Fallen Prophet
Well-Known Member
I don't think the law should be changed because there are men out there who will abuse it.I certainly don't agree. I use the men's room, obviously. Lol.
I don't think you are going to have any issues.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't think the law should be changed because there are men out there who will abuse it.I certainly don't agree. I use the men's room, obviously. Lol.
I am advocating that the law not be changed because it helps mitigate the risk of bad people taking advantage.For your information, Frank does not agree with that position. You're advocating he use the women's restroom. But he's rather quite masculine and manly. Could you imagine the scene if a bearded man goes in the women's restroom to use it?
And there is also the fact other countries of the world do have more private stalls and don't segregate restrooms based on sex or gender. They are doing just fine.
No it doesn't. As has been pointed out I don't know how many times now that lots of places don't segregate the restrooms and they are just fine.I am advocating that the law not be changed because it helps mitigate the risk of bad people taking advantage.
This ideology has already proven to be a slippery slope.
Transgender activists have been equating gender with biological sex since the inception of the current definition of "gender".
Any claim that there are more than two genders or biological sexes - that gender is disconnected from biological sex - or that anyone can change either - is what leads us to chaos and anarchy.
If I am understanding what you said correctly - that is irrelevant.The body and brain genderize at different times during gestation, and sometimes things don't end up changing. And sometimes things don't jive when the fetus physically changes from female to male. They can't help that.
I understand that you live in California - but for the majority of the country - men are not allowed to use women's restrooms and vice versa.No it doesn't. As has been pointed out I don't know how many times now that lots of places don't segregate the restrooms and they are just fine.
You're also advocating something that increases the risks to us. Like Frank. He looks and acts very much like a man. He would be viewed as a burly, bearded man who is in the wrong place. And no laws are being changed. Frank, a guy, who's more manly and masculine than many cis males, belongs in the men's restroom because he's a man. Changing the law would be requiring this man to use the women's restroom.
If I am understanding what you said correctly - that is irrelevant.
There are still only the two genders and biological sexes, and they cannot be changed.
Ok, yet you tell me you'd harass me for using the women's restroom. You say it's ok now even though I have used the same "presenting as" argument before and you said it can't happen because of "bad people."A line has to be drawn somewhere and I have no doubt that @Saint Frankenstein will have no issues using the men's restroom - because he presents as a male and he is not a pervert looking to abuse anyone.
That line is drawn at mind your own damn business.A line has to be drawn somewhere and changing the laws will allow bad people to take advantage.
People are free to behave and identify as they want - but they cannot claim that there are more than two genders or biological sexes or that anyone can change them.I don't get all of the different gender types people talk about, but I think when attributes become very narrow, it causes those who don't perfectly fit in to find another name for their type. If people were more accepting of differences, people would be happy being female or male, IMO. Those who are different are judged, bullied and made fun of, so I am not surprised that they want to find their own place.
I don't recall ever saying that. Can you quote me?Ok, yet you tell me you'd harass me for using the women's restroom.
I am not saying that I think that it is "ok" - only that I don't think @Saint Frankenstein will have any issue.You say it's ok now even though I have used the same "presenting as" argument before and you said it can't happen because of "bad people."
Correct - and you believe that means we should just disband all law?Bad people do bad things regardless.
No one is being banned from using public restrooms.Are we going to ban and censor the world because bad people do bad things?
But we do check IDs - to make sure that people are old enough to drink before allowing them to buy alcohol.Of course not. Like bad people selling alcohol to minors. It would be dumb to ban alcohol because of that.
No - I have been saying, "Don't change the law."And you keep saying "change the law," but you acknowledge it's ok for Frank to use the men's restroom although by your reasoning he should be in the women's restroom because he was born female.
Tell that to the people who have been raped in public restrooms.That line is drawn at mind your own damn business.
Stopping me from using the restroom, or hindering me from going there, because you're scared of pervy men, is harassment.How would I be able to "harass" you for using the women's restroom when I am never going to be in a women's restroom - because I am a man?
He would indeed have a very big problem using the ladies restroom. He's not a lady, but your "biology first" rubbish would put this masculine man in the ladies room.I am not saying that I think that it is "ok" - only that I don't think @Saint Frankenstein will have any issue.
That was a miserable failure. Most people don't have problems with alcohol and it actually has some health benefits when consumed in moderation.I personally see no use for alcohol - and actually believe it does nothing but harm - so I wouldn't mind seeing it disappear.
You did with Frank.No - I have been saying, "Don't change the law."
