Wow. Where to begin? Um, where else would Aristotelian logic come from? Last I checked, Aristotle was a Greek, right?
If there is no relativity in God, then why do so many people have so many different ideas about him, some of them conflicting?
Humans discovered logic. Logic is like math, not a belief. You don't make it up, it's already there, and everyone uses the same kind. Please explain how an atheist's logic is screwed up? Examples would be great.
What's wrong morally with Communists? Is it bad to want everyone to be equal in all things?
How do the premises of an atheist change? There is no God, done. That's the premise of an atheist, and has been ever since there was a word "Atheist".
So, anything that challenges your faith is stupid stuff only meant to distract you from blindly believing in something illogical?
Give me an example of using Aristotelian logic in my daily life. And then tell me how that is bad.
Please feel free to point out the fallacies in my logic. If there are fallacies, I'd love to fix them.
Please pardon the GadFly if my presentation is too harsh. I mean no disrespect. I am trying to learn to be less harsh with my opinion. The hard line is an attempt to get people's attention. This point of view is often overlooked. What I am trying to do is to motivate a consistently used thought process which I believe will bring unity among men.
Aristotelian logic is based on the fact that truth does not change. Plato's forms, for example, are truths. A chair is known to be a chair. It may be a three legged chair. When it has four or five legs, it is still a chair. The concept of mother is a truth. When mother hugs you or spanks you, it is still mother. Mother is always the same and does not change. All truth comes from the most basic premises, the Absolute truth, which is God. What Plato called a "form" we might think of as a definition, say a chair. A chair is always a chair for everybody. Its truth does not rest on different mens opinion. It is what it is.
Other truths are also self evident. Americans believe in self evident truths and record these in the Constitution of the USA. Just like mother is self evident so is liberty, freedom of speech, and the pursuit of happiness.The right to defend yourself is self evident. This right does not change.
Liberals on the Supreme Court do not believe God or religion should no be part of government. These Judges believe the definition of what is true changes. Truth to them changes relative to man's perceived needs.These Judges are perceived to write new law instead of interpreting the law. But what they are doing is interpreting the law based on the belief that premises of truth changes.
The fallacies of Aristotelian logic comes when the definition of the premises change.This type of logic is called Hegelian logic, which was adopted by the Communist and atheistic societies. Liberals share this logic and resent being told so.
All men are created equal in that they all have the same gift of logic but it would be bad to be equal in all things. I don't want another person to have a wife like mine. I want her all to myself. I want a higher standard of living than my neighbor and I am willing to work for it. I don't want equality in that sense.
Stupid stuff was not a good term for me to have used as it might have offended somebody, for which I apologize. But, do you see how changing premises create fallacies in Hegelian logic and is often called evil?
Why do so many conflicting ideas about God exist? God is the only perfect premise, the Absolute. Man is not perfect but man that seeks truth is working to become perfect. Error is constantly working its way into man 's natural logical process so it appears that man never gets it right completely and all at one time. This explains world conflict which is always as bad as the errors that have worked into the natural process. The natural process of thinking on stable values is God's evidence to man that God exist. From this, the duty of man is to seek God.
Thank you for listening
GadFly