I’m really curious about this now, to see where my agreement with people promoting and defending Baha’i beliefs breaks down. I think we agree that we want to follow Bahá’u’lláh, and that Baha’i scriptures are an indispensable part of what is needed for the best possibilities to happen for all people everywhere, in some distant future. There might be some agreement between us, maybe, in some virtues that they might be trying to practice.
We seem to me to be poles apart in our thinking about what Bahá’u’lláh is aiming for, how it might happen, and what He says we can do to help. Now that I think about it, I see that as a good thing, diversity in our ways of thinking. So what’s my problem? Party it’s a personal problem in the way it affects my communication with people who think I’m one of them. I also have a problem with their beliefs, and the ways that they’re promoting them, repelling people away from Bahá’u’lláh and the community of His followers. Also, I think that we could do a lot more good in Internet discussions if they would look for ideas in what the House of Justice is promoting, and we could be working on some goals and plans together.
So between our agreement to follow Bahá’u’lláh, and our disagreement about following the House of Justice, about thoughtfulness and consideration for other people’s enjoyment and what they’re trying to do in the forums, about working together to resolve conflicts of interest, and about having some goals and plans to work on together in Internet discussions, where does our agreement break down?