Skwim
Veteran Member
And what do you think our legislatures are for?but laws are passed by judges and panels that are influenced by public opinion and consensus.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And what do you think our legislatures are for?but laws are passed by judges and panels that are influenced by public opinion and consensus.
Tiberius - no, I am talking about subliminal psychological coercion / manipulation.
Like , please sleep with Uncle bob to keep the family happy.
that kind of thing - the manipulation could be an undercurrent within the family that would be very hard to detect by an outsider.
also subjective reasoning by the lawmakers will inevitably play some part.
Morality is subjective after all - impossible to avoid and no reason why it should be either.
Oh, alright, just because I like jerking your chain...
Do you even know what a logical fallacy is? Here you seem to be using it as a synonym for "argument", but it doesn't actually work like that.
Prove it.
Only after several generations, so I've heard. If you want I'll try to find a source, but if a brother and sister have a child together, that child won't have three arms or have mental problems or anything. It takes several generations for that.
What about atheists?
And where did Cain and Abel's wives come from? Or did they do it with Eve? And what about Noah's family? There weren't enough people on the ark to avoid having sex with close family members.
If I can find an instance of incest in the animal kingdom, will you drop that argument?
So is climbing into a metal tube and flying through the sky at the speed of sound, yet people do that. And I assume you don't have a problem with it.
Many more? Then I assume you won't have a problem naming ten more issues about the harm/disadvantages of incest that you haven't already mentioned.
lol, only you could acknowledge something as your own subjective opinion and then turn around and present it as objective fact in the same sentence. It's not something to be proud of.
So like brothers and sisters, not cousins?
I'll believe it when I see it...
If someone asks Sally to have sex with uncle Bob to keep the family happy, and Sally does it in order to keep the family happy but she doesn't want to do it, then it is rape.
The fact that she was not held down while it happened is irrelevant. The fact remains that Sally did not want to do it. She had sex with someone that she did not want to have sex with. it is rape.
That is the only issue that is relevant. Unless Sally wants to do it, it is rape.
?
If you don't want it, you don't want it. Being pressured to do something you don't want to is considered coercion, which means it's not consensual, which means could be considered rape.this is like saying if you agree to have sex with someone to keep them happy but don't really want it then it is rape - that's nonsense.
- how did you come to this conclusion?
this is like saying if you agree to have sex with someone to keep them happy but don't really want it then it is rape - that's nonsense.
If I keep my girlfriend happy when I'm not in the mood is is she raping me?
Explain
we are talking about subliminal psychological pressure here of the most indirect kind.
Almost unnoticeable yet it is there.
This is not rape.
The effects of subliminal messaging seem to be very weak at best. A few studies show it has an effect, but most of them show that it has very little effect overall.we are talking about subliminal psychological pressure here of the most indirect kind.
It doesn't matter. If it is there, then it is rape.
The effects of subliminal messaging seem to be very weak at best. A few studies show it has an effect, but most of them show that it has very little effect overall.
No, coercion is not freely given consent and it is rape.yes, but none of those situations are rape though if the woman agreed to have sex.
this is what I was getting at.
if there is a choice then it is not rape (although this is leading off topic)
No, actually the laws would cover it, they're just rarely used to because it's difficult to prove and testifying tends to be incredibly traumatic to the victim. Primarily due to the blame that people place on the victim, but also for reliving a traumatic experience. This is something that doesn't change in incest cases.not legal rape though surely.
I mean how about if you sleep with a prostitute who only does it for the money - surely that is not rape.
If you are talking about a kind of moral rape then please say so and we can discuss that