• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The assumptions behind evolution?

shawn001

Well-Known Member
God is always the same and is an energizing Spirit.

God energizes every thing seen and gives the reality lived in but personal self belief makes a barrier to Knowing God.

Mat 15:18 But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.
It is how a person talks to another that creates a problem. It comes from the mind and consciousness and this isn't easily understood. There is a subconscious bonding that cannot be let go of and it teaches responses.
The mind of man has to change for survival.

" But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart"

In his day they believed that, by now they know the heart is just a muscle and pumps blood.

"It is how a person talks to another that creates a problem."

Yeah


"It comes from the mind and consciousness and this isn't easily understood. There is a subconscious bonding that cannot be let go of and it teaches responses."

This is kind of profound in regards to modern science. Although we now know the mind is consciousness and there is no mind body separation. However, the subconscious is in control. Hence no freewill.

"The mind of man has to change for survival."

Evolution.
 

AllanV

Active Member
That's very cool, indeed. Thank's for the link.


I don't know how you get from "frozen" light to God made it appear instantly.

How do you freeze a supernova?


So you make assumptions and wild assertions, and that somehow proves something?


God is revealed in Nature. Nature and God is one. Just see your own links to scientific experiments somehow proving God. You're making the link yourself. God and Nature is one.


So again, I asked earlier, we have the DNA from neanderthals and there's been no report of decay or degradation from them to us. Or can you provide a link where this has been tested and proven? It's all great to have a hypothesis or even a computer software, but what about the actual evidence we have?

Think how much information is stored in this universe. But is light required?

How much neanderthal DNA do you have and where is the rest of it?

This scripture is the revelation of where the Eternal God is.

Psa 104:2 Who coverest thyself with light as with a garment: who stretchest out the heavens like a curtain:

God is an observer, deeper and a little beyond the mind that is thought from. The Knowledge of God can not be comprehended in the natural mind because it creates its own barrier.
 

AllanV

Active Member
So he believes in de-evolution.

"
Devolution, de-evolution, or backward evolution is the notion that species can change into more "primitive" forms over time. In modern biology the term is redundant:



Lost information through mutation barely discernible but showing a genetic entropy.
 

AllanV

Active Member
" But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart"

In his day they believed that, by now they know the heart is just a muscle and pumps blood.

"It is how a person talks to another that creates a problem."

Yeah


"It comes from the mind and consciousness and this isn't easily understood. There is a subconscious bonding that cannot be let go of and it teaches responses."

This is kind of profound in regards to modern science. Although we now know the mind is consciousness and there is no mind body separation. However, the subconscious is in control. Hence no freewill.

"The mind of man has to change for survival."

Evolution.
Yes but you're not taking the required steps. I can tell.
 

AllanV

Active Member
Can't see the relevance to the discussion about assumption behind evolution. :/

The assumption is there is no God, but no one actually knows or can say where God is. I have the experience but it is difficult to grasp therefore every one has a different idea.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
The assumption is there is no God, but no one actually knows or can say where God is. I have the experience but it is difficult to grasp therefore every one has a different idea.
The assumption is there is no God, but no one actually knows or can say where God is. I have the experience but it is difficult to grasp therefore every one has a different idea.
Assuming that there is no god is a pretty reasonable position. That is how we tend to deal with most ideas for which there is so little evidence.
 

Sapiens

Polymathematician
Lost information through mutation barely discernible but showing a genetic entropy. This loss has a connection to mind as well and it shows.
The hypothesis does not hold water and the data clearly falsifies it. Let's move on to something serious rather then spend our time embarrassing you.
 
Top