And I never said that I thought that it was "ok" for any woman to use the men's restroom.
Do you think your dumb laws and ideas are going to stop them? Very few rapes happen in a bathroom anyways. And the attacker is often someone the victim knows.Tell that to the people who have been raped in public restrooms.
You want to give potential rapists a "leg up".
You would ban people because Frank doesn't belong in the women's restroom just as I don't belong in the men's. Seriously. I sometimes got weird looks in them when I still used them.No one is being banned from using public restrooms.
One of my friends who is a trans woman said she would get messed with in the men's room, because she was always very girly looking. No one messes with me in the men's room, even before I was on testosterone.You would ban people because Frank doesn't belong in the women's restroom just as I don't belong in the men's. Seriously. I sometimes got weird looks in them when I still used them.
I haven't been messed with, just odd, weird, puzzled looks trying to figure out if I belong there or not.One of my friends who is a trans woman said she would get messed with in the men's room, because she was always very girly looking. No one messes with me in the men's room, even before I was on testosterone.
Why did you ignore my first sentence?Stopping me from using the restroom, or hindering me from going there, because you're scared of pervy men, is harassment.
How? There are no "sex" detectors or "sex IDs" needed.He would indeed have a very big problem using the ladies restroom. He's not a lady, but your "biology first" rubbish would put this masculine man in the ladies room.
I didn't say "prohibit" - I said "disappear".That was a miserable failure.
Any "health benefit" that can be gained from alcohol could be gained in even greater quantity and quality from other sources.Most people don't have problems with alcohol and it actually has some health benefits when consumed in moderation.
You say that now - but I bet you're one of the first to say that we should ban all guns because of "bad people".And it still stands we can't ban the world because of "bad people." That just gives a big middle finger to those who aren't doing wrong.
Nope - I simply said that I don't think he'd have an issue.You did with Frank.
Here you are arguing that we should just get rid of all laws again.Do you think your dumb laws and ideas are going to stop them?
So?Very few rapes happen in a bathroom anyways.
All the more reason to have the law in place.And the attacker is often someone the victim knows.
"Typical" rape?Now you show us your ignorance of the typical rape.
No one ever brought up clubs or bars before - the issue has been public restrooms - so why would I discuss them?Ever hear of Rohypnol? They don't need a bathroom and I haven't heard you attack clubs and bars because of bad people.
And for the I don't know how many times it is legal for me to use the women's restroom in Indiana. You didn't use the word harassment, but trying to stop from using the restroom because of vigilante bull**** IS harassment.Any comment I made about you not being allowed to use the women's public restroom were made after you led me to believe that you lived in Indiana.
I understand that California has passed different laws than Indiana.
That being said - if you lived in Indiana - I would try to encourage you to live in compliance with the law, admonish you when you expressed desire to break the law or try to stop you from actively breaking the law.
More bad, wild assumptions. Just stop.You say that now - but I bet you're one of the first to say that we should ban all guns because of "bad people".
In other words if I say something you agree with that is equally dumb as your crap.I may respond to you again if you say something new and interesting.
Except it has nothing to do with bathrooms.All the more reason to have the law in place.
Alcohol is another area you stand not on solid ground as you speak.Any "health benefit" that can be gained from alcohol could be gained in even greater quantity and quality from other sources.
Ooh - vigilantism - that's new.And for the I don't know how many times it is legal for me to use the women's restroom in Indiana. You didn't use the word harassment, but trying to stop from using the restroom because of vigilante bull**** IS harassment.
More bad, wild assumptions. Just stop.
In other words if I say something you agree with that is equally dumb as your crap.
And, BTW, Frank would have a HUGE problem using the women's restroom. It's where you'd put him and he doesn't belong. Seriously, he's got a big beard, amd I think he even has his septum pierced. Or at least I think he does. He's definitely manly and masculine enough to pull it off and it just be there in my head.
Except it has nothing to do with bathrooms.
Alcohol is another area you stand not on solid ground as you speak.
Alcohol: Balancing Risks and Benefits
That is harassment.If - however - my wife happened to be in that restroom that you just entered - I'd enter right behind you.
I showed you why I have the legal permission to be there. You do not.If you have the right to enter - then so do I.
I don't believe guns should be banned, so way to add to your dumb crap and wild assumptions.You claim that I made a "wild assumption" about your position on banning guns - but that's not a denial.
I think I hit the nail on the head.
There's lots of different ways to get health benefits. Like exercise. But thats not the only method of getting certain health benefits.Where in that link does it claim that alcohol is the only method of receiving certain health benefits?