The Big Bang Theory is dead.

[SavedByTheLord]

So why would critical thinkers be harshly judged for not believing in the Christian concepts you think are true when not only is there a lack of evidence, but are also contrary to facts and what we understand is true about the world and universe?

Notice you can’t offer any rational reasons to believe in your religious framework.

Those that do not believe in the Creator are without excuse..

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, - Romans 1:18-22

 

[F1fan]

Those that do not believe in the Creator are without excuse..

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, - Romans 1:18-22

Still no factual answers. I’m not convinced. Where’s the evidence that demonstrates the Bible is true? Your say so is irrelevant.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Well disproving evolution and billions of years disproves the Big Bang too.

How does it do that? And I need to remind you, all that you have "proven" is your own lack of education.

Where did the universe come from?
What caused the Big Bang?

And back with the bogus questions.

You have yet to answer which brand of tennis shoe that God wears. Unjustified questions do not prove anything except for the ignorance and often honesty or dishonesty of the person asking those questions.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Those that do not believe in the Creator are without excuse..

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, - Romans 1:18-22

Nope, you are using circular reasoning again.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Nope, you are using circular reasoning again.

I already proved that the Bible is the true word of God, the Almighty Creator, and that evolution and billions of years are false.

 

[Sargonski]

Well for all theirs sins and of course unbelief in the gospel of Christ.

Sayeth the False Prophets - who know naught of the Teachings of Jesus .. nor of his Father .. who art in heaven.. Hallowed be the Name of the Most High God of the Order of MelchiZedek. The Source of Truth, Righteousness and Justice.. Ruling over the city of Peace.

Why do ye run from the Question put to you by Lord Jesus .. putting your own words in his mouth - usurping the position of the Logos.
Logos sayeth - "Not all those who cry "Jesus Jesus" gonna make it through the pearly gates Brother SBTL Not all those crying "Im Saved I'm Saved" might be another way to put it .. prophesy on his name . put words in the mouth of the Logos.. Usurping the position of the logos is down the dark path Friend.

Jesus said Only those who do the will of the Father .. gonna make it through the gate. but how can one do the will of the Father .. if one don't know what the "Will of the Father" is ? Not only not know the will of the Father - but not know the Father - nor his Hallowed Name. To which God do you pray "Our Father" ? -- do you not know his Hallowed Name ?

 

[Subduction Zone]

I already proved that the Bible is the true word of God, the Almighty Creator, and that evolution and billions of years are false.

LOL! No, you only proved that you have no understanding of what a logical argument is. And then you admitted that you were wrong when you ran away.

Running away from concepts that you need to defend is the same as admitting that you are wrong.

 

[John53]

I already proved that the Bible is the true word of God, the Almighty Creator, and that evolution and billions of years are false.

I don't believe you

 

[Subduction Zone]

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I don't believe you

Well that does not change the truth.

 

[John53]

Well that does not change the truth.

And what you're peddling ain't the truth.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

And what you're peddling ain't the truth.

And this truly could never have come to be by evolution.

Table 6-3, Inhibitors of Protein or RNA Synthesis - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I already proved that the Bible is the true word of God, the Almighty Creator, and that evolution and billions of years are false.

Please show us all again with a detailed description of what you have done to show this proof. Not all of us have seen it. I'm not interested in looking at previous work. I'd like something new.

 

[John53]

And this truly could never have come to be by evolution.

Table 6-3, Inhibitors of Protein or RNA Synthesis - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

Show me how it could not have evolved. Maybe try reading the book then give me a detailed explanation.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

And this truly could never have come to be by evolution.

Table 6-3, Inhibitors of Protein or RNA Synthesis - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

Please explain this too. Details man. And a comprehensive explanation showing that it could not evolve.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

And this truly could never have come to be by evolution.

Table 6-3, Inhibitors of Protein or RNA Synthesis - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

This is how this works. In civil discourse, you make a claim and then you provide the evidence and the explanation why your claim is the superior claim and why others should consider it as replacement knowledge for their previous understanding.

You are obligated to provide that or it might seem like you are not really interested in an answer and are merely on a campaign to preach.

So I can expect reason and full answers to my questions considering the implication is that you know so much about the material you can provide those answers.

 

[Subduction Zone]

And this truly could never have come to be by evolution.

Table 6-3, Inhibitors of Protein or RNA Synthesis - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

Sure it could have.

 

[Subduction Zone]

This is how this works. In civil discourse, you make a claim and then you provide the evidence and the explanation why your claim is the superior claim and why others should consider it as replacement knowledge for their previous understanding.

You are obligated to provide that or it might seem like you are not really interested in an answer and are merely on a campaign to preach.

So I can expect reason and full answers to my questions considering the implication is that you know so much about the material you can provide those answers.

Nuh uh! Not any more. Argument by unsupported assertions is the rule of the day.

Dan is a poopy head! Prove me wrong!!

 

[F1fan]

Well that does not change the truth.

If it’s the truth why can’t you provide facts? Where is your God? What facts demonstrate that salvation is real and not some imagined benefit of belief?

 

[Sargonski]

This is how this works. In civil discourse, you make a claim and then you provide the evidence and the explanation why your claim is the superior claim and why others should consider it as replacement knowledge for their previous understanding.

You are obligated to provide that or it might seem like you are not really interested in an answer and are merely on a campaign to preach.

So I can expect reason and full answers to my questions considering the implication is that you know so much about the material you can provide those answers.

the Patient has become unresponsive to requests for support for claim .. thinking repetition of premise - circular assumed premise fallacy - is proof of claim.

Show me how it could not have evolved. Maybe try reading the book then give me a detailed explanation.

And this truly could never have come to be by evolution.

Table 6-3, Inhibitors of Protein or RNA Synthesis - Molecular Biology of the Cell - NCBI Bookshelf

View attachment 83830
Nuh uh! Not any more. Argument by unsupported assertions is the rule of the day.

Dan is a poopy head! Prove me wrong!!

and that is how we do it on the playground generally frowned upon in the Adult room though !?