• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should Believers Avoid and Fear Athiest?

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Please pardon the GadFly if my presentation is too harsh. I mean no disrespect. I am trying to learn to be less harsh with my opinion. The hard line is an attempt to get people's attention. This point of view is often overlooked. What I am trying to do is to motivate a consistently used thought process which I believe will bring unity among men.

You need to try harder then. Out of all of your posts that I've read only this and one other was anything close to respectful.

All men are created equal in that they all have the same gift of logic but it would be bad to be equal in all things. I don't want another person to have a wife like mine. I want her all to myself. I want a higher standard of living than my neighbor and I am willing to work for it. I don't want equality in that sense.

Then, you don't want your neighbor to be just as happy as you? That's very selfish. Most religions would say that that is a bad view to hold. I think it's human nature, but human nature isn't always the most productive way to go. That's why we try to get past it sometimes, and that's why communism came into existence. It is also, sadly, why communism failed, because people couldn't be happy with everyone being completely equal. Many people only feel good about themselves when they feel superior to others.

Stupid stuff was not a good term for me to have used as it might have offended somebody, for which I apologize. But, do you see how changing premises create fallacies in Hegelian logic and is often called evil?

Actually I don't see. Maybe you could explain it better, please?
 

GadFly

Active Member
You need to try harder then. Out of all of your posts that I've read only this and one other was anything close to respectful.

Then, you don't want your neighbor to be just as happy as you? That's very selfish. Most religions would say that that is a bad view to hold. I think it's human nature, but human nature isn't always the most productive way to go. That's why we try to get past it sometimes, and that's why communism came into existence. It is also, sadly, why communism failed, because people couldn't be happy with everyone being completely equal. Many people only feel good about themselves when they feel superior to others.

Actually I don't see. Maybe you could explain it better, please?

I never knew you existed until last night but I have always been aware of your tactics. I point them out and obviously your angry about this. No attack on you was ever personal. It just happened that the image I have of an atheist fits you well. I know of your attempt to turn logic upside down like the communist do. At least you admit that communism failed. It had nothing to do with any body's selfishness. It had to do with the logic of communism and of the atheist. It is difficult to not feel superior to communist logic when it has failed so helplessly.

Your way of behaving is not new to anyone. From a free of speech, American education, democrats (not the party) have learned of the evils of communism from childhood. Your lack of respect for others can not be hidden in a democratic society. You can try to intimidate others on this forum by calling names, making false accusations, and threatening but it will not work for long. All we have to do is to hold our ground and you'll reveal to everybody your communistic purposes, which will be rejected. Well, until the collapse of communism happens, let's enjoy intellectual debate. It's better than shooting each other, don't you think.
GadFly God bless:yes:
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
I never knew you existed until last night but I have always been aware of your tactics. I point them out and obviously your angry about this. No attack on you was ever personal. It just happened that the image I have of an atheist fits you well. I know of your attempt to turn logic upside down like the communist do. At least you admit that communism failed. It had nothing to do with any body's selfishness. It had to do with the logic of communism and of the atheist. It is difficult to not feel superior to communist logic when it has failed so helplessly.

Your way of behaving is not new to anyone. From a free of speech, American education, democrats (not the party) have learned of the evils of communism from childhood. Your lack of respect for others can not be hidden in a democratic society. You can try to intimidate others on this forum by calling names, making false accusations, and threatening but it will not work for long. All we have to do is to hold our ground and you'll reveal to everybody your communistic purposes, which will be rejected. Well, until the collapse of communism happens, let's enjoy intellectual debate. It's better than shooting each other, don't you think.
GadFly God bless:yes:

It's too bad there are people who think like you out there.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
log·ic /ˈlɒdʒ
thinsp.png
ɪk/[loj-ik] 1.the science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference. 2.a particular method of reasoning or argumentation: We were unable to follow his logic. 3.the system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study. 4.reason or sound judgment, as in utterances or actions: There wasn't much logic in her move. 5.convincing forcefulness; inexorable truth or persuasiveness: the irresistible logic of the facts.


