I had a teacher who used to wing erarers. I'm sure if he were armed I probably could have sustained at least a flesh wound.
Did you ever throw the eraser back at him?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I had a teacher who used to wing erarers. I'm sure if he were armed I probably could have sustained at least a flesh wound.
I'd stress scenario re-enactment.Depends on their experience and what training they have gone through
If you are talking about a neophyte (never handled a firearm) I would say stating with about a day of classroom instruction in the basics, followed by a day of classroom instruction in safety, then followed by at least 200 rounds at a range in 1-2 days (depending on class size...shouldn't be more than 25 IMO), then a year or more of range time with a qualified instruction consisting of at least 2000 rounds. Then a competency test by oral, written, and live fire.
A person experienced with a firearm, IMO, a refresher in firearm safety, and a competency test by oral, written and live fire.
There should be communication systems in place for cops & school staffWell let me put it this way. I wouldn't be running through the halls waving a firearm, that's a good way to get shot.
So, depending on the situation I would feel safe as long as I knew that the police were trained beyond the basics and that the staff were also.
No, but I got pretty dusty a few times.Did you ever throw the eraser back at him?
Teacher accidentally fires gun in classroom, students injured
I have reservations for arming teachers and here is a case that is related. This teacher was negligent but was trained in firearms:
I just begs the never ending question: do we want teachers, who were hired to teach, to be armed with guns in a school? Thoughts?
Stop ruining a good story with facts. Sheesh!When I first read the title by the news media, I go into "Something does't quite look right". How can a teacher fire a gun? With today's twisting of news, and the issue about "teachers with guns" -- I wondered if it was slightly adjusted so I researched it some:
Teacher, reserve officer, accidentally fires gun at Calif. school
First, I will agree that teaching about guns in a classroom isn't quite the correct setting BUT
It wasn't a simple "teacher" but rather a reserve officer.
So I ask:
This is really hurting the trustworthiness of the newsmeda.
- Why did the title of the news feed fail to mention that?
- Was there an motive because of personal preference by the news media?
Which highlights another point, do you think we can trust teachers with this responsibility?
There should be, for sure. I think @Revoltingest hits a very big potential problem which is adequate training. If guns become a part of a teachers carry, we need to be very selective on who gets that privilege on school property.
When I taught I kept a gun in my desk drawer at all times ... just behind the stapler. Those little _______ s wouldn't do their homework, and needed extra motivation. It worked well in Phys-Ed too. Kids actually ran during warm-up. One tree hugging parent came onto complain so I shot her. She never complained again.
More guns will fix this!Teacher accidentally fires gun in classroom, students injured
I have reservations for arming teachers and here is a case that is related. This teacher was negligent but was trained in firearms:
I just begs the never ending question: do we want teachers, who were hired to teach, to be armed with guns in a school? Thoughts?
And who pays for the training and maintenence of competencies?This seems to be the theme we all seem to find agreement on. Based on your experience, if a teacher who had no previous training and wanted to participate, how long would it take? Assuming they can demonstrate basic competencies at a reasonable rate.
Edit: @David1967 feel free to chime in as well.
That would fall on tax payers, that is my guess.And who pays for the training and maintenence of competencies?
Do you think training and repeated exposure will decrease the chances of accidents occurring?Training has nothing to do with it...Accidental shootings happen when teachers were walking
Some might, others might not.Do teachers even want it?
I'm an ex teacher. I wouldn't.
There's just something contradicting with teachers being peace enforcers at the same time.
I haven't found the right language to describe this but seeing this profession evolve to that similar to that of a police or military just doesn't seem right. Not to mention this is being done in an environment where toddlers, kids and teenagers frequent.
Has our culture changed so much, that schools are basically some urban war zone now?
Just to entertain this idea of arming the teachers falls right into the NRA's philosophies.
So instead of changing the environment, the environment forces the solution of adding more guns to the environment.
The problem is that people that shouldn't own guns are owning guns. That is the root issue. Fix that instead of potentially letting more people own guns that shouldn't own guns.
would you support a pay raise for them?Yes, as long as they are properly trained