Wack-a-doodle, do.
Dear Readers, It seems obvious that the above poster has NO argument left. All he can manage is to call names or maybe he is role playing a Rooster. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wack-a-doodle, do.
Dear Idav, Then, what is the difference between animal and human intelligence? IF there is no difference, then WHY don't we have trials for animals in our Legal System? God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Interesting article. Can you think of other reasons it's easier for us to believe in god than it is for us to accept evolution?
Well ... you are half way there. Good job as far as it goes.Personally, believe in the Theistic Evolution theory and so I believe in both evolution and God. I don't see any conflicts between the two either.
Aman:>>Most Evols have been brain washed since childhood to accept the ridiculous notion that they are nothing but evolved Apes, but you appear to be proud of the silly idea that your ancestors were nothing but nasty old dirty animals. Correct?
Dear Richard, Misguided scientists classify Humans as animals because they have rejected God's Truth that Humans are a Special Creation made BEFORE any other living creature. Gen 2:4-7 What confuses them is their desire to avoid the righteous judgment of God for their evil deeds.
God shows the difference between Humans and animals by showing that Humans are destined to have dominion or rule of every other living creature, Gen 1:28 because Humans are the descendants of Adam, the first Human, who was made with an intelligence like God's, and not like some old dumb animal. Gen 3:22 God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Wack-a-doodle, do.
He's right, when we get down to the really stupid stuff, like man's dominion over the Earth (some dominion, the Earth gonna kill us right quick in return for our mistreatment and dominion taint gonna mean squat), then I start running out of patience for sensible answers ... it's Wack-a-doodle, do time, might as well enjoy it!Dear Readers, It seems obvious that the above poster has NO argument left. All he can manage is to call names or maybe he is role playing a Rooster. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
No.Dear Richard, Misguided scientists classify Humans as animals...
... because they have rejected God's Truth that Humans are a Special Creation made BEFORE any other living creature.
God shows the difference between Humans and animals by showing that Humans are destined to have dominion or rule of every other living creature, Gen 1:28 because Humans are the descendants of Adam, the first Human, who was made with an intelligence like God's, and not like some old dumb animal. Gen 3:22
There should be a trial, an animal shouldnt be just shot. Besides a man can go to jail for killing a bear.
Aside from your strawman, it is very difficult to undertand their potential without finding some common ground for language first. Great apes are able to learn language so they are certainly able to understand right and wrong, but right and wrong are learned and/or experienced for any animal even human apes.
Personally, believe in the Theistic Evolution theory and so I believe in both evolution and God. I don't see any conflicts between the two either.
He's right, when we get down to the really stupid stuff, like man's dominion over the Earth (some dominion, the Earth gonna kill us right quick in return for our mistreatment and dominion taint gonna mean squat), then I start running out of patience for sensible answers ... it's Wack-a-doodle, do time, might as well enjoy it!
Your book can not be shown to be meaningful, in fact it can be shown to be highly flawed. So quoting it is a waste of all of our time. It is irrelevant and has not bearing on any of the real issues. You might as well be reading and quoting Hans Christian Anderson.Dear Sapiens, Your mistake is in thinking that Genesis Chapter ONE is in the past. Man's dominion or rule over "every other living creature" is in the FUTURE and will NOT take place until AFTER Jesus returns to this Planet and changes EVERY lving creature into a Vegetarian. Gen 1:30
I will agree with you IF you can show us a time in the past when EVERY animal ate green herbs for meat, which you CANNOT. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
No.
Humans are animals. That's just a fact. We are multicellular, eucariotic organisms which require other organic compounts as food and don't have any cell-walls or chloroplasts...
With other words: We are animals. Because that's the definition of an animal, at least it is in biology. And when you are talking about classification, you are talking about biology.
If you have a different definition for what YOU think the word "animal" means, feel free to share. But it doesn't change the fact that however you call the taxonomic group "animalia", humans are part of that. Your opinion on that doesn't change the facts.
Unless, of course, you can show that we are NOT f.e. multicellular organisms.
Even if that was true... we would STILL be animals. We have all the characterisitics of animals, therefore, we are animals. Even IF we were seperatly created, your god would still have created us as animals. This is just a fact.
Also: You claim that this has been done to "deny god" or something like that...?
How do you explain the millions of theists who accept the fact that we are animals? If there wasn't any objective reason for us to call ourselves "animals", but just an opinion based on our views on god... you would think that the majority of theists would reject that.
Not to forget: Our classification, as said before, doens't say anything about the existence of a god.
So, your argumentation fails in many different ways.
Actually, I could grant you ALL of that, and we would STILL be animals. Because we have the objectivly verifiable characteristics that are diagnostic for animals. Which, as a consequnce makes us animals.
Although, I have to say, I don't buy any of what you've said here. This idea has been disproven quite a while ago. And I won't just believe it, just because some old book says it so. I know many old books with fascinating creation-stories, but I'm not going to believe all of them, just because they are writen in some scriptures, and I will even less believe them, when they stand in oposition of our current scientific understanding.
Claim without evidence, just more quotes.Dear Richard, Humans were made some 10 Billion years BEFORE any other living creature and did NOT become animals when they sinned. Humans became flesh, like animals, but could NOT have evolved from animals since we were made BEFORE animals. Today's Science has much to learn but freely chooses to remain ignorant of God's Truth by ignoring God's classification system which involves His (Jesus) kinds and Their (Trinity) kinds.
Claim without evidence, just more quotes.False, since animals evolved from water and Humans were a Special Creation made by the Hands of Jesus. Gen 2:4-7 In the end, Humans will again regain our FIRST place position which is to have dominion or rule over every animal, including Apes.
Claim without evidence, just more quotes.Theistic Evols are WRONG since they MUST ignore what God told us in order to come up with their False position. God tells us that Humans were formed (like a Potter molds the Clay) Gen 2:4-7 and that EVERY other creature came forth from the water. Gen 1:21 IOW, there were TWO creations of living creatures.
Claim without evidence, at least there were no quotes.I agree that today's Godless Science has REJECTED God's Truth in Genesis and Falsely teaches our children their UnSupportable view that we Magically evolved from Apes.
Claim without evidence, at least there were no quotes.ONLY if you REJECT God's Truth in favor of the Unprovable ToE, which is the Biggest Satanic Lie ever told. Do you believe God or men who have rejected God's Truth?
Claim without evidence, at least there were no quotes.It's YOUR free choice, but there are consequences for your UnBelief. God Bless you.
Claim without evidence, just more quotes.
Claim without evidence, just more quotes.
Claim without evidence, just more quotes.
Claim without evidence, at least there were no quotes.
Claim without evidence, at least there were no quotes.
Claim without evidence, at least there were no quotes.
Claim without evidence, at least there were no quotes.Dear Sapiens, That's a thousand times more than your unsupportable personal atheistic opinon, backed by nothing but Bluff. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
There is opinion, and then there are scientific findings and theory, backed by fossil and biological evidence both.Dear Sapiens, That's a thousand times more than your unsupportable personal atheistic opinon, backed by nothing but Bluff. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Dear Sapiens, That's a thousand times more than your unsupportable personal atheistic opinon, backed by nothing but Bluff. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
There is opinion, and then there are scientific findings and theory, backed by fossil and biological evidence both.
It is too bad that you do not understand the difference, for it is quite huge.
All he has got, all he has ever had, all he has ever presented, are bible quotes, despite copious promises of actual evidence(s). It is my intent, from hear forward, to try not to engage in discussion or direct debate, which has proven useless in the face of his dogmatic bible thumping, but rather to simply point out each and every unsupported claim that he makes.