Scientific Method n. a method of research in which a problem is identified, relevant data are gathered, a hypothesis is formulated from these data, and the hypothesis is empirically tested. The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation, generally involving the observation of phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis concerning the phenomena, experimentation to demonstrate the truth or falseness of the hypothesis, and a conclusion that validates or modifies the hypothesis.


Now you know. Good day, sir.
 

GadFly

Active Member
log·ic /ˈlɒdʒ
thinsp.png
ɪk/[loj-ik] 1.the science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference. 2.a particular method of reasoning or argumentation: We were unable to follow his logic. 3.the system or principles of reasoning applicable to any branch of knowledge or study. 4.reason or sound judgment, as in utterances or actions: There wasn't much logic in her move. 5.convincing forcefulness; inexorable truth or persuasiveness: the irresistible logic of the facts.


Scientific Method n. The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation, generally involving the observation of phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis concerning the phenomena, experimentation to demonstrate the truth or falseness of the hypothesis, and a conclusion that validates or modifies the hypothesis.


Now you know. Good day, sir.

You don't know how to use a dictionary either. The science of social studies and the arts is one word and the science of testing and measurements of scientific facts is something else too. Try the encyclopedia, its a bigger book. Didn't they teach you about semantics in your school? :sleep:
 

Nanda

Polyanna
**************************MOD ADVISORY*************************


Let's keep things civil and impersonal in here, folks.
 

Dirty Penguin

Master Of Ceremony
Gadfly......

What is it that you really want to know from us?

The definition Father Heathen gave was spot on. It is what it is. He wasn't responsible for the definition. You seem to challenge what we perceive as logic. The same logical process we ALL use....you use (you use in the practical real world sense). There are plenty of doctors, scientist etc. who are theist but use the same methods we have been sharing with you.

When one catches a cold the only thing they can think about is getting rid of the cold. They go to the store walking the isles reading bottles of medicine hoping it will match their symptoms. They find one, read the ingredients and the directions and they buy it. From start to finish (the store shelf) that medicine went through the scientific process. The sick person used the scientific process selecting the proper medicine for his or her symptoms. We don't just let people create medicine then bring it to market. It goes through extensive testing and scrutany and complience checks before it can be sold.

The methods in starting a car, (Stick or manual) are well known because they have been tested and are known to work. The next time you are in a car use the scientific method and change it up by not stepping on the break and turning the key but try to put the car in gear. You will notice it won't work. The "logical" way to do this effectively is to do what is tried and true.

Here's an easier one. How can I find out what water is made of? Do I have faith and hope a god will reveal it to me? Do I pray and hope a spirit will guide me to the answers I seek? Can it be found in your bible? OR would you suggest I try the "logical" route.......?
 

GadFly

Active Member
Gadfly......
What is it that you really want to know from us?

The definition Father Heathen gave was spot on. It is what it is. He wasn't responsible for the definition. You seem to challenge what we perceive as logic. The same logical process we ALL use....you use (you use in the practical real world sense). There are plenty of doctors, scientist etc. who are theist but use the same methods we have been sharing with you.

When one catches a cold the only thing they can think about is getting rid of the cold. They go to the store walking the isles reading bottles of medicine hoping it will match their symptoms. They find one, read the ingredients and the directions and they buy it. From start to finish (the store shelf) that medicine went through the scientific process. The sick person used the scientific process selecting the proper medicine for his or her symptoms. We don't just let people create medicine then bring it to market. It goes through extensive testing and scrutany and complience checks before it can be sold.

The methods in starting a car, (Stick or manual) are well known because they have been tested and are known to work. The next time you are in a car use the scientific method and change it up by not stepping on the break and turning the key but try to put the car in gear. You will notice it won't work. The "logical" way to do this effectively is to do what is tried and true.

Here's an easier one. How can I find out what water is made of? Do I have faith and hope a god will reveal it to me? Do I pray and hope a spirit will guide me to the answers I seek? Can it be found in your bible? OR would you suggest I try the "logical" route.......?

You are welcome DreGod07 to join the conversation. You are even welcome to take sides with the two antagonist I have attracted. But please do not make insinuations about my person or call me names. I do not call names nor do I deliberately insult another person. In fact, it grieves me when somebody perceives I have been too harsh with them. I am first to apologize.

