Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
i wanted to distinguish for clarity between the twoWhy are you introducing no thing? I never mentioned no thing
energy is not a finite thing. a planck constant is a quantum, slice of the wave. like a quantity of apples are a sample of all apples ever produced.The physical mind that produces these infinite thoughts is bound to the laws of physics and thus is a finite thing. Thus the infinite in depth thoughts are also finite.
All that exists is subject to entropy.
energy is not a finite thing. a planck constant is a quantum, slice of the wave. like a quantity of apples are a sample of all apples ever produced.
unfortunately entropy occurs when something is being created at a lower/higher density than the energy density/vibration being used. so its a change in vibration that creates the distortion from the original vibration to a higher/lower vibration
in physics they are called standing waves
Yet the mind that produces these thoughts is organic, and an AI needs a power source. Neither is infinitely sustainable.
everyone i meet. we're like actors in a william shakespeare play. some just don't know they played a different character in another time and place.matter and energy are interchangeable. I know that but I don't know any immortals do you?
i wanted to distinguish for clarity between the two
Alternatively, imagine absolute nothing, no dimensions, no photons, absolutely nothing. Much more difficult to comprehend.
It is not difficult to understand, it is the way it is explained . There is many types of nothing, each nothing explainable in a different way .
What you are talking about has dimensions, but there is nothing to define those dimensions.
Let me explain absolute nothing to you
1) Look at any object
2)Remove in your mind all other objects around you .
You should see this in your mind
View attachment 21730
Now remove you and the object and you should see this
View attachment 21731
Ok, so now remove all the Quantum soup from the picture , you will still see the same picture.
Now if you can understand the picture is not dark or light, you can now see what nothingness looks like.
looks like a black square to me.
dark or light; if there is no contrast there is no definition. its like asking a blind person; if they dream in color, or see things? how can they answer; if they have never had an ocular sense.It will to most, look between the distant stars , what do you see?
Is it dark?
Is it light?
Does it look dark but there is light?
dark or light; if there is no contrast there is no definition. its like asking a blind person; if they dream in color, or see things? how can they answer; if they have never had an ocular sense.
Where would one house "something" if there is no emptiness ("nothing"-ness) to place it?You wrote "Both "something" and "nothing" are created by G-d, "
They are contradictory
Nothing is the absence of something.
It is not difficult to understand, it is the way it is explained . There is many types of nothing, each nothing explainable in a different way .
What you are talking about has dimensions, but there is nothing to define those dimensions.
Let me explain absolute nothing to you
1) Look at any object
2)Remove in your mind all other objects around you .
You should see this in your mind
View attachment 21730
Now remove you and the object and you should see this
View attachment 21731
Ok, so now remove all the Quantum soup from the picture , you will still see the same picture.
Now if you can understand the picture is not dark or light, you can now see what nothingness looks like.
You obviously dont know what im talking about, your very first paragraph shows that, and the rest doesn't improve either
Where would one house "something" if there is no emptiness ("nothing"-ness) to place it?
Regards
I know very well that nothing has a few meanings. Nothing as in a geometrical point you are talking about, the boring mathematical nothing.
Then why define it with your personal interpretation while trying to decry my post?
And since when has a dimensionless ??? Been geometrical?
Perhaps you do not fully understand what a dimension is ?
A dimension is an imaginary line depicting a length of space.
An unknown volume of space has 0 dimensions. Relatively nothingness.