But the whole question is whether it is morally loaded or not in the first place. Should Feminism involve encouraging women to do things which cause men to regard them as sex objects or not? Please explain why you viewed the description as "morally loaded" in the first place.
Or should Feminism be about somehow persuading men to not regard women who do such to be regarded as sex objects, and if so, how?
It struck me as morally loaded due to the word choices which can be taken commonly as entailing immorality of the act. There is a difference between saying that it can or does contribute to women being viewed as sexual objects and between using words that have common connotations such as 'promiscuous'.
In my view, there's nothing inherently wrong about stripping, in any moral sense. I also don't think that it's inherently damaging, nor necessitating of sexually objectifying women. It could be, and i would assume that it is in some contexts, but i don't think that this necessarily goes with the territory.
So i would assume that a feminist would support a woman's choice in working as a stripper, as a general idea. Whether it's for making some cash temporarily, or because it's seen as a career. To me it's just another form of erotic art, at least ideally.
Due to some of the dangers such jobs may have in some contexts, i can also see how a feminist would not particularly
encourage others to seek that as a career, and could even see why there might be some reservations based
only on genuine caring for any possible damage that might occur, rather than some extension to the idea of ****-shaming.