In keeping with my thread which ask the question, should believers avoid or fear atheist, I wanted some intense comments from both believers and atheist. It was my purpose from the beginning to see how atheist responded when the premises of their faith were intellectually challenged. The thread question was intellectually challenging by its very nature.

Look through the post of threads and count how many times questions are asked so that the believer or Christian is insulted by the nature of the question. What? Are Christians Just Stupid or Something? Crazy religous people. Is God evil because He causes death? Non-Christians ONLY Poll: Are Christian Apologetics Alive or Dead?

There are many other threads besides these today that implies insults to believers. I have noticed how good of sports the believers are as they respond to these insulting accusations of atheist and agnostics. Believers are called stupid, uneducated, hypocrites, self righteous, ignorant, chided for believing the Bible, etc. The first time they protest or challenge the atheist, he takes a fit in protest that anybody would challenge his beliefs. Some go so far as to order you off their threads. That is what they think of the freedom of speech. Like the communist, you have freedom of speech as long as you praise them. To hell with that.

What do you want from us, you ask. I want atheist to respond like gentlemen and ladies when their premises are challenged and not twist every thing we say. When you do spin things to fit your opinion, don't get so angry when it is pointed out that you put a spin on our opinion. Father Heathen reads well from a dictionary definitions of logic but he does not know the difference between Aristotelian logic and Hegelian logic in spite of his dictionary skills. Since the manner in which you join this conversation, it is fair for me to say that you appear to be ignorant of the differences between the two types of logic. Am I the only person on this thread that has studied logic in college or schools of higher learning. The two concepts of logic that I tell you of are not deep hidden information reserved only for a secrete few. I first learned about these two types of logic in high school.

When it is pointed out that communist and atheist use Hegelian logic. atheist go nuts. Why? Because they know that not only believers reject Hegelian logic but the entire Western Civilization has rejected this type of logic. In spite all your efforts to make me understand the logical process used in science, medicine, art and engineering, etc. you miss the point. None of these sciences or arts us the Hegelian method as the atheist and communist do.

It is your lack of knowledge about logic and your desire to make me look stupid that motivates you to join sides with these detractors and communist thinkers. You can call yourself a common sense religious person but I prefer that you use a little respect for the opinion of the 100's of millions of people who make up the Western Civilization, who do accept Aristotelean logic. No way do I use the same logic that they use. If you have no respect for me because I have pointed out errors in your personal philosophies, have respect for the standards this forum attempts to hold. Do I fear atheist? No! I am sure that most atheist are like myself. They seek truth. You fellows may be the exception to this rule.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
You are welcome DreGod07 to join the conversation. You are even welcome to take sides with the two antagonist I have attracted. But please do not make insinuations about my person or call me names. I do not call names nor do I deliberately insult another person. In fact, it grieves me when somebody perceives I have been too harsh with them. I am first to apologize.

Um...what name did he call you? And yes, you do apologize, and then go and do the same thing you apologized for in the next post.

In keeping with my thread which ask the question, should believers avoid or fear atheist, I wanted some intense comments from both believers and atheist. It was my purpose from the beginning to see how atheist responded when the premises of their faith were intellectually challenged. The thread question was intellectually challenging by its very nature.

Look through the post of threads and count how many times questions are asked so that the believer or Christian is insulted by the nature of the question. What? Are Christians Just Stupid or Something? Crazy religous people. Is God evil because He causes death? Non-Christians ONLY Poll: Are Christian Apologetics Alive or Dead?

There are many other threads besides these today that implies insults to believers. I have noticed how good of sports the believers are as they respond to these insulting accusations of atheist and agnostics. Believers are called stupid, uneducated, hypocrites, self righteous, ignorant, chided for believing the Bible, etc. The first time they protest or challenge the atheist, he takes a fit in protest that anybody would challenge his beliefs. Some go so far as to order you off their threads. That is what they think of the freedom of speech. Like the communist, you have freedom of speech as long as you praise them. To hell with that.

You do realize that 2 out of those 4 threads were started by Christians, right? Do you think there's a reason I singled you out, but have talked to everyone else on that same thread completely civilly? How many people exactly does it take telling you you're rude before you get the idea? I'm honestly curious.

