Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, in this context it seems to mean the full day, however, I believe that it doesn't 'have' to mean the full day, when night is also specified. Whether it means the full day or not, depends on the verse/s/.From Genesis
8 And God called the expanse Heaven, and it was evening, and it was morning, a second day.
Isaiah 56:6-7 refers to those who convert to Judaism. Those who don't convert have no obligation to observe the Sabbath.Dear metis,
Isaiah 56:6 may disagree with your point of view. "Also the foreigners who joint themselves to the Lord, To minister to Him and to love the name of the Lord, To be His servants, every one who keeps from profaning the Sabbath, and holds fast My covenant; Even those I will bring to My holy Mountain".
This apart from the fact that the tribe of Israel, which according to Joel 3:2 is "scattered among the nations".
As for the "Christians", the Roman emperor who established the Roman church, decreed that the "day of the sun" be the "day of rest". (March 7, 321 AD) Those who keep the 10 Commandments have a mark on their hand and forehead, those who keep the decrees of the king of Rome, have his mark on their hands and forehead. (Deut 6:8 & Rev 13)
Isn't it arguable that Christians should be keeping Shabbat since they claim to follow the ten commandments? Certainly Jesus and the disciples kept it, seeing as they were Jews. What argument can really be brought forward that Christians shouldn't be keeping it, and do the gospels anywhere explicitly suggest Jesus wouldn't want his followers to?
Dear metis,
Isaiah 56:6 may disagree with your point of view. "Also the foreigners who joint themselves to the Lord, To minister to Him and to love the name of the Lord, To be His servants, every one who keeps from profaning the Sabbath, and holds fast My covenant; Even those I will bring to My holy Mountain".
This apart from the fact that the tribe of Israel, which according to Joel 3:2 is "scattered among the nations".
But no matter how one may try and look at it, the reality is that no Christian group today observes the Sabbath as directed by Torah, and it's quite clear in the gospels that the early church began to walk away from full Torah observance.
Where did you get that very few Jews agree on how to interpret Sabbath as directed by Torah?And it may be safe to say very few Jews agree on how to interpret Sabbath as directed by Torah.
And it is safe to say first century Judaism was so diverse it did not agree on full Torah observance either.
Where did you get that very few Jews agree on how to interpret Sabbath as directed by Torah?
Gentles made up a small fraction at first in Israel, so full recognition of the Sabbath by all made sense, especially because there'a always going to be interactions between gentiles and Jews in small communities. You have to remember that the Sabbath Laws involve quite a few prohibitions.
But no matter how one may try and look at it, the reality is that no Christian group today observes the Sabbath as directed by Torah, and it's quite clear in the gospels that the early church began to walk away from full Torah observance.
Isaiah 56:6-7 refers to those who convert to Judaism. Those who don't convert have no obligation to observe the Sabbath.
Joel 4:2 is about the messianic days when the nations are punished for the exiles imposed on the nation of Israel.
Christians do keep the sabbath but they keep it on a Sunday.
I have never had a problem with that.
The actual day of the week is hardly of any importance.
How they keep the Sabbath is down to their own church, and not laid down in a covenant. Christians have no formal covenant with God.
I agree, the Sabbath is the Sabbath, Sunday is not the Sabbath and it can never be the Sabbath, the Seventh Day Adventist that I use to belong to, were one of the only churches that kept the Sabbath.Terrywoodenpic,
re: "Christians do keep the sabbath but they keep it on a Sunday."
If by Sunday you mean the first day of the week then no one is keeping it on that day. One of the requirements for keeping the Sabbath is to keep it on the seventh day of the week.
But it speaks of God's nation "Israel" straight through the book (most recently in chapter 55. To attach to the lord by following his laws connects one to "his people" (56:3). So we are talking about those who converted to Judaism.Dear rose,
Isaiah 56:6-7 refers to "those who joint themselves to the lord". Judaism is not the lord.
which is why I said it refers to the future messianic days.Joel 3:1-2 is about "when I restore the fortunes of Judah and Jerusalem" and then gather the nations who have scattered "My inheritance, Israel, ...among the nations". The northern 10 tribes, known as Israel, are still scattered among the nations. The Jews basically represent Judah, Benjamin, and the Levites. The stick of Ephraim, which represents Israel, has not been reunited with the stick of Judah. (Ex 37:19) And king David does not rule over the combined sticks at this time (Ex 37:24)
I agree, the Sabbath is the Sabbath, Sunday is not the Sabbath and it can never be the Sabbath, the Seventh Day Adventist that I use to belong to, were one of the only churches that kept the Sabbath.
But it speaks of God's nation "Israel" straight through the book (most recently in chapter 55. To attach to the lord by following his laws connects one to "his people" (56:3). So we are talking about those who converted to Judaism.
which is why I said it refers to the future messianic days.
Neither the theocratic Judah nor the temple in Jerusalem has been restored. Therefore, they will happen in the future. Not the now. The fact that the 10 tribes of Israel are still scattered means that the ingathering will happen in the future. The "nation" of Israel does not include any tribes as it is a geopolitical construct. The current form of Judaism is composed of descendants of (primarily) those tribes you list. Your interpretation of Hosea is delightful but totally irrelevant to the Jewish understanding of Judaism and the law God gave to the Jews. I try my best not to tell Russians what Russian law means. I'm not Russian.Dear rose,
The restoration of Judah and Jerusalem is not "future". It is in the here and now. The fact that "Israel" is scattered among the nations is not "future", but the here and now. Israel is not Judah, whereas Judah has been part of Israel. The "nation" of Israel is with respect to the edict of 1948, which actually only includes Judah, Benjamin, the Levites, with a small smattering of other tribes. Judah and Israel have been accurately described by God as harlots. That applies to past, and present. It is not until they are struck down that they will return to God. That refers to after the nations who surround Jerusalem capture the city, and the "lord" intervenes. The revival of Israel and Judah will not occur until after 2 days, or 2000 years "after I go away" (Hosea 5:14), according to Hosea 6:2.