• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Biden Question

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Trump was talking about a sinking ship and if there was a shark near by, then talked about recent shark attacks, then back to his sinking boat story.

Which made 0 sense as I listened to it.

BTW, he blamed in on his malfunctioning teleprompter.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
IMO I think quite a few will look at it as Biden won't make another four years.
And has anybody ever been able to guarantee that a President will last their full term? For example: William Henry Harrison, Zachary Taylor, Abraham Lincoln, James A. Garfield, William McKinley, Warren G. Harding, Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy? Or Richard M. Nixon, who didn't die, or Ronald Reagan, who might well have with an assassin with better aim.

And did the nation fall apart each time? Not so far as I know.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
And has anybody ever been able to guarantee that a President will last their full term? For example: William Henry Harrison, Zachary Taylor, Abraham Lincoln, James A. Garfield, William McKinley, Warren G. Harding, Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy? Or Richard M. Nixon, who didn't die, or Ronald Reagan, who might well have with an assassin with better aim.

And did the nation fall apart each time? Not so far as I know.
That's a weak arguement. No one is guaranteed tomorrow. However denying or purposely overlooking that Biden's mental health is fading is like denying/overlooking that Trump hid payments.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member

We Never Know

No Slack
Eight years ago, on August 10, 2016, ABC ran a story under the headline


There is an ugly, yet almost casual, cruelness that one increasingly finds among too many Trump supporters. Nothing is quite so sad as the ease with which Trump recreates the MAGA base in his image.

1. I'm not a MAGA or a Trump fan

2. I'm not mocking Biden. I have said several times I feel sorry for him or anyone losing their mental health.

3. Saw that. Trump's flaying of his arms was a dead give away he was mocking the person. Pretty ****ty and classless.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Perhaps. I've been wrong before ...
Well here is one from a few days back.

I think Biden had Trump before the debate.

The thing is the dems tried to blame it on him having a cold. The rest of the world saw it and thought 'dang that was worse than last time" and know its not a one time episode because he has had several in the past.

I feel sorry for Biden or anyone who starts losing their mental fitness. With his age and his past episodes it signals there are more episodes to come IMO.
 
Last edited:

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
To me, this thread shouldn't even really be about "the Biden question," but rather "the existential question of the U.S." Because I truly think that is what is at stake. And for that reason, the one and only real issue is "how can Donald Trump be prevented from winning the election?" Because if he wins, and given both his record and the new immunities granted by the Supreme Court, he will be able in just 4 short years to make the nation "post-constitutional."

Does anybody really want to go there?

So who, in just 4 months, can a) gain the nomination, b) make him/herself known to the American people across the land, c) prepare and present a platform that can win approval of the majority of Americans, and d) win a plurality of votes and 270+ electoral votes?

Name names, and give your opinion about the their strengths, weaknesses and likely acceptability to the majority.
People are voting for Trump to get back to constitutional government. The dems are the ones governing as post constitutional. Trump is the normalcy candidate, the dems are radical authoritarians.

Good luck convincing Americans of this when the dems used the full force of the government to prosecute their main political opponent. Over half of Americans think the trump conviction was political.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
People are voting for Trump to get back to constitutional government.
Describe exactly what he is trying to accomplish and get back to "constitutional government", and how it doesn't exist today. Cite historical examples of Trump's idea existing and is better than how government functions today.
The dems are the ones governing as post constitutional.
Explain what this means, and why you se eit *** a problem.
Trump is the normalcy candidate, the dems are radical authoritarians.
List the norms that Trump wants, and when in history they were norms that are helpful today.
Good luck convincing Americans of this when the dems used the full force of the government to prosecute their main political opponent.
Two states found evidence of Trump commiting crimes, and they indicted him, one with a conviction.

The DOJ investigated a citizen who used to be president, and found evidence of crimes in both taking documents that belonged to the USA, and a vital role in the attack on Jan 6, 2021. The DOJ is an independent agency that does have the power and authority to indict people for crimes. That Trump happens to be running for re-election is a coincidence.
Over half of Americans think the trump conviction was political.
Many conservative people have been duped by right wing disinformation media about this matter. They seem to think the evidence against Trump isn't real, or that it is real, but Trump is special and above the law. He has a history of fraud and corruption, so why would anyone think new crimes are not real?
 
Last edited:

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
People are voting for Trump to get back to constitutional government. The dems are the ones governing as post constitutional. Trump is the normalcy candidate, the dems are radical authoritarians.
I get it now --- you've never actually listened to the man, and have zero idea what it is he says he is going to do. “Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” Trump wrote in a post on the social network Truth Social in September of 2022.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
Describe exactly what he is trying to accomplish and get back to "constitutional government", and how it doesn't exist today. Cite historical examples of Trump's idea existing and is better than how government functions today.
Explain what this means, and why you se eit *** a problem.
No where in the constitution does it allow for bureaucrats to make laws or spend money. The Dems use the large bureaucracy to make laws and spend money in violation of the constitution. The dems like to create rights that the constitution does not give. Trump wants to dismantle this bureaucracy. The also made election laws for the presidential election in violation of the US constitution.
List the norms that Trump wants, and when in history they were norms that are helpful today.
Normal border policy where we limit as many illegal entries as possible with the goal of zero illegal entries
Deport people that are here illegally
Ending citizenship of children born of illegal parents
Goal of energy independence
Rebuilding our oil strategic reserves
Rebuilding the military
Trade agreements that benefit the US worker and not foreign countries
Normal law enforcement, fund the police, aggressively prosecute violent criminals and career criminals
Restore peace in the middle east, support Israel against terrorists whose stated mission is the kill all the Jews
Restore parents rights about their children's activities and healthcare in our school system
Restore free speech rights in America, remove government censorship in social media
Ensure honest and lawful elections, ID requirements to vote
Restrict funding to Iran that Biden allowed after Biden took office to keep them from producing a nuclear weapon if it not already too late.
Stand up to China, Russia, N Korea and Iran
Restrict transwomen from women's sports
Restrict trans surgeries and treatments for minors
Stop transferring legal debt from people that took out a loan freely to the public
Low interest rates and low inflation
Remove Racist DEI initiatives etc.

This are just a few things that need to get back to normal, these are not radical ideas but common sense ideas that used to be the norm. Most of the country feels this way on both sides. The dem party is a radical party and does not reflect the values of most Americans. you are seeing that in the polls where minorities are turning to Trump.


Two states found evidence of Trump commiting crimes, and they indicted him, one with a conviction.

The DOJ investigated a citizen who used to be president, and found evidence of crimes in both taking documents that belonged to the USA, and a vital role in the attack on Jan 6, 2021. The DOJ is an independent agency that does have the power and authority to indict people for crimes. That Trump happens to be running for re-election is a coincidence.

Many conservative people have been duped by right wing disinformation media about this matter. They seem to think the evidence against Trump isn't real, or that it is real, but Trump is special and above the law. He has a history of fraud and corruption, so why would anyone think new crimes are not real?
I said it was political I never said it wasn't real. The Bragg case was brought by a prosecutor that said during his campaign he would get Trump. So this was a case of Bragg spending time and effort to find something he could prosecute Trump on in a Manhattan courtroom that he would get convicted of basically anything. That is not ethical, I bet he could find something on Biden if he wanted to. You know that this case would never have been brought if his name was not Trump. It is a weak legal theory that resurrected an expired law and somehow made it into a federal crime. This is obvious to most people with common sense.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
I get it now --- you've never actually listened to the man, and have zero idea what it is he says he is going to do. “Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” Trump wrote in a post on the social network Truth Social in September of 2022.
Ok, whatever. I actually listen to his speeches do you?

What did Trump say he meant by that comment? Do you even know?
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Ok, whatever. I actually listen to his speeches do you?

What did Trump say he meant by that comment? Do you even know?
I grew up in the English language, and I can read, too! The words mean what they say.

“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,”

See, first, he pounds away at the OUTRIGHT LIE that the 2020 election was stolen -- which apparently you have ;with amazing gullibility bought into without the necessity of even a shred of evidence, and which courts (many appointed by Trump) have over 5 dozen times rejected over 5 dozen times -- and then he uses that lie to justify breaking his oath of office.

Because, you see, he could not exercise one teensy-weensy presidential power until he takes the oath, in which he will, with Bible in hand, swear to uphold and defend to the Constitution.

Why, what do you think he meant? What language do you think it's in?
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
I grew up in the English language, and I can read, too! The words mean what they say.

“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,”

See, first, he pounds away at the OUTRIGHT LIE that the 2020 election was stolen -- which apparently you have ;with amazing gullibility bought into without the necessity of even a shred of evidence, and which courts (many appointed by Trump) have over 5 dozen times rejected over 5 dozen times -- and then he uses that lie to justify breaking his oath of office.

Because, you see, he could not exercise one teensy-weensy presidential power until he takes the oath, in which he will, with Bible in hand, swear to uphold and defend to the Constitution.

Why, what do you think he meant? What language do you think it's in?
Show me where I ever said the 2020 election was stolen. Then maybe after you calm down we can have a conversation.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Over half of Americans think the trump conviction was political
Then you've got an ignorant electorate and too many susceptible minds voting. It was an impartial jury that convicted Trump, not a politician. But over half of America might not be aware of that. How can you preserve a democracy with so many incompetent citizens? You can't. If you can put ideas like that into heads in such large numbers at will, where's the hope? There's no cavalry coming to save such people from themselves.
The Dems use the large bureaucracy to make laws and spend money in violation of the constitution.
The role of government is among other things to enact laws and spend money.
The Bragg case was brought by a prosecutor that said during his campaign he would get Trump.
It's what elected prosecutors do. They campaign on law-and-order issues. And he did get Trump. That was the plan with Gotti, too - to somehow, convict a known criminal. And Manson. That's what the RICO statutes are for - nailing crime bosses who don't get their hands dirty.

You seem to think that New York James, and Bragg didn't know what a crime boss Trump was.

And if Gotti had wormed his way into the White House, he'd still be a known criminal and needing investigation, indictment, prosecution, and incarceration, which he got as a private citizen instead, as will Trump if the Supreme Court and the Republican House can't stop these trials.

What did Trump say he meant by that comment? Do you even know?
Sure, and he didn't need to say it. We already know about his violent, vengeful, and criminal tendencies. He intends another crime wave.
 
Top