What do you want from us, you ask. I want atheist to respond like gentlemen and ladies when their premises are challenged and not twist every thing we say. When you do spin things to fit your opinion, don't get so angry when it is pointed out that you put a spin on our opinion. Father Heathen reads well from a dictionary definitions of logic but he does not know the difference between Aristotelian logic and Hegelian logic in spite of his dictionary skills. Since the manner in which you join this conversation, it is fair for me to say that you appear to be ignorant of the differences between the two types of logic. Am I the only person on this thread that has studied logic in college or schools of higher learning. The two concepts of logic that I tell you of are not deep hidden information reserved only for a secrete few. I first learned about these two types of logic in high school.

Apparently you're the only one who didn't study in college or any other school, as you can't even grasp a simple dictionary definition.

When it is pointed out that communist and atheist use Hegelian logic. atheist go nuts. Why? Because they know that not only believers reject Hegelian logic but the entire Western Civilization has rejected this type of logic. In spite all your efforts to make me understand the logical process used in science, medicine, art and engineering, etc. you miss the point. None of these sciences or arts us the Hegelian method as the atheist and communist do.

Are you trying to insult atheists by grouping them in with communists? If so, I just wanted you to know that it's more of a compliment than an insult. And the dictionary definition of logic already given here is what everybody has been using to argue their point, everyone but you, that is. All you do is go on about how you're the only one using "real" logic.

It is your lack of knowledge about logic and your desire to make me look stupid that motivates you to join sides with these detractors and communist thinkers. You can call yourself a common sense religious person but I prefer that you use a little respect for the opinion of the 100's of millions of people who make up the Western Civilization, who do accept Aristotelean logic. No way do I use the same logic that they use. If you have no respect for me because I have pointed out errors in your personal philosophies, have respect for the standards this forum attempts to hold. Do I fear atheist? No! I am sure that most atheist are like myself. They seek truth. You fellows may be the exception to this rule.

Please refer back to your own comment about being a hypocrite. You have pointed out no errors in anyone's thinking but your own, and there is only one person in this thread not respecting the standards of this forum. I'll let you figure out which one it is.
 

Dirty Penguin

Master Of Ceremony
You are welcome DreGod07 to join the conversation. You are even welcome to take sides with the two antagonist I have attracted. But please do not make insinuations about my person or call me names. I do not call names nor do I deliberately insult another person. In fact, it grieves me when somebody perceives I have been too harsh with them. I am first to apologize.

Well, considering I never called you a name I'm at a loss here and have no idea what you're talking about.

In keeping with my thread which ask the question, should believers avoid or fear atheist, I wanted some intense comments from both believers and atheist. It was my purpose from the beginning to see how atheist responded when the premises of their faith were intellectually challenged. The thread question was intellectually challenging by its very nature.

Well how logical of an answer to that question do you want? That is why I asked what is it do you really want to know from us athiest. You seek more dialogue with us even though the most "logical" and shortest answer to that question you asked is (NO). It is one of the shortest words and it can be one of the most powerful words known. The answer to your question is NO...... If you seek more then we are left scratching our heads at your attempts to bait us into a never ending philosophical argument.....


Look through the post of threads and count how many times questions are asked so that the believer or Christian is insulted by the nature of the question. What? Are Christians Just Stupid or Something? Crazy religous people. Is God evil because He causes death? Non-Christians ONLY Poll: Are Christian Apologetics Alive or Dead?

There are many other threads besides these today that implies insults to believers. I have noticed how good of sports the believers are as they respond to these insulting accusations of atheist and agnostics. Believers are called stupid, uneducated, hypocrites, self righteous, ignorant, chided for believing the Bible, etc. The first time they protest or challenge the atheist, he takes a fit in protest that anybody would challenge his beliefs. Some go so far as to order you off their threads. That is what they think of the freedom of speech. Like the communist, you have freedom of speech as long as you praise them. To hell with that.

Some or most of these threads are started by theist. Christians to be exact. Heck man, they asked the question....we just supplied the opinion. Can't take the heat don't ask the question.....But if you seriously think this is a one sided deal where big bad athiest is putting the smack down on poor helpless theist you are mistaken. Theist hold their own in the face of disagreement. Ask any theist on this thread if they have been "converted" by an athiest and they will certainly tell you NO.....There's that word agian......If we have stepped out of line and vice versa the Staff, MODS and ADMINS do a great job to put us all back on track. You seem to be making these theist look weak and/or defenseless and it would appear to me that they are far from the picture you paint.

