]

.... Godless Scientists has declared that they know better than God.....

That sounds like quite the catchy headline. Where did you hear it? I've been waiting for scientists to finally claim their rightful spot in godhood.

 

[Sapiens]

It's kinda an oxymoronic tautology.

 

[Aman777]

Unsupported claim.
Unsupported claim.
Unsupported claim.
Unsupported claim.

Dear Readers, Unbelievers call good evil and evil good, so I appreciate this vote of confidence from an avowed Atheist. God Bless all of you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Aman777]

That sounds like quite the catchy headline. Where did you hear it? I've been waiting for scientists to finally claim their rightful spot in godhood.

Dear idav, Godless scientists also teach the Fairytale that Humans evolved from the common ancestor of Apes. IOW, When you come right down to it, they will teach ANYthing which will help in the worship of their precious False Theory of Evolution. That's WHY I call it Satanic. ONLY Satan could fool so many for so long, especially those who THINK they know everything. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Aman777]

It's kinda an oxymoronic tautology.

Dear Readers, Either the above poster has lost it or he's just bellowing into the wind, since NO one knows to whom he is bellowing. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Sapiens]

No, just playing with words (you know what a pun is) that's why the ""