Why you can trust socialism.
Marx’s philosophy and the *necessity* of violent politics – Stephen Hicks, Ph.D.
Marx’s philosophy and the *necessity* of violent politics – Stephen Hicks, Ph.D.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We don't.So do you think communist mask themselves as socialist on purpose
Che was no racist.Che Guevara - Wikipedia a well known communist revolutionary was also homophobe, racist, and murderer.
Why not? You sure seem happy to forget the far right terrorists that do so.Let's not forget those far left terrorist that torture/kill innocent families attending church.
Communist terrorism - Wikipedia
Sure I do. I like Andrew Yang.
Doesn't matter what your local definition is. This is the internet. Only the internet definiton matters.
So why do you think communist pretend to be socialist? Is it just to put a pretty face on a terrible idea?
The word is used a lot lately here in the U.S. Many of news media, politicians, and a large number of today's youth proudly claim to be socialist. But what is socialism? Some would have you believe it's about taking care of others that need help. Sounds nice doesn't it?
Let's see what Google has to say. Ahem Ok Google! What is the definition of socialist?
View attachment 28958
Very interesting. Communist comes up immediately. Now hold on? We all know communism starved millions to death in the U.S.S.R. Soviet famine of 1932–33 - Wikipedia
Che Guevara - Wikipedia a well known communist revolutionary was also homophobe, racist, and murderer. Socialist Hero Che Guevara: Racist, Homophobe & Mass Murderer
So what exactly is so enticing to these young people who claim they only want to help people? I see nothing but starvation, deaths and oppression from communism in the last 100 years.
So what do you think?
You don't like dictionary definitions either! =O}It takes a real genius to realize that google definitions are full of shxt!!
I would have gone more with Chairman Mao.If you think that Stalin was a socialist then you need to look up the internet definition for 'daft'.
Democratic socialism, explained by a democratic socialistIt takes a real genius to realize that socialism has multiple meanings of which communism is only one!!
Ooh, they hate it when that gets pointed out, it provokes the most ridiculous contortions to try to argue against. Let's watch! *popcorn*jesus was a communist.
Matthew 19:21
Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sellthat thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.
Mark 10:21
Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.
Luke 18:22
Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me.
OK.........I would have gone more with Chairman Mao.
That takes care of the left, but what about the right?OK.........
Truth is, extreme right and extreme left are both bloody dangerous.
Hitler and Mussolini or Stalin and Mao?
INB4 "Hitler wasn't rightwing, NAZI has the world 'socialism' in it!"OK.........
Truth is, extreme right and extreme left are both bloody dangerous.
Hitler and Mussolini or Stalin and Mao?
Oh I love it!That takes care of the left, but what about the right?
Called itOh I love it!
You think that Nazis were communists?
Wow...........
What's INB4?INB4 "Hitler wasn't rightwing, NAZI has the world 'socialism' in it!"
INB4= In before.What's INB4?
Do folks think that Hitler was a socialist? Titles are often lies, of course.
Nazi Elitism could never have been true socialism. But then, nor was Stalin's world either.
Ah!INB4= In before.
People claim Hitler was a socialist, because it's a lot easier having Hitler on the other guy's side than your side. Of course, any semi competent student of history know Hitler specifically, and the NAZIs generally, were in no way socialist, but you know how it is. Who cares about things like facts and history when there are tribal agendas to push?
Oh I don't disagree. It's clear however the extremes are definitely leaning incrementally further left into socialists territory and arguably beyond that.OK.........
Truth is, extreme right and extreme left are both bloody dangerous.
Hitler and Mussolini or Stalin and Mao?