tas8831
Well-Known Member
Via the act of the zealot making false yet declarative statements about evolution.Science is not a religion. How does this relate to the science of evolution?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Via the act of the zealot making false yet declarative statements about evolution.Science is not a religion. How does this relate to the science of evolution?
Yes I know....There is no such thing as concentrated genes.
Dude? It's me. I am not the religious zealot.Look in the mirror. The rejection of science by a religious zealot.
Indeed. Ran into a guy on another forum who gave (probably still gives) 'evolution deprogramming lectures at his church in TX. Through some sleuthing, I actually came across part of one of these 'lectures', and it was Ken Ham-level gibberish, peppered with his "big thing" - fully front-loaded genomes. For which he had no evidence.I think @rrobs gave up some time ago. But it is one of the more stupid criticisms of evolution, certainly. Like a lot of this creationist boilerplate it only works rhetorically in front of an audience that knows nothing about science. Like fellow creationists, in fact.
Dude? It's me. I am not the religious zealot.
Ha. I once lived in Texas for a while.Indeed. Ran into a guy on another forum who gave (probably still gives) 'evolution deprogramming lectures at his church in TX. Through some sleuthing, I actually came across part of one of these 'lectures', and it was Ken Ham-level gibberish, peppered with his "big thing" - fully front-loaded genomes. For which he had no evidence.
It is their way.
Dude, I've been here for years. Maybe you've confused me with someone else?You need to clarify your views on science and the science of evolution.
It is a hypothesis that we may have all come from one common ancestor, thus the ToE simply does not rely on accepting that, and I don't know if we did or didn't because the evidence really isn't that clear-cut. Even if we did, that doesn't mean that it and we came out of nowhere, thus leaving open the concept of Divine creation. Matter of fact, most Christian theologians accept the basic ToE as long as it is understood that God is the ultimate Cause.A variation in a virus doesn't somehow prove that we evolve from a single celled organism.
It's still just a variation in one kind of virus.
Bully for you.What qualifications do you have to make this claim? I smell a religious agenda here based on an ancient world view over 2000 years old without a knowledge in the basic science of evolution.
I am a professional Geologist with over 50 years field experience, an d Masters in Geology.
Of course it does.It is a hypothesis that we may have all come from one common ancestor, thus the ToE simply does not rely on accepting that,
Most is a stretch.Matter of fact, most Christian theologians accept the basic ToE as long as it is understood that God is the ultimate Cause.
If we did not come from one common ancestor, specifically which mechanism of evolution would that affect? And how?Of course it does.
It simply does not.Of course it does.
No, it is not going by the last poll I saw that had 70% saying that the ToE itself does not contradict Divine creation.Most is a stretch.
That's what you just said it didn't mean.descent
Bully for you.
Not at all, as just because there's "descent" doesn't mean nor imply that all life must have come from only one individual. Even if it did, that doesn't mean nor imply there could not be Divine creation.That's what you just said it didn't mean.
That exactly what evolution claims....that we all descended from other creatures. Compare that to being breathed into life by God himself.Not at all, as just because there's "descent" doesn't mean nor imply that all life must have come from only one individual. Even if it did, that doesn't mean nor imply there could not be Divine creation.
Yep. If you're not, then are you a plant or a form of bacteria or virus or inanimate-- archaea, bacteria and eukaryote to be more precise? Those are the other options.Are you just another animal?
Yes, it's totally obvious that we are descendent from other creatures. For example, if we go back 1 billion years bp or more, there are only single-celled organisms-- no humans or anything like a human.That exactly what evolution claims....that we all descended from other creatures. Compare that to being breathed into life by God himself.