• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Tampon Tim

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
There is no more radical agenda in America than Trump's. Trump apologists shouldn't use the word radical to refer to anything else.

Same answer. People who promote Trump shouldn't accuse anyone or anything else of being evil.

Trump supporters also shouldn't call anything anti-democratic, nor anything a coup, just as Trump should not be calling anybody stupid or crooked.
How sad and predictable. Your Trump Derangement Syndrome is truly massive. I declare, someone could write "the sky is blue" and you would post "But Trump..." Get a new tune one trick pony.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
MAGA bull****. It's another set of "swift boat" lies from the party of lying. Trump and Vance are puppets of Putin and I would not be surprised to find Putin is involved in the US election because winning his war of aggression in Europe depends on having appeasers run the US.

Nope. It is a fact. Walz never served in any combat. He quit after getting orders to Iraq so he wouldn't have to go. He is a poseur.

LOL I do like your meltdown, though. Tee hee. I will relish it for days. Thanks.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
Oligarchs have much too much power - true. SCOTUS made it worse by saying money is speech which increased their power. This is a world-wide problem if you pay attention to what goes on in many nations. Solving it is needed.

And I agree that the Democrats are also dependent on their money. But they at least are not as bad as Republicans. And history proves that the deficit grows more slowly when they're in power so there's at least that as well.
Citizens United case at SCOTUS decided that corporations were people and that corporate donations were covered under Free Speech.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
How sad and predictable..... Get a new tune one trick pony.
200.gif
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Citizens United case at SCOTUS decided that corporations were people....
That's inaccurate. It decided that among the
rights that corporations share with people
(eg, to sue in court), speech is one too.
This is a centuries old concept.
The DNC & RNC are both corporations.
Imagine denying those political parties
the right to speech.
 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
For those that want to push radical trans agendas nothing.
What exactly is this radical trans agenda. As far as I can tell it involves actually acknowledging that trans people exist. But I fail to see how that is radical
For those that think schools and government shouldn't be in the business of promoting sex changes for children,
No schools are.

Why are you dishonestly saying that schools are?

it is an issue. Nor was this done in a vacuum. Gov. Walz has also other things to promote the state as a "trans sanctuary". For example signing an executive order that shields patients, parents and providers from punishment by other states for seeking and delivering such care.


Let's see....The order says, among other things that state agencies to study the effectiveness of the care and investigate any health organization that denies appropriate and approved medical care.. The order also prohibited Minnesota from cooperating in any investigation by a state that aimed to prosecute parents from seeking appropriate care for their child.

What a horrible man!

Which allows people to bring children from other states, against the wishes of parents, and get the children's genitals surgically altered without any recourse for the parents.
This is just a horrible lie. Why are you presenting this filth as fact?
 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
I think you may be a little confused. "Judge ye not, lest ye be judged" is a Christian New Testament-ism. I am not a Christian and not bound by that. More importantly giving succor to people that want to lop off the gonads of little boys or eviscerate the mammaries of little girls isn't showing love. Quite the opposite, it promotes evil.
and doesn't lying about lopping off things promote evil?
 

Spice

StewardshipPeaceIntergityCommunityEquality
Nope. It is a fact. Walz never served in any combat. He quit after getting orders to Iraq so he wouldn't have to go. He is a poseur.

LOL I do like your meltdown, though. Tee hee. I will relish it for days. Thanks.
Still a big difference in serving 24 years vs. 4 years. And he retired to go into politics which he has been involved in ever since - successfully. 2 terms Congress, 2 terms Governor.

Now, for Vance, he was a combat correspondent. I'll not try to take anything from him, but he wanted to write....that's been his success. His business venture failed.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
Nope. It is a fact. Walz never served in any combat. He quit after getting orders to Iraq so he wouldn't have to go. He is a poseur.

LOL I do like your meltdown, though. Tee hee. I will relish it for days. Thanks.
False. Walz submitted his retirement paperwork prior to his retirement in May 2005.

His unit was alerted for deployment in July 2005.

In September 2005 they began preparing for deployment.

The unit was deployed in March 2006.

 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Harris will do nothing to enact any of these reforms. Just as Biden did nothing to enact any of these reforms in his long career as an empty suit in the Senate. The whole Democratic Party are career politicians feeding at corporate money troth and at the taxpayer’s expense. They aren’t going to do a thing to rock the profit boat for their corporate masters.

BUT, they also aren’t out to burn the whole country to the ground just to keep their own sorry butts or of jail.
So making Minnesota a sanctuary state for child sex change procedures or putting tampons in boys bathrooms, or signing a bill to not give life saving medical attention to a live aborted baby and to stop reporting requirements for live births after an abortion are not progressive actual changes to society?
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
So making Minnesota a sanctuary state for child sex change procedures or putting tampons in boys bathrooms, or signing a bill to not give life saving medical attention to a live aborted baby and to stop reporting requirements for live births after an abortion are not progressive actual changes to society?

2023 Minnesota Statute​

145.423 RECOGNITION OF INFANT WHO IS BORN ALIVE.​

Subdivision 1.Recognition; care.​


An infant who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to care for the infant who is born alive.

 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member

2023 Minnesota Statute​

145.423 RECOGNITION OF INFANT WHO IS BORN ALIVE.​

Subdivision 1.Recognition; care.​


An infant who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to care for the infant who is born alive.

Yes in 2022 the law read "preserve the life and health of the born alive infant" to "care for the infant that is born alive" See below and link.

Sec. 56.​

Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 145.423, subdivision 1, is amended to read:​

Subdivision 1.​


Recognition; medical care.​


A born alive An infant as a result of an abortion who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant care for the infant who is born alive.


Two born alive babies were given comfort care not care to preserve their life. From the MN Born Alive Infants Protection Act Report. This is post birth abortion and Walz is a POS for signing these changes. It changed Medical Care to just Care.
 

Spice

StewardshipPeaceIntergityCommunityEquality
Yes in 2022 the law read "preserve the life and health of the born alive infant" to "care for the infant that is born alive" See below and link.

Sec. 56.​

Minnesota Statutes 2022, section 145.423, subdivision 1, is amended to read:​

Subdivision 1.​


Recognition; medical care.​


A born alive An infant as a result of an abortion who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant care for the infant who is born alive.


Two born alive babies were given comfort care not care to preserve their life. From the MN Born Alive Infants Protection Act Report. This is post birth abortion and Walz is a POS for signing these changes. It changed Medical Care to just Care.
You don't have much if any experience in the possible conditions an infant can be born alive in, do you? Ignorance (not meant in an rude sense) is bliss. :sleepy:
 

Spice

StewardshipPeaceIntergityCommunityEquality
Then tell me. And why change that language from medical care to just care?
Just one example I've been witness to.
An infant that had a condition that caused a blister as a third degree burn just from being touched. By the time she finally died, she had no skin. Unfortunately, she lived for weeks. It's palliative care, which "can" be medical, or not.
 
Top