Jensa said:I think a better question would be "which ones don't?"
Surely you Taoists must have shed blood at some time ?............c'mon, give!!:biglaugh:
You are quite right, of course.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Jensa said:I think a better question would be "which ones don't?"
jeffrey said:Very insightful. It is my contention, that even though this bloodshed was in God's name, God had nothing to do with it. Just because it was written as so, does not make it so. Man has a thing about killing, then stating God told me to.
jeffrey said:Moses, commanded by God, in Numbers 7-18, wiped out an entire city, killed the male children, the women who were not virgins were also killed. The virgins were spared to be raped when they so desired... I'll ask again. If our soldiers did this, what would be thought of them?
Albigensian_CrusadeAdstar said:True followers of Jesus have never engaged in mortal combat on earth since Jesus told us to love our enemies. Of course there have been many false christians and false christian organizations who have rebelled against the Words of Jesus and have taken part in combat. But that does not make Christianity a bloody religion. That just makes false Christianity a bloody religion. False christianity is Not Christianity and therefore one cannot use the action of false christians to attack Christianity.
You're right...Christ did say to turn the other cheek...I messed up there and I apologize to you.Despite my mistake...If you read the OT of the Bible...God mandated that death was the punishment for certain sin...yes, cities were destroyed under the instruction of God. Obviously...God did mandate that certain laws change...through Christ...a NEW covenant was established. I'll happily quote scripture if you need to SEE where God set punishment as death.I understand that God has always acted in a way...that mankind could benefit...The Christ that I worship of the NT and God Almighty of the OT are the very same...you're dealing with two separate covenants under God.jeffrey said:Show me were he said that. I believed he replied to someone that asked him that, turn the other cheek. Now, your saying God changed his mind? That in the OT it was ok to murder whole towns in the name of revenge? Look at what you're saying. Christ also said he was not there to change the laws.
jeffrey said:So, you're saying God has changed his mind? That it was ok to kill children, taking joy in smashing their bodies against rocks, killing women, unless they were still virgins, in which case it was ok to take them and rape them at your own convenience?
jeffrey said:I'll state this again. Man makes excuses for killing. NEVER will I believe that God has ever condoned these actions.
You never answered the post before that.dawny0826 said:To each his/her own.
Maggie
Whether people who did these things were false Christians or not is a laughable argument. They professed to be Christian. It is nice when you can try to wiggle out of the fact that terrible things have been done in the name of Christianity, but trying to say they were false Christians doesn't wash. They were Christians and they did these terrible things. Period.
Additionally, I assure you that there were many men who fought in both the First and Second World Wars who were followers of Jesus and fought in mortal combat. Oh yeah, also the Korean and Vietnam wars as well. So to say that no follower of Jesus has fought in mortal combat just isn't so. Just ask the surviving relatives of those who died in those wars and I think they would agree with me on that.
The Truth said:This is what the jewish said to their prophet Moses when he commanded them to enter to the holy land which God gave to them. So, they disobied God out of fear of fighting.
God can make anyone dead anytime he please but this life is a test for us, human beings, whether we believe in him or disbelieve.
[20] Remember Musa said to his people: "O my People! call in remembrance the favour of Allah unto you, when He produced prophets among you, made you kings, and gave you what He had not given to any other among the peoples.
[21] "O my people! enter the holy land which Allah hath assigned unto you, and turn not back Ignominiously, for then will ye be overthrown, to your own ruin."
[22] They said: "O Musa! in this land are a people of exceeding strength: never shall we enter it until they leave it: if (once) they leave, then shall we enter."
[23] (But) among (their) God-fearing men were two on whom Allah had bestowed His grace: they said: "Assault them at the (proper) Gate: when once ye are in, victory will be yours; But on Allah put your trust if ye have faith."
[24] They said: "O Musa! while they remain there, never shall we be able to enter, to the end of time. Go thou, and thy Lord, and fight ye two, while we sit here (and watch)."
[25] He said: "O my Lord! I have power only over myself and my brother: so separate us from this rebellious people!"
[26] Allah said: "Therefore will the land be out of their reach for forty years: in distraction will they wander through the land: but sorrow thou not over these rebellious people. (Quran Surah 5)
Actually, i'm surprised in how many christians deny the OT while they hold it under thier arm when they preach.
How can a christian who believe in the whole bible as the word of God say no no, oh, that was the OT God not the NT one !!!
If they are one person (the father and the son), is that mean Jesus was part of that thing (because the trinity say Jesus is part of God, so he was there !!!)
I have been confused about this since a while :bonk:
Any thoughts?
Halcyon said:Albigensian_Crusade
That was instigated by the Papacy of the only Church of modern Christianity that existed at the time.
Other crusades were for land and riches. Tha Albigensian crusade's sole purpose was the destruction of the religion of the Good Men.