YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
What "bold empty threats" are you talking about?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Big Bang Theory is dead.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
I don't think so but then I'm sure you think you are scientifically literate and I am not. Lol. so as my brother in law says, have a good one.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
What evidence?
prove a single 1.
I have already refuted abiogenesis which refutes evolution.
I have already refuted the Big Bang.
Both refute billions of years.
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
What's the point? I've already given you evidence, so have many others here. You ignore it, change the subject, or dismiss it with a laughable level of misunderstanding.
See? You have done no such thing and people have explained to you why. Yet you still maintain this silly blind faith that you have done this.
This basically demonstrates that you don't have enough grasp of evidence and refutation to even begin.
It wouldn't even if you had refuted natural abiogenesis. This shows even more ignorance of the way different theories, and the evidence for them, relate to each other.
No you haven't and no they wouldn't.
There is simply no point in giving you real evidence with this level of total misunderstanding of the basics of logic, evidence, and science. Unless you're actually prepared learn why your statements are wrong in the way I've pointed out above, and to learn the basics, it would be a waste of time.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Been there, done that.
Proved to be an exercise in futility.
There is no point in giving evidence to people who aren't even willing to learn what evidence is.
Strange how these supposed falsifications have not shaken up the academic world in the relevant scientific fields.
So what? If it indeed ever turned out that the big bang theory was completely and utterly incorrect, then we would just take the data from all the research and try and find a better explanation. In fact, I am very sure that there are people who try to do just that, right now. That's just how science works.
And that new explanation will be flawed. It will be wrong. But it will be LESS WRONG than the old explanation. That's just how science works.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Well they are abandoning the Big Bang big time
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Who is 'they' and where is your evidence for this? None of the articles you've posted (that you obviously didn't understand) indicated that at all.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
They aren't.
You should really stop getting your intel from lying propaganda websites.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
You need to get away from the false teachers and just look for it on the Internet.
More and more data is refuting the Big Bang .
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
[citations missing]
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
I'm looking on proper academic websites. Not a word on anyone "abbandoning" big bang theory or even only hinting it is in trouble.
Yes, you claimed this before.
I'm calling bs.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Oh dear. This is the problem with not understanding anything about science and only reading the title of a (rather inaccurate and sensationalised) pop-science article. If you follow the various links to more detail, it's not nearly as radical as the headline suggests.
No Big Bang? Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning
Cosmology from quantum potential
In fact this is all based on a fairly old paper that gets rid of the BB singularity (which pretty much no cosmologists think is real anyway) and potentially explains the acceleration of the expansion of the universe (dark energy).
The main big bang theory is actually about the history of the expanding universe since the supposed 'start' and that isn't questioned at all.
ETA: And, of course, it's only a proposal (one of many). There is no supporting evidence as yet.
0/10 Must try harder.
Last edited:
No, you have not. And, no it doesn't.
No, you have not.
No, they do not.
That you seem think you have refuted these scientific descriptions based on flimsy evidence is just a sign that you understand NOTHING about these ideas.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
ratiocinator
Lightly seared on the reality grill.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
And why are so many people questioning the Big Bang?
Because the evidence refutes it.
At least the scientific community can and does evolve.
Learning is how scientific knowledge improves. Can you show an example of christianity evolving before it ends up dead?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Do yiu think they will ever answer the origin of anything in all creation.