What do you want from us, you ask. I want atheist to respond like gentlemen and ladies when their premises are challenged and not twist every thing we say.

You asked a good question and honest answers were given. You accused Father Heathen of going on the attack but all he did was answer your question honestly and in a civil tone. So it appears he was answering your question gentlemenly but it was you who turned it into something it wasn't and this is where the attack began (refer to post 16).

When you do spin things to fit your opinion, don't get so angry when it is pointed out that you put a spin on our opinion. Father Heathen reads well from a dictionary definitions of logic but he does not know the difference between Aristotelian logic and Hegelian logic in spite of his dictionary skills. Since the manner in which you join this conversation, it is fair for me to say that you appear to be ignorant of the differences between the two types of logic.


See it's not the differences that I have a problem with. If I don't know I can certainly research it to gain a better understanding. but "LOGICALLY"........What's the pont? Knowing the difference does not help me to answer your origional question. Your origional question was a basic question that did not require deep thought to answer... that is why answering it with a (NO) should be satisfactory. If it doesn't then start a new thread that centers around these schools of thought.


Am I the only person on this thread that has studied logic in college or schools of higher learning. The two concepts of logic that I tell you of are not deep hidden information reserved only for a secrete few. I first learned about these two types of logic in high school.

And your point????? Because none of this was needed to answer such a basic question you originally asked.


It is your lack of knowledge about logic and your desire to make me look stupid that motivates you to join sides with these detractors and communist thinkers.

Are you serious. You believe that I have been trying to make you look stupid. If you believe this then you truly don't understand me or understood anything I said. What do you mean "join and take sides?" I've problaby spoken to the other members here who have responded to you more than I have ever to you. From my knowledge this is the fisrt time I have ever responded to you....I could be wrong though. Now becareful because it is now you who are doing the name calling.....


No way do I use the same logic that they use. If you have no respect for me because I have pointed out errors in your personal philosophies, have respect for the standards this forum attempts to hold. Do I fear atheist? No! I am sure that most atheist are like myself. They seek truth. You fellows may be the exception to this rule.

Then what was the point of this exercise if you feel most of us are like you seeking truth and (NO!) you don't fear athiest? We answered this for you but you seemed not to be satified with the respectful responses you received.....
 

Dirty Penguin

Master Of Ceremony
I like how not believing in god automatically determines what economic model you prefer. What about capitalist atheists? There are plenty of them.

Here is an interesting youtube video about atheist fools with flawed logic.

Man....that video was sooooo awsome. I had never seen that one until now. Thanks. I'll have to bookmark that one and look at it when I need to be reminded of the wonderful people in history....:)
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
I like how not believing in god automatically determines what economic model you prefer. What about capitalist atheists? There are plenty of them.

Here is an interesting youtube video about atheist fools with flawed logic.

So, I just watched it. Great video! I 'm glad I watchd it, so that I now know all of those "scientists who made the world a better place" are really just fools. I never would have known otherwise.
 

Reverend Rick

Frubal Whore
Premium Member
I believe we have personalised this thread way to much. If you discredit the poster, you win the debate?

I believe the true scientist would be agnostic. The atheist and the theist both utilise faith in their belief, which is unscientific. The lack of proof positive is not absolute proof now is it?

Many times I have heard Christians called, "flat earthers". I believe this is an interesting argument. Just for a moment lets consider this a valid example.

The Atheist of the times would employ their logic that because we cannot prove the world is round, it therefore must be flat. Their belief that the world was flat was flawed. An agnostic would have said, I don't know for sure the world is flat, but will be glad to see evidence to the contrary and adjust my thoughts accordingly.

One thing is for certain. Either the Christian or the Atheist is wrong. For the time being, neither can provide proof positive that either side is right.

Being a Christian, that is as open minded a comment as I can make sticking to absolute logic and reason. I doubt any Atheists will post on here that there is a chance they might be wrong about this.

The difference between Christians and Atheists is, one is going to be more upset about this if they are wrong than the other.
